2202
G. A. Molander, F. Cadoret / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 2199–2202
obtained, corresponding to the stereochemical relationship re-
ported for halicyclamine A.
4. Conclusion
In summary, an advanced intermediate for the synthesis of the
core of halicyclamine A was prepared with the correct stereochem-
istry, in 17-steps and a global yield of 1.27%. The original approach
for this synthesis featured a diastereoselective intramolecular
Diels–Alder reaction. Initial attempts at ring closure to form the
second piperidinyl ring have failed but studies are still in progress
Figure 4. 3D Structure of the amine 10 deduced from NMR analyses.
for the completion of the synthesis by activating the a-hydroxy ke-
tone or protecting the ketone to avoid side-reactions.
low temperature gave the expected keto-alcohol 14. Owing to the
relative instability of the intermediate keto-aldehyde, the se-
quence was conducted without any purification, which resulted
in a significantly improved yield. The resulting alcohol was pro-
tected with TBDPS chloride to access the ketone 15. Selective
deprotection of the TBS ether yielded the corresponding alcohol
16. Hydrogenolysis of the Cbz group of the amine required the
use of palladium(II) hydroxide to give the secondary amine of com-
pound 17. A Mitsunobu cyclization12 was attempted to access the
core of Halicyclamine A 18 but initial attempts at this transforma-
tion have not been successful. The formation of an unidentified
product was observed, perhaps due to side-reactions involving
the carbonyl functional group or the low reactivity of the primary
alcohol and benzylamine system.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant from the French Ministère
des Affaires étrangères (BFE—Lavoisier) and the NIH (R01 GM-
081376). We thank Dr. Rakesh Kohli (University of Pennsylvania)
for the HRMS data. We are also grateful to Johnson-Matthey for
their donation of palladium(II) acetate.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (experimental procedures and spectral
characterization for all compounds) associated with this article
3. Studies on the stereochemistry of the amine 10
References and notes
The stereochemistry of the three contiguous stereocenters
simultaneously formed by the Diels–Alder reaction was investi-
gated. The study was conducted on the amine 10 instead of the
aldehyde 9 because the NMR spectrum of the amine was more
suitable for this purpose. The chemical shifts of each of the protons
of the molecule were assigned by 2D NMR experiments (COSY,
HMQC; see also Supplementary data).
The relative stereochemistry between protons 4a and 5 in the
Diels–Alder adduct 9 or the amine 10 was assigned as trans owing
to their stereochemical relationship in the enal 7. Consequently, it
remained to assign the hydrogens at the ring junction (4a and 8a)
as being either in a cis or in a trans relationship (Fig. 2).
The NOESY NMR experiment clearly showed an NOE effect be-
tween the two signals at 1.59–1.77 and 1.80–1.96 ppm (Fig. 3),
which correspond to protons 6/8a and 40/5, respectively.
With the help of the NOESY spectrum and Chem3D model
(Fig. 4, see also Supplementary data for the discussion), we deter-
mined that this effect can be attributed to protons 5 and 8a, which
demonstrated that trans-10 is the stereoisomer which was
1. Jaspars, M.; Pasupathy, V.; Crews, P. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 3253–3255.
2. Matsunaga, S.; Miyata, Y.; van Soest, R. W. M.; Fusetani, N. J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 67,
1758–1760.
3. Arai, M.; Sobou, M.; Vilchéze, C.; Baughn, A.; Hashizume, H.; Pruksakorn, P.;
Ishida, S.; Matsumoto, M.; Jacobs, W. R., Jr.; Kobayashi, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2008, 16, 6732–6736.
4. (a) Jakubowicz, K.; Abdeljelil, K. B.; Herdemann, M.; Martin, M.-T.; Gateau-
Olesker, A.; Al Mourabit, A.; Marazano, C.; Das, B. C. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64,
7381–7387; (b) Sanchez-Salvatori, M. d. R.; Marazano, C. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68,
8883–8889.
5. Sinigaglia, I.; Nguyen, T. M.; Wypych, J.-C.; Delpech, B.; Marazano, C. Chem. Eur.
J. 2010, 16, 3594–3597.
6. Smith, B. J.; Sulikowski, G. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 1599–1602.
7. Cayzer, T. N.; Paddon-Row, M. N.; Sherburn, M. S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 4059–
4068.
8. Kalinin, A. V.; Scherer, S.; Snieckus, V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3399–
3404.
9. Molander, G. A.; Felix, L. A. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 3950–3956.
10. Trippett, S.; Walker, D. M. J. Chem. Soc. 1961, 1266–1272.
11. Higashibayashi, S.; Shinko, K.; Ishizu, T.; Hashimoto, K.; Shirahama, H.; Nakata,
M. Synlett 2000, 1306–1308.
12. Kim, S.; Lee, T.; Lee, E.; Lee, J.; Fan, G.-J.; Lee, S. K.; Kim, D. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69,
3144–3149.