4112
T. Yamada et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 19 (2011) 4106–4113
and the products were purified by HPLC using MeCN/H2O (50:50)
761.1952); 1H NMR
d ppm (CDCl3): 1.10 (3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz,
as the eluent to afford 5 (2.1 mg).8
11-CH3), 1.26 (3H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, H-13), 1.35 (3H, s, 7-CH3), 2.61
(1H, dqd, J = 7.5, 6.5, 6.0 Hz, H-11), 3.02 (1H, ddd, J = 13.1, 11.5,
5.0 Hz, H-8a), 3.51 (3H, s, MTPA–OCH3), 3.59 (3H, s, MTPA–
OCH3), 3.86 (1H, dd, J = 13.1, 11.0 Hz, H-10a), 4.28 (1H, dd,
J = 11.0, 5.0 Hz, H-10b), 5.11 (1H, quint, J = 6.0 Hz, H-12), 5.37
(1H, d, J = 11.5 Hz, H-8), 5.95 (1H, d, J = 15.5 Hz, H-9), 6.00 (1H,
s, H-4), 6.48 (1H, dd, J = 15.5, 7.5 Hz, H-10), 7.37–7.42 (3H, m,
Ar–H), 7.42–7.47 (3H, m, Ar–H), 7.49–7.52 (2H, m, Ar–H),
7.67–7.70 (2H, m, Ar–H).
4.4. Formation of the acetonide 6 from 2
2,2-Dimethoxypropane (1 mL) and p-toluenesulfonate (3.6 mg)
were added to a CH2Cl2 solution (1 mL) of chaetomugilin Q (2)
(17.9 mg), and the reaction mixture was left at room temperature
for 2 h. The solvent was evaporated off under reduced pressure,
and the residue was purified by HPLC using MeCN/H2O (70:30)
as the eluent to afford the acetonide 6 (6.5 mg) as a yellow powder.
Acetonide 6: ½a 2D2
ꢂ
ꢀ105.0 (c 0.16, EtOH); FABMS m/z (rel. int.)
4.7. Cytotoxic assay
465 ([M+H]+, 100%); HRFABMS m/z found 465.2050 [M+H]+ (calcd
for C25H3435ClO6, 465.2054). 1H and 13C NMR data are listed in
Table 2 and S2 (Supplementary data).
Cytotoxic activities of chaetomugilins P–R (1–3) and 11-epi-
chaetomugilin I (4) were examined by the 3-(4, 5-dimethyl-2-
thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) method.
P388, HL-60, L1210 and KB cells were cultured in the Eagle’s
Minimum Essential Medium (10% fetal carf serum) at 37 °C in
5% CO2. The test material was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide
(DMSO) to give a concentration of 10 mm, and the solution
was diluted with the Essential Medium to give concentrations
4.5. Degradation by potassium hydroxide of 3
Chaetomugilin R (3) (18.6 mg) was dissolved in 10 mL of 5% aq
potassium hydroxide and stirred for 3 h at 100 °C. The reaction
mixture was extracted with 10 mL of CHCl3. The water layer was
adjusted to pH 3.0 with 9% sulfuric acid and reextracted with
10 mL of AcOEt. The organic extract was concentrated to dryness
in vacuo. The residue was purified by HPLC using a MeCN/H2O gra-
dient (0:100)–(60:40) as the eluent to afford (4S, 5S)-2E-5-hydro-
xy-4-methylhex-2-enoic acid (0.6 mg) as a colorless oil. Using the
same procedure, chaetomugilin I (5) (16.8 mg), whose absolute
stereostructure had been established, was treated with 5% aq
potassium hydroxide (10 mL), and purified by HPLC to afford (4R,
5R)-2E-5-hydroxy-4-methylhex-2-enoic acid (0.5 mg) as a color-
less oil.
of 200, 20 and 2 lM, respectively. Each solution was combined
with each cell suspension (1 ꢁ 105 cells/ml) in the medium,
respectively. After incubation at 37 °C for 72 h in 5% CO2, the
grown cells were labeled with 5 mg/ml MTT in phosphate-buf-
fered saline (PBS), and the absorbance of formazan dissolved
with 20% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in 0.1 N HCl was mea-
sured at 540 nm using microplate reader (Model 450, BIO-
RAD). Each value was expressed as a percentage, relative to a
control cell suspension prepared without the test substance. All
assays were performed three times, semilogarithmic plots were
constructed from the averaged data, and the effective dose of
the substance required to inhibit cell growth by 50% (IC50) was
determined.
(4R, 5R)-2E-5-hydroxy-4-methylhex-2-enoic acid: ½a D22
ꢂ
90.0 (c
0.05, EtOH); HRFABMS m/z: 145.0867 found [M+H]+ (calcd for
C7H13O3,145.0865); 1H NMR
d ppm (CDCl3): 1.12 (3H, d,
J = 6.5 Hz, 4-CH3), 1.19 (3H, d, J = 6.2 Hz, H-6), 2.44 (1H, dqd,
J = 7.5, 6.5, 6.2 Hz, H-4), 3.80 (1H, quint, J = 6.2 Hz, H-5), 5.90 (1H,
d, J = 15.5 Hz, H-2), 7.06 (1H, dd, J = 15.5, 7.5 Hz, H-3).
Acknowledgments
(4S, 5S)-2E-5-hydroxy-4-methylhex-2-enoic acid: ½a D22
ꢂ
–89.8 (c
We thank Dr. T. Ito (National Institute of Technology and
Evaluation, Biological Resource Center) and Dr. Endo (Kanazawa
University) for identification of the fungal strain, and for supply
of the cancer cells, respectively. We are grateful to Ms. M. Fujitake
and Dr. K. Minoura of this university for MS and NMR measure-
ments, respectively. This study was supported by a Grant-in-aid
for High Technology from the Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
0.06, EtOH); HRFABMS m/z: 145.0868 found [M+H]+ (calcd for
C7H13O3, 145.0865).
4.6. Formation of the (R)- and (S)-MTPA esters 3a and 3b from 3
(R)-MTPA (4.0 mg), dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) (4.0 mg)
and 4-(dimethylamino) pyridine (DMAP) (1.0 mg) were added to
a CH2Cl2 solution (0.5 mL) of chaetomugilin R (3) (2.0 mg), and
the reaction mixture was left at room temperature for 3 h. The sol-
vent was evaporated off under reduced pressure, and the residue
was purified by HPLC using MeCN/H2O (85:15) as the eluent to af-
ford (R)-MTPA ester 3a (1.8 mg) as a yellow powder. The same
reaction with 3 (2.3 mg) using (S)-MTPA (4.8 mg) gave the ester
3b (1.7 mg).
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
Compuond 3a: FABMS m/z (rel. int.) 761 ([M+H]+, 23.3%).
HRFABMS m/z found 761.1943 [M+H]+ (calcd for C36H3635ClF6O9,
761.1952); 1H NMR d ppm (CDCl3): 1.03 (3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz, 11-
CH3), 1.31 (3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz, H-13), 1.33 (3H, s, 7-CH3), 2.57
(1H, dqd, J = 8.0, 6.8, 6.5 Hz, H-11), 3.10 (1H, ddd, J = 13.1, 12.0,
5.0 Hz, H-8a), 3.55 (3H, s, MTPA–OCH3), 3.57 (3H, s, MTPA–
OCH3), 3.87 (1H, dd, J = 13.1, 11.0 Hz, H-10a), 4.38 (1H, dd,
J = 11.0, 5.0 Hz, H-10b), 5.13 (1H, quint, J = 6.5 Hz, H-12), 5.35
(1H, d, J = 12.0 Hz, H-8), 5.81 (1H, d, J = 15.5 Hz, H-9), 6.00 (1H,
s, H-4), 6.32 (1H, dd, J = 15.5, 8.0 Hz, H-10), 7.38-7.43 (3H, m,
Ar–H), 7.43–7.47 (3H, m, Ar–H), 7.52–7.56 (2H, m, Ar–H),
7.60–7.64 (2H, m, Ar–H).
References and notes
1. Yamada, T.; Iritani, M.; Doi, M.; Minoura, K.; Ito, T.; Numata, A. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 2001, 3046.
2. Yamada, T.; Iritani, M.; Minoura, K.; Kawai, K.; Numata, A. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2004, 2131.
3. Yamada, T.; Iritani, M.; Ohishi, H.; Tanaka, K.; Minoura, K.; Doi, M.; Numata, A.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 3079. and references cited therein.
4. Yamada, T.; Doi, M.; Shigeta, H.; Muroga, Y.; Hosoe, S.; Numata, A.; Tanaka, R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 4192.
5. Muroga, Y.; Yamada, T.; Numata, A.; Tanaka, R. J. Antibiot. 2008, 61, 615.
6. Yamada, T.; Muroga, Y.; Tanaka, R. Mar. drugs 2009, 7, 249.
7. Muroga, Y.; Yamada, T.; Numata, A.; Tanaka, R. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 7580.
8. Yamada, T.; Muroga, Y.; Shigeta, H.; Numata, A.; Tanaka, R. J. Antibiot. 2009, 62,
353.
9. Muroga, Y.; Yamada, T.; Numata, A.; Tanaka, R. Helv. Chim. Acta 2010, 93, 542.
10. Quang, D. N.; Stadler, M.; Fournier, J.; Tomita, A.; Hashimoto, T. Tetrahedron
2006, 62, 6349.
Compuond 3b: FABMS m/z (rel. int.): 761 ([M+H]+, 14.9%).
HRFABMS m/z found 761.1940 [M+H]+ (calcd for C36H3635ClF6O9,