hydrolysis of an aryl vinyl ether promoted by mercury
species,6 so-called the oxymercuration reaction, can pro-
vide two notable features that overcome the existing
challenges: the reaction is specific toward mercury(II) ions;
more importantly, the reaction also proceeds by methyl-
mercury species. The reactive probe also emits “turn-on”
fluorescence toward the mercury species.
evaluated vinyl ethers 1ꢀ6 with respect to their reactivity
toward HgCl2, their solubility in aqueous media, and their
photophysical properties. The results can be summarized
as follows: The hydrolysis reaction becomes faster when
electron-donating groups are substituted at the phenol
ring, in particular at the para position with respect to the
hydroxyl group; otherwise, the hydrolysis becomes slower,
and thus the corresponding vinyl ethers are not suitable for
the purpose of sensing. For example, vinyl ethers 1ꢀ3
reacted faster with HgCl2 than the meta derivatives 4 and 5
as well as the nonsubstituted analogue 6. Also, among the
para analogues, vinyl ether 1 undergoes the hydrolysis
reaction faster than 2 and 3; the hydrolysis is complete
within 30 min in the case of 1 (10 μM, 2 equiv with respect
to[HgCl2]); however, ittakes more than1 h inthe cases of 2
and 3 (Figures S1ꢀS5). In addition, the vinyl ethers
substituted with the ꢀNHCOPh or ꢀNHCOCF3 group,
for example, 2 and 3, required 20ꢀ30% of CH3CN (by
volume) to dissolve them in water, whereas only ∼1% of
CH3CN is sufficient to dissolve 1 in a phosphate buffer
solution.
Our continuing efforts to develop versatile molecular
probes with useful features for bioimaging, environmental
monitoring, or ready quantification of mercury species led
us to investigate a ratiometric version of the vinyl ether
probe. Such a ratiometric fluorescent probe would offer an
advantage over the intensity-based probes such as less
sensitivity to the errors associated with the probe concen-
tration, photobleaching, instrument’s sensitivity, and en-
vironmental effects.7 Various strategies have been adopted
forthe design of ratiometric fluorescent probes.8 A handful
of ratiometric fluorescent probes for mercury species,
however, have been reported so far.9 As our approach
of the vinyl ether hydrolysis by mercury ions has proven
to be effective,5a a ratiometric fluorescent probe based
on the hydrolysis reaction would provide us with a
valuable tool for the detection of the toxic species, with
an added improvement over the potential errors. Re-
ported here are preliminary results from our efforts
in this endeavor.
2-(Benzothiazol-2-yl)phenol and its derivatives, upon
irradiation, generate the excited-state intramolecular pro-
ton transfer (ESIPT) tautomers (the keto forms), which
fluoresce more strongly and at longer wavelength com-
pared to the phenol forms. Recently O-functionalized
2-(benzothiazol-2-yl)phenols were developed as the ratio-
metric fluorescent probes for anions such as Fꢀ and
phosphatases.8dꢀg In these examples, the O-functionalized
compounds are converted to the starting phenols by
analyte-promoted/-catalyzed reactions, with the conver-
sions offering ratiometric responses because 2-(benzo-
thiazol-2-yl)phenols and their O-functionalized derivatives
fluoresce at different wavelengths.
Figure 1. Vinyl ethers 1ꢀ6 and their devinylated products evalu-
ated. The maximum emission wavelengths were obtained by
excitation at the corresponding maximum absorbance wavelengths.
We designed vinyl ethers 1ꢀ6 as potential ratio-
metric probes for mercury species (Figure 1). These vinyl
ethers are expected to undergo the mercury-promoted
oxymercuration followed by hydrolysis to generate
the corresponding 2-(benzothiazol-2-yl)phenols. We have
The emission data for the vinyl ethers and the correspond-
ing phenols also show that the emission wavelengths are
affected by the substituents. From these results, vinyl ether 1
was chosen as an optimal probe for mercury species as it
shows the desired reactivity, solubility, and photophysical
properties compared with the others. The synthesis and
(7) (a) Grynkiewicz, G.; Poenie, M.; Tsien, R. Y. J. Biol. Chem. 1985,
260, 3440. (b) Banthia, S.; Samanta, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 6437.
(8) (a) Que, E. L.; Domaille, D. W.; Chang, C. J. Chem. Rev. 2008,
108, 1517. (b) Kim, H. J.; Park, S. Y.; Yoon, S.; Kim, J. S. Tetrahedron
2008, 64, 1294. (c) Jung, H. J.; Singh, N.; Jang, D. O. Tetrahedron Lett.
2008, 49, 2960. (d) Yang, X.-F.; Qi, H.; Wang, L.; Su, Z.; Wang, G.
Talanta 2009, 80, 92. (e) Kim, I. T.; Kang, J. H.; Han, G.; Chung, J. S.;
Kim, Y. Chem. Commun. 2009, 5895. (f) Hu, R.; Feng, J.; Hu, D.; Wang,
S.; Li, S.; Li, Y.; Yang, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 4915. (g)
Chen, H. W.; Xing, Y.; Pang, Y. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1362.
Scheme 1. Hydrolysis of Probe 1 by Mercury Species
(9) (a) Zhang, X.; Xiao, Y.; Qian, X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47,
8025. (b) Yuan, M.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Li, C.; Liu, X.; Lv, J.; Xu, J.; Liu, H.;
Wang, S.; Zhu, D. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2313. (c) Wegner, S. V.; Okesli, A.;
Chen, P.; He, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3474. (d) Shang, G. Q.;
Gao, X.; Chen, M. X.; Zheng, H.; Xu, J. G. J. Fluoresc. 2008, 18, 1187.
(e) Liu, B.; Tian, H. Chem. Commun. 2005, 3156. (f) Choi, M. G.; Kim,
Y. H.; Namgoong, J. E.; Chang, S. K. Chem. Commun. 2009, 3560. (h)
Li, H.; Yan, H. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2009, 113, 7526. (i) Leng, B.; Zou, L.;
Jiang, J.; Tian, H. Sens. Actuators B 2009, 140, 162.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 13, 2011
3423