sources through an oxidative deaminization/hydroly-
zation/oxidation process.
Table 1. Palladium-Catalyzed Oxidative Coupling of
Triethylamine (1a) with 4-Iodoansole (2a)a
The reaction of triethylamine (1a) with4-iodoansole(2a)
was carried out to determine the optimal reaction condi-
tions, and the results are summarized in Table 1.7 To our
delight, treatment of triethylamine (1a) with iodide 2a and
PdCl2(MeCN)2 (5 mol %) in DMSO at 100 °C for 16 h
afforded the desired 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)ethanone (3) in
23% yield (entry 1).8 Screening revealed that TBAB
(n-Bu4NBr) could improve the reaction: the yield was
enhanced to 33% in the presence of 1.5 equiv of TBAB
(entry 2). Prompted by the results, three other Pd catalysts,
such as PdCl2, Pd(OAc)2, and Pd(dba)2, were examined,
and they were less effective than PdCl2(MeCN)2 (entries
3À5). Interestingly, ZnO was found to facilitate the reac-
tion (entry 6). In light of these results, a mixture of
additives was tested to enhance the yield of 3 (entries
7À17). As expected, the reaction displayed high activity
in the presence of both TBAB and ZnO: the yield of 3 was
increased sharply to 70% (entry 7). Subsequently, a series
of other solvents, MeCN, DMF, and dioxane, were in-
vestigated, and they lowered the activity (entries 8À10)
The results demonstrated that the amount of both TBAB
and ZnO affected the reaction, and the reaction gave the
best results using 1.5 equiv of TBAB and 1.3 equiv of ZnO
(entries 11À14). Other additives, including ZnBr2, ZnCl2,
ZnF, MgO, and KF, were used to replace ZnO (entries
15À19); however, the efficacy of these additives were
lowered to some extent.7 In particular, the reaction could
not take place in the presence of KF.7 Another controlled
experiment showed that the reaction was also inert when
both ZnO and KF were added (entry 20). These imply that
ZnO is not used as a base to improve the reaction.7 Among
the amounts of PdCl2(MeCN)2 examined, it turned out
that the reaction gave the best results at a loading of
5 mol % of PdCl2(MeCN)2 (entries 7, 21, and 22). It is
noteworthy that the yield is reduced to 37% under argon
atmosphere (entry 23). Surprisingly, the yield was lowered
to 29% using 1 atm of O2 instead of air, and the GCÀMS
analysis results showed that many byproducts were gener-
ated (entry 24). Gratifyingly, the optimal conditions were
consistent with a 0.8 mmol scale of 1a (entry 25).
entry
[Pd] (mol %)
additive (equiv)
solvent yieldb (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
PdCl2(MeCN)2 (5)
PdCl2(MeCN)2 (5) TBAB (1.5)
PdCl2 (5)
Pd(OAc)2 (5)
Pd(dba)2 (5)
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
23
33
11
21
9
TBAB (1.5)
TBAB (1.5)
TBAB (1.5)
PdCl2(MeCN)2 (5) ZnO (1.3)
39
70
42
43
28
41
32
45
68
49
52
50
45
trace
trace
64
39
37
29
71
PdCl2(MeCN)2 (5) TBAB (1.5)/ZnO (1.3) DMSO
PdCl2(MeCN)2 (5) TBAB (1.5)/ZnO (1.3) MeCN
PdCl2(MeCN)2 (5) TBAB (1.5)/ZnO (1.3) DMF
10 PdCl2(MeCN)2 (5) TBAB (1.5)/ZnO (1.3) dioxane
11 PdCl2(MeCN)2 (5) TBAB (0.5)/ZnO (1.3) DMSO
12 PdCl2(MeCN)2 (5) TBAB (3)/ZnO (1.3)
13 PdCl2(MeCN)2 (5) TBAB (1.5)/ZnO (0.5) DMSO
14 PdCl2(MeCN)2 (5) TBAB (1.5)/ZnO (2) DMSO
15 PdCl2(MeCN)2 (5) TBAB (1.5)/ZnBr2 (1.3) DMSO
16 PdCl2(MeCN)2 (5) TBAB (1.5)/ZnCl2 (1.3) DMSO
17 PdCl2(MeCN)2 (5) TBAB (1.5)/ZnF2 (1.3) DMSO
18 PdCl2(MeCN)2 (5) TBAB (1.5)/MgO (1.3) DMSO
DMSO
19 PdCl2(MeCN)2 (5) TBAB (1.5)/KF (1.3)
DMSO
20c PdCl2(MeCN)2 (5) TBAB (1.5)/ZnO2 (1.3) DMSO
21 PdCl2(MeCN)2 (10) TBAB (1.5)/ZnO (1.3) DMSO
22 PdCl2(MeCN)2 (2) TBAB (1.5)/ZnO (1.3) DMSO
23d PdCl2(MeCN)2 (5) TBAB (1.5)/ZnO (1.3) DMSO
24e PdCl2(MeCN)2 (5) TBAB (1.5)/ZnO (1.3) DMSO
25f PdCl2(MeCN)2 (5) TBAB (1.5)/ZnO (1.3) DMSO
a Reaction conditions: 1a (0.3 mmol), 2a (0.9 mmol), [Pd], additive,
and solvent (2 mL) at 100 °C for 16 h under air atmosphere. b Isolated
yield. c In the presence of KF (1 equiv). d Under argon atmosphere.
e Under O2 (1 atm). f Substrate 1a (0.8 mmol) and 2a (2.0 mmol) for 32 h.
N-other unsymmetric tertiary amines, such as ethyl-N-
isopropylpropan-2-amine (1d), N,N-diethylbut-3-en-1-
amine (1e), and 2-(diethylamino)ethanol (1f), selectively
furnished 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)ethanone (3) in moderate
yields (entries 3À5). It was interesting to find that another
twice-coupled product 6, 1,2-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)etha-
none, was isolated from the reaction between 2-(diethyl-
amino)ethanol (1f) and iodide 2a (entry 5). However,
1-butylpyrrolidine (1g) was not a suitable substrate for
the reaction under the optimal conditions (entry 6). For
N-benzyl-N-butylbutan-1-amine (1h), only 1-(4-methoxy-
phenyl)ethanone (3) was isolated in 50% yield (entry 7).
Subsequently, the scope of aryl iodides was investigated
in the presence of PdCl2(MeCN)2, TBAB, and ZnO
(Table 3). The results disclosed that a variety of aryl halides
2bÀe and 2gÀk were suitable for the reaction (entries 1À5
and 7À11), but a bulky iodide 2f (entry 6) and aryl
bromides were inert. 4-Iodoaniline, for instance, was
reacted with triethylamine (1a) or tributylamine (1b)
smoothly to afford the corresponding products 7 and 8
in 96% and 87% yields, respectively (entries 1 and 2).
Other iodides, bearing p-Me, m-Me, NHAc, Cl, or CO2Et
groups on the aryl ring, were compatible with the optimal
conditions (entries 4, 5 and 7À10). However, substrate 1f
with an o-Me group was not suitable only providing a trace
of the desiredproduct 12 (entry 6). It is noteworthy that the
With the optimal conditions in hand, the scope of both
trialkylamines and aryl iodides was explored for the oxi-
dative coupling reaction (Tables 2 and 3). As shown in
Table 2, a number of trialkylamines 1 were first examined
by reacting with 4-iodoansole (2a) in the presence of
PdCl2(MeCN)2, TBAB, and ZnO. The results indicated
that tributylamine (1b) and triheptylamine (1c) success-
fully underwent the oxidative coupling reaction with 4-
iodoansole (2a) in good yield (entries 1 and 2). Notably,
(7) Detailed data is available in Table S1 of the Supporting
Information.
(8) Diethylamine was determined by GCÀMS analysis.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 9, 2011
2185