The closely related 2,3-disubstituted benzo[b]furans
have attracted extensive synthetic interest and also exhibit
a broad range of biological activities.11 Among synthetic
strategies for benzo[b]furans, Pd-catalyzed cyclizations are
particularly attractive, allowing for the simultaneous in-
stallation of a carbonyl substituent at C3, to give the 2,3-
disubstituted systems.12 Our approach would provide access
to both 2-arylbenzo[b]furan and 2-aryl-2,3-dihydrobenzo-
[b]furan-containing natural products and analogues. Key
toits success was developing a method toreduce the benzo-
[b]furan system to the corresponding trans-2,3-dihydro-
benzo[b]furan. The retrosynthetic strategy (Scheme 1)
highlights the concise and highly modular approach we
proposed to access these compounds.
10ꢀ1414 and aryl iodide 915 with arylalkynes 14ꢀ16
(Table 1). Traditional coupling conditions were well-suited
for generating diarylalkynes 17aꢀe (Method A); however
yields of 18b and 18c were improved by using the condi-
tions of Andrus et al.16 (Method B). Deacetylation of
17aꢀe was hampered by a competing side reaction that
produced unwanted protio-cyclized benzofurans, which
lacked the carbomethoxy functionality at the 3-position.
Cs2CO3 in MeOHꢀTHF at 0 °C, afforded ortho-hydro-
xydiarylalkynes 19aꢀe in good yield with no appreciable
protio-cyclization.
Table 1. Synthesis of ortho-Hydroxydiarylalkynes
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis of 2-Aryl-2,3-dihydobenzo-
[b]furan-3-carboxylates (3)
product
product
entry ArI alkyne
R1
(yield, %) (yield, %)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
9
9
9
10
11
12
13
14
14
15
16
Ph
17aa (98)
17ba (68)
19a (99)
19b (98)
19c (87)
19d (95)
19e (85)
20a (89)
20bc (94)
20c (89)
2-Np
We envisaged that dihydrobenzofuran 3 would be
formedby stereoselective reduction of benzofuran4, which
would be derived from ortho-hydroxydiarylalkyne 5, using
a carbonylative annulation reaction. Compound 5 would
be derivedfrom the Sonogashira coupling of protectedaryl
iodide 6 and arylalkyne 7. Initial investigations focused on
developing this route, using aryl iodides (8, 9) and terminal
alkynes (10ꢀ16). Subsequently, the utility of this method
was demonstrated by the formal total synthesis of the anti-
HIV natural product (þ)-lithospermic acid (1).
3,4,5-(MeO)3C6H2 17ca (84)
3,5-(MeO)2C6H3
4-(MeO)C6H4
4-(MeO)C6H4
3,4-(OCH2O)C6H3 18bb (97)
TIPS
18cb (77)
17da (77)
17ea (73)
18aa (100)
a Method A. b Method B. c The intermediate acetal was purified and
then deacetylated using Cs2CO3 in MeOHꢀTHF.
It was necessary, in the case of benzaldehydes 18aꢀc
(Table 1), to protect the aldehyde functionality in prepara-
tion for the carbonylative annulation and subsequent
reduction step. Thus, 18aꢀc were subjected to a one-
pot procedure that included protection of the aldehyde
as a cyclic acetal, followed by in situ methanolysis of the
acetate, to reveal the ortho-hydroxydiarylalkynes 20aꢀc.
The carbonylative annulation conditions of Kondo12a
and Scammells12b were well-suited to our systems (Table 2).
Applying these conditions to ortho-hydroxydiarylalkynes
19aꢀe and 20aꢀc, moderate to excellent benzofuran pro-
duct yields were achieved for all but 20c (entry 8, Table 2).
Reaction rates were enhanced by heating to 40 °C; yet, this
had a detrimental effect on 22aꢀb yields, so these reactions
were conducted at rt. Interestingly, a methyl acetal bypro-
duct, resulting from trans-acetalization, was observed in the
cases of 1,3-dioxane substrates 20aꢀc.17
The diarylalkyne substrates were synthesized by Sono-
gashira coupling of aryl iodide 813 with arylalkynes
ꢁ
~ ꢁ ꢁ
(9) Garcıa-Munoz, S.; Alvarez-Corral, M.; Jimenez-Gonzalez, L.;
´
ꢁ
ꢁ
~
Lopez-Sanchez, C.; Rosales, A.; Munoz-Dorado, M.; Rodrı
guez-Garcıa,
´ ´
I. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 12182–90.
(10) Natori, Y.; Tsutsui, H.; Sato, N.; Nakamura, S.; Nambu, H.;
Shiro, M.; Hashimoto, S. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 4418–4421.
(11) For recent synthetic strategies, see: (a) Kao, C.-L.; Chern, J.-W.
J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 6772–6787. (b) Cho, C.-H.; Neuenswander, B.;
Lushington, G. H.; Larock, R. C. J. Comb. Chem. 2008, 10, 941–47.
(c) Duan, S.-F.; Shen, G.; Zhang, Z.-B. Synthesis 2010, 15, 2547–52.
(d) Bang, H. B.; Han, S. Y.; Choi, D. H.; Yang, D. M.; Hwang, J. W.; Lee,
H. S.; Jun, J.-G. Synth. Commun. 2009, 39, 506–515. (e) Scammells, P. J.;
Baker, S. P.; Beauglehole, A. R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1998, 6, 1517–1524.
(12) For examples, see: (a) Kondo, Y.; Sakamoto, T.; Yamanaka, H.
Heterocycles 1989, 29, 1013–1016. (b) Lutjens, H.; Scammells, P. J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 6581–6584. (c) Nan, Y.; Miao, H.; Yang, Z.
Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 297–299.
(13) Miao, H.; Yang, Z Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1765–68.
(14) Alkynes 10, 13, and 16 were commercially available. All other
alkynes were prepared from the corresponding aldehyde by the Coreyꢀ
Fuchs alkynylation procedure: Corey, E. J.; Fuchs, P. L. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1972, 36, 3769–3772.
(16) Andrus, M. B.; Lepore, S. D.; Turner, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1997, 119, 12159–12169.
(17) The methyl acetal counterparts could be separated by column
chromatography or carried on as a mixture with the 1,3-dioxane to the
subsequent step.
(15) See Supporting Information for the acetate protection of
2-iodoisovanillin, which was prepared according to: Markovich,
K. M.; Tantishaiyakul, V.; Hamada, A.; Miller, D. D.; Romstedt,
K. J.; Shams, G.; Shin, Y.; Fraundorfer, P. F.; Doyle, K.; Feller,
D. R. J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 466–479.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 13, 2011
3377