Table 1. The results of the screening: Pd-catalyzed trifluoromethylation
the Ruppert–Prakash reagent TMSCF3 is used as CF3
of indole 1a.[a]
source. In this reaction, the formation of the (Ar)PdIV CF3
À
intermediate possibly occurs through oxidation by using
+
PhIACHTUNGTRENNUNG
(OAc)2 (Scheme 1C),[8] rather than the previous CF3
pathway (Scheme 1B).
Indoles containing a CF3 group on the pyrrole ring are a
key moiety in biological and medicinal chemistry,[9] and
therefore the synthesis of these compounds is of great inter-
est.[10] Among the investigated methods, the directed tri-
fluoromethylation of indoles represents the most efficient
synthetic strategy. In our previous studies on the fluorina-
Entry
Ligand
Base
Oxidant
PhI(OAc)2
PhI(OAc)2
PhI(OAc)2
PhI(OAc)2
PhI(OAc)2
PhI(OAc)2
PhI(OAc)2
PhI(OAc)2
PhI(OAc)2
PhI(OPiv)2
PhI(TFA)2
3
4
5
6
7
Yield [%][b]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
AgF
CsF
KF
G
36
45
33
0
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
NaF
ZnF2
CsOAc
KOAc
K2CO3
CsF
CsF
CsF
CsF
–
–
–
–
CsF
CsF
CsF
CsF
CsF
CsF
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
À
tion of unactivated alkenes, the formation of C F bond un-
R
0
À
derwent an oxidative cleavage of the C Pd bond by using
N
21
33
30
0
42
0
34
0
0
(OAc)2/AgF at room temperature.[11] The postulation
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
PhI
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
that AgCF3 species possesses similar reactivity with AgF
9[c]
10
11
12
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
À
prompted us to make an attempt to build a C CF3 bond at
G
mild reaction conditions. To test this hypothesis, electron-
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
rich indoles were chosen to corroborate the feasibility be-
13[d]
14[d]
15
[12]
À
cause of the easy formation of the Ar Pd bond.
Our initial studies focused on the trifluoromethylation of
N-methyl-3-methylindole 1a with AgCF3, which was gener-
ated in situ from the reaction of TMSCF3 and AgF (Table 1,
entry 1).[13] We were pleased to discover that the desired 2-
trifluoromethylated product 2a (36% yield) was obtained in
0
0
16
17[e]
18[e]
19[e]
20[e]
21[e,f]
22[e,g]
Bpy
BC
L1
L2
L2
L2
PhI
PhI(OAc)2
PhI(OAc)2
PhI(OAc)2
PhI(OAc)2
PhI(OAc)2
A
41
50
58
64
68
82
AHCTUNGTRENNUNG
AHCTUNGTRENNUNG
AHCTUNGTRENNUNG
the presence of PdACHTUNGTRENNUNG(OAc)2 at room temperature. When CsF
AHCTUNGTRENNUNG
À
and KF were used as FÀ sources to generate CF3 , the reac-
tions also gave 2a in moderate yield, and CsF gave the best
yield (Table 1, entries 2 and 3). But other fluoride salts, such
as NaF and ZnF2, failed to give product 2a (Table 1, en-
tries 4 and 5). Some nonfluoride bases have also been used
AHCTUNGTRENNUNG
À
to generate CF3 for this trifluoromethylation, albeit in
slightly lower yields (Table 1, entries 6–8). No reaction oc-
curred in the absence of the Pd catalyst (Table 1, entry 9).
Interestingly, a screening of potential oxidants revealed that
[a] Reaction conditions: 1a (0.1 mmol), PdACTHNUTRGENUG(N OAc)2 (10 mol%), oxidant
only hypervalent iodine reagents such as PhI
PhI(OPiv)2 were effective (Table 1, entries 1 and 10). The
cyclic iodine(III) oxidant 3 gave a slightly lower yield
(34%). But PhI(TFA)2 could not afford the desired product
ACHTUNGRTEN(NUNG OAc)2 and
(0.2 mmol), TMSCF3 (0.4 mmol), and base (0.4 mmol) in CH3CN
(1.0 mL) at room temperature. [b] Yield determined by 19F NMR analysis
with trifluoromethylbenezene as internal standard. [c] Without Pd cata-
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
lyst. [d] Another CF3 reagent (4 equiv) was used instead of CF3À. [e] A
+
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
ligand (15 mol%) was used. [f] 2,6-Di-tert-butylphenol (0.5 equiv) was
added. [g] TEMPO (0.5 equiv) was added.
owing to its strong oxidizing property (Table 1, entries 11
and 12). Furthermore, the controlling experiments demon-
+
strated that the electrophilic CF3 reagents 4[14] and 5[15]
were inappropriate for the transformation (Table 1, en-
tries 13 and 14). The reactions using the F+ reagent as an
oxidant also failed to generate the desired product (Table 1,
entries 15 and 16). Considering the potential effectiveness of
peridinyloxyl (TEMPO) and 2,6-di-tert-butylphenol were
conducted. Indeed, the side reaction was inhibited (Table 1,
entries 21 and 22). To our delight, the addition of TEMPO
(50 mol%) significantly improved the yields of product 2a
(82% yield). This observation is also a solid proof against
the possible radical pathway.
With the optimized reaction condition, the scope of this
trifluoromethylation was investigated with a variety of in-
doles, and the results are summarized in Table 2. First, dif-
ferent substituents on nitrogen were screened. Similar to N-
methyl-3-methylindole, the reactions of N-alkyl-3-methylin-
doles gave the corresponding products 2b–2d in moderate
to good yields, whereas N-phenyl-3-methylindole and N-
SEM-3-methylindole gave products 2e and 2 f in slightly
lower yields. However, only trace amount of 2g was ob-
ligands,
a series of nitrogen-containing ligands were
screened and ligand L2 proved to be the best (Table 1, en-
tries 17–20). However, in depth optimization of reaction
conditions, including the use of longer reaction time, in-
creased reaction concentration, and/or elevated tempera-
tures, did not improve the yields, whereas the starting mate-
rial 1a was completely consumed under these conditions.
Meanwhile, a small amount of side-product containing CF3
group on the benzene ring was isolated. These observations
implied the possible involvement of radical process in the
reaction which might account for the side reaction. Thus, at-
tempts to add radical traps, such as 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-pi-
6040
ꢁ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 6039 – 6042