J. Lee et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 4203–4205
4205
Education, Science and Technology (the Regional Core Research
Program/Anti-aging and Well-being Research Center)
References and notes
1. Sausville, E. A.; Zaharevitz, D.; Gussio, R.; Meijer, L.; Louarn-Leost, M.; Kunick,
C.; Schultz, R.; Lahusen, T.; Headlee, D.; Stinson, S.; Arbuck, S. G.; Senderowicz,
A. Pharmacol. Ther. 1999, 82, 285.
2. Schwartz, G. K. Cell Cycle (Georgetown, Tex) 2002, 1, 122.
3. Shapiro, G. I. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 24, 1770.
4. Malumbres, M.; Barbacid, M. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2009, 9, 153.
5. McInnes, C. Drug Discovery Today 2008, 13, 875.
6. Xie, F.; Zhao, H.; Zhao, L.; Lou, L.; Hu, Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 275.
7. Jones, C. D.; Andrews, D. M.; Barker, A. J.; Blades, K.; Byth, K. F.; Finlay, M. R. V.;
Geh, C.; Green, C. P.; Johannsen, M.; Walker, M.; Weir, H. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2008, 18, 6486.
8. Seong, Y. S.; Min, C.; Li, L.; Yang, J. Y.; Kim, S. Y.; Cao, X.; Kim, K.; Yuspa, S. H.;
Chung, H. H.; Lee, K. S. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 7384.
9. Vilchis-Reyes, M. A.; Zentella, A.; Martínez-Urbina, M. A.; Guzmán, A.; Vargas,
O.; Apan, M. T. R.; Gallegos, J. L. V.; Díaz, E. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 379.
10. Kitagawa, M.; Higashi, H.; Takahashi, I. S.; Okabe, T.; Ogino, H.; Taya, Y.;
Hishimura, S.; Okuyama, A. Oncogene 1994, 9, 2549.
11. Procedure for the synthesis of (3S,4S)-pyrrolidine-3,4-diol:
Figure 1. Comparison of the X-ray structures of compounds 8 (purple), 11 (green)
and 15 (grey) in the ATP pocket of CDK2.
A
mixture of diethyl L-tartarate (50.0 g, 0.242 mol), MOMCl (46.0 ml,
0.605 mol), and DIPEA (127.0 mL, 0.726 mol) in DCM was stirred for 10 h at
rt. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the remaining
residue was dissolved in EA. The organic layer was washed with water and
brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure.
The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel using Hex/EA
(1:1, v/v) as eluent to give (2R,3R)-diethyl 2,3-bis(methoxymethoxy)succinate
in a yield of 99%. Conventional reduction of ester using LiAlH4 provided (2S,3S)-
is rotated about 90° to make it perpendicular to the plane of the
phenol ring. In both orientations, the pyrrolidine-3,4-diol makes
similar interactions with Lys33 and Asp145.
2,3-bis(methoxymethoxy)butane-1,4-diol in
Bis(methoxymethoxy)butane-1,4-diol (50.0 g, 0.237 mol) in 200 mL THF was
added by dropwise to mixture of PPh3 (137 g, 0.522 mol), I2 (133 g,
a
yield of 98%. 2,3-
The C log P value of the compound can be one factor that affects
both enzymatic and cell growth inhibition.14–16 Compounds having
a low inhibitory activity against both enzymes and cells are substi-
tuted with piperidine, piperazine, and morpholine groups which
provide low C log P values (À0.12, À0.12, 0.03 and 0.44 for 20,
18, 17 and 21, respectively).17 Introduction of n-hexyl and cyclo-
heptyl groups increased the C log P values to 2.8 and provided im-
proved cell growth inhibition. The result that compound 12
showed better cellular activity than 9 and 10 even though 12
was one order of magnitude less potent for both CDK1 and CDK2
supports this speculation. Compounds having short alkyl chains
did not show correlation between enzymatic and cellular inhibi-
tory activity. It can be partially accounted by the offsetting effect
of the binding mode alteration and the lipophilicity change.
In summary, a series of new 2-(2-aminopyrimidin-4-yl)phenol
derivatives were synthesized as potential antitumor compounds.
Pyrrolidine-3,4-diol was found as a new substituent for 2-(2-
aminopyrimidin-4-yl)phenol scaffolds. A series of (3S,4S)-1-(3-(2-
aminopyrimidin-4-yl)-4-hydroxyphenyl)pyrrolidine-3,4-diols was
synthesized and found to be decent CDK1 and CDK2 inhibitors.
a
0.522 mol), and imidazole (72 g, 1.0 mol) in 1.3 L THF. After stirring for 1 h at
rt, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the remaining
residue was dissolved in EA. The organic layer was washed with water and
brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure.
The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel using Hex/EA
(1:1, v/v) as eluent to give (5R,6R)-5,6-bis(iodomethyl)-2,4,7,9-tetraoxadecane
in a yield of 45%. 1H NMR(400 MHz, CDCl3) d (ppm) 3.30 (2H, m), 3.38 (2H, m),
3.43 (6H, s), 3.99 (2H, m), 4.75 (4H, m); ESI MS(m/e) = 430 [M+1].
12. Shoemaker, R. H. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 6, 813.
13. The CDK2 protein was produced and purified following the protocol in the
published paper (Rosenblatt et al. J. Mol. Biol. 1993, 230, 1317). The apo-protein
crystals were grown at 4 °C by the hanging drop vapor diffusion method
against 0.2 M Hepes, pH 7.4. Crystals were soaked in a solution containing
0.5 mM of the compounds for more than 24 h and transferred to the
cryoprotectant solution (0.2 M Hepes, pH 7.4, 35% ethylene glycol). X-ray
data were collected with a MacScience DIP2030 imaging plate area detector
and were processed using the DENZO/SCALEPACK program. Crystals were diffracted
to the 2.3 Å resolution and the binding of the compound was clearly visible in
the electron density map. The structure was refined using the CNX program. The
coordinate of CDK2 and the compound 11 complex has been deposited in the
Protein Data Bank (PDB ID 3S2P).
14. Benites, J.; Valderrama, J.; Taper, H.; Buc Calderon, P. Invest. New Drugs 2010, 1.
15. Hollósy, F.; Seprödi, J.; Örfi, L.; Erös, D.; Kéri, G.; Idei, M. J. Chromatogr., B 2002,
780, 355.
16. Hudgins, W. R.; Shack, S.; Myers, C. E.; Samid, D. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1995, 50,
1273.
Acknowledgments
17. Determined by CSChem software.
This research was supported by a Bisa Research Grant of
Keimyung University and a grant from the Korean Ministry of