A.G. Al-Sehemi et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 91 (2012) 239–243
243
considering relative energy or relative free energy. DFT calculation
Acknowledgement
shows that E isomers are the most stable. We have observed that
dipole moment of E isomer is highest while azo isomer is lowest.
The trend in different isomers is E > Z > azo. The dipole moments of
all isomers of MBD2 are larger than MBD1.
The present work has been carried out under project No. 08-
NAN155-7 funded by KAUST (King Abdulaziz City for Science and
Technology) through the Long Term Comprehensive National Plan
for Science, Technology and Innovation program.
4.5. Conformation analysis
Appendix A. Supplementary data
For modeling and scanning calculation the initial guess for the
stable isomers E was first obtained from the optimization using
B3LYP/6-31G(d) and transformed into the Z-matrix format with
Babel program; the model starting geometry of E-isomers was
obtained by driving procedure in HyperChem [27]. To aid the
future design of isomerism, we set about to determining how
well quantum chemical methods calculation could predict the
tions, the potential energy surface shape has been examined at
the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level. The potential energy surfaces of dihe-
dral angle (N1–N2–C8–C9) from +180◦ to −180◦ in 5◦ or 10◦ steps
(−90◦ and 90◦). The aromatic rings are nearly perpendicular at these
values of selected torsion angle. The energy barriers may be due to
the steric interactions between the electrons of the two aromatic
rings. It is clear from Fig. 3, there are three local minima observed at
(−180, 0 and 180) for N1–N1–N2–C8–C9 torsional angle and these
are most stable conformers for this torsion angle. The DFT opti-
mized geometry of these dyes is coplanar at these values of selected
torsion angle.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References
[1] S. Kim, H. Choi, Ch. Baik, K. Song, S.O. Kanga, J. Koa, Tetrahedron 63 (2007)
11436–11443.
[2] L. Xiao, Y. Liu, Q. Xiu, L. Zhang, L. Guo, H. Zhang, Ch. Zhong, Tetrahedron 66
(2010) 2835–2842.
[3] M. Gratzel, Nature 414 (2001) 338.
[4] A. Hagfeldt, M. Gratzel, Acc. Chem. Res. 33 (2000) 269.
[5] M.K. Nazeeruddin, A. Kay, I. Rodicio, R. Humphry-Baker, E. Muller, P. Liska, N.
Vlachopoulos, M. Gratzel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115 (1993) 6382.
[6] Sh.-Sh. P. Chou, Yu-Yeh, Tetrahedron Lett. 42 (2001) 1309–1311.
[7] P.N. Prasad, Y. Zhang, X. Gao, H. Pan, Chem. Mater. 7 (1995) 816–821.
[8] P.N. Prasad, D.J. Williams, Introduction to Nonlinear Optical Effects in Molecules
and Polymers, Wiley, New York, 1991, pp. 132–174.
[9] K.J. Drost, A.K-Y. Jen, V.P. Rao, Chemtech 25 (9) (1995) 16–25.
[10] S.R. Marder, J.W. Perry, Science 263 (1994) 1706–1707.
[11] C.W. Dirk, H.E. Katz, M.L. Schilling, L.A. King, Chem. Mater. 2 (6) (1990) 700.
[12] A.K.Y. Jen, V.P. Rao, K.Y. Wong, K.J. Drost, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1 (1993)
90–92.
[13] A.M. Asiri, J. Saudi, Chem. Soc. 7 (2003) 77.
[14] A.M. Asiri, I.M.I. Ismail, K.A. Al-Amry, N.A. Fatani, Dyes Pigments 67 (2005)
111.
[15] A.M. Asiri, I.M.I. Ismail, K.A. Al-Amry, N.A. Fatani, 71 (2006) 102–107.
[16] A.D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98 (1993) 5648.
[17] C. Lee, W. Yang, R.G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 37 (1988) 785.
[18] P.J. Stephens, F.J. Devlin, C.F. Chabalowski, M.J. Frisch, Phys. Chem. 98 (1994)
11623.
[19] B.J. Lynch, P.L. Fast, M. Harris, D.G. Truhlar, J. Phys. Chem. A 104 (2000) 4811.
[20] J.P. Perdew, J.A. Chevary, S.H. Vosko, K.A. Jackson, M.R. Pederson, D.J. Singh, C.
Fiolhais, Phys. Rev. B 46 (1992) 6671.
[21] P.J. Walsh, K.C. Gordon, D.L. Officer, W.M. Campbell, J. Mol. Struct. Thechem.
759 (2006) 17–24.
[22] D.M. Cleland, K.C. Gordon, D.L. Officer, P. Wagner, P.J. Walsh, Spectrochim. Acta
A 74 (2009) 931–935.
[23] M.J. Frisch, et al., Gaussian 03, revision C.02, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, Walling-
ford, CT, 2004.
[24] M.P. Balanay, D.H. Kim, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10 (2008) 5121–5127.
[25] F.D. Angelis, S. Fntacci, A. Selloni, Nanotechnology 19 (2008) 424002.
[26] S. Ito, S.M. Zakeeruddin, R. Humphry-Baker, P. Liska, R. Charvet, P. Comte, M.K.
Nazeeruddin, P. Péchy, M. Takata, H. Miura, S. Uchida, Grätzel, Adv. Mater. 18
(2006) 1202–1205.
5. Conclusions
The DFT calculation of thermodynamic parameters revealed
that the most stable isomers are E. Three local minima have been
viewed at (−180, 0 and 180) for N1–N2–C8–C9 torsional angle
which revealed that these would be the most stable conformers for
this torsion angle. The HOMO is localized on intact molecule while
LUMO is distributed on the tricarbonitrile which showed best intra
charge transfer. The dyes were measured in various solvents having
different polarity. Generally increasing the solvent polarity gave a
bathochromic shift of the maximum absorption bands of dyes. The
IR spectra of the investigated dyes showed three significant absorp-
tion bands. The LUMO energies of MBD1 and MBD2 are above the
conduction band of TiO2. The HOMOs of the dyes are below the
redox couple and smaller HOMO–LUMO energy gaps revealed that
these dyes would be efficient for DSSC.
[27] L.M.A. Pinto, M.B. de Jesus, E. de Paula, A.C.S. Lino, J.B. Alderete, H.A. Duarte, Y.
Takahata, J. Mol. Struct. Theochem. 678 (2004) 63–66.