(or sulfide)-catalyzed [3 þ 2], [3 þ 4], or [3 þ 6] annulation
reactions of MBH derivatives via allylic P (or S)-ylide
intermediates;7 unfortunately, the asymmetric variants
have been poorly developed,8 except for a notable chiral
bisphosphine-catalyzed [3 þ 2] example presented by
Barbas very recently.9 Therefore, the development of a
catalytic system that can realize the asymmetric annula-
tions of MBH derivatives to construct enantioenriched
carbo- or heterocycles would be highly desirable, especially
with more air-stable Lewis basic amines.
Recently, we reported an electrophilic process to deliver
2-oxindoles bearing C3-quaternary stereocenters through
asymmetric allylic alkylationof MBH carbonatesof isatins
(Scheme 1, approach a) by the catalysis of β-isocupreidine
1a (β-ICD; see Table 1).10 We envisioned that, as a result of
the highly electron-withdrawing ability of the 2-oxindole
motif, the vinylogous proton of the ammonium I would be
easily removed by the in situ generated tert-butoxy anion in
the absence of an additional acidic reagent, thus forming a
nucleophilic N-ylide II (approach b).11 Subsequently, an
asymmetric [3 þ 2] annulation to construct chiral five-
membered spirocyclic 2-oxindoles, which have been wit-
nessed in numerous biologically active materials,12 would
be achieved by the reaction with suitable activated unsa-
turated systems.13 It should be noted that tertiary amines
have been rarely applied in the transformations of MBH
adducts via allylic N-ylides even in a racemic manner.14
chalcone, etc., resulted in no success at room tempera-
ture,15 we were able to detect a spirocyclic 2-oxindole
product 4a incorporating a cyclopentadiene moiety when
a propargyl phenyl sulfone 3a was applied (3a easily
isomerizes to allenyl phenyl sulfone by base catalysis, which
should be the actual electrophile),16 albeit in very low yield
(Table 1, entry 1). Hence the expected [3 þ 2] annulation
occurred, followed by a domino isomerization sequence to
give the thermally more stable conjugated counterpart.
Nevertheless, sulfone 3a was consumed rapidly because of
its self-dimerization and other side reactions by nucleo-
philic amine catalysis.17,18 To our delight, we observed that
chiral β-ICD 1a exhibited a highly catalytic preference to
[3 þ 2] annulation pathway, though the yield was still
unsatisfying due to the sluggish conversion, while the
enantioselectivity was inspiring (entry 2).19 The reaction
˚
could be slightly enhanced by adding 4 A molecular sieves
(entry 3). We reasoned that the acidic hydroxyl group of β-
ICD 1a would affect the deprotonation of intermediate I to
generate active N-ylide II. Later it was very pleasing to find
that the desired reaction could be greatly accelerated by the
catalysis of β-isoquinidine 1b,20 and more importantly,
excellent enantioselectivity was obtained (entry 4).21 Sub-
sequently, a few modified β-ICD derivatives 1cꢀ1i in
consideration of steric and electronic features were further
prepared and tested (entries 5ꢀ11), and the best results in
regard to yield and ee were gained by applying a new β-
ICD O-MOM ether 1casthe catalyst(entry 5). Itshould be
noted that the catalytic efficacy was dramatically de-
creased when β-ICD O-triflate 1e and β-isocinchonine 1i
were used, indicating that the electron-rich characteristics
of Lewis bases are significant to the catalysis (entries 7 and
11). In addition, the annulation could proceed smoothly at
Scheme 1. Tertiary Amine-Catalyzed Asymmetric Transfor-
mations of MBH Carbonates Derived from Isatins
(13) For selected catalytic asymmetric reactions to construct chiral
spirocyclic 2-oxindoles, see: (a) Trost, B. M.; Cramer, N.; Silverman, S. M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12396. (b) Hojo, D.; Noguchi, K.; Hirano, M.;
Tanaka, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 5820. (c) Chen, X.-H.; Wei, Q.;
Luo, S.-W.; Xiao, H.; Gong, L.-Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 13819. (d)
Bencivenni, G.; Wu, L.-Y.; Mazzanti, A.; Giannichi, B.; Pesciaioli, F.; Song,
M.-P.; Bartoli, G.; Melchiorre, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7200. (e)
€
Antonchick, A. P.; Gerding-Reimers, C.; Catarinella, M.; Schurmann, M.;
Preut, H.; Ziegler, S.; Rauh, D.; Waldmann, H. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 735. (f)
Voituriez, A.; Pinto, N.; Neel, M.; Retailleau, P.; Marinetti, A. Chem.;Eur.
J. 2010, 16, 12541. (g) Jiang, X.; Cao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, L.; Shen, F.; Wang,
R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 15328.
(14) Viswambharan, B.; Selvakumar, K.; Madhavan, S.; Shanmugam,
P. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2108.
(15) For phosphine-catalyzed annulation of bromo derivatives of
MBH adducts of isatin in a racemic form, see: Selvakumar, K.;
Vaithiyanathan, V.; Shanmugam, P. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2826.
(16) Liu, H.; Leow, D.; Huang, K.-W.; Tan, C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009, 131, 7212.
Although the initial screenings in the DABCO-catalyzed
reactions of MBH carbonate 2a with a few activated
olefins, such as methyl acrylate, vinyl phenyl sulfone, and
(17) (a) For a review, see: Back, T. G.; Clary, K. N.; Gao, D. Chem.
Rev. 2010, 110, 4498. (b) Cowen, B. J.; Saunders, L. B.; Miller, S. J. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6105. (c) Denis, J.-B.; Masson, G.; Retailleau,
P.; Zhu, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 5356.
(18) Propargyl phenyl sulfone 3a was also consumed rapidly in the
presence of a tertiary phosphine such as Ph3P.
(8) (a) Wang, Q.-G.; Zhu, S.-F.; Ye, L.-W.; Zhou, C.-Y.; Sun, X.-L.;
Tang, Y.; Zhou, Q.-L. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 1914. (b) Deng,
H.-P.; Wei, Y.; Shi, M. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3348.
(9) Tan, B.; Candeias, N. R.; Barbas, C. F., III. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2011, 133, 4672.
(10) Peng, J.; Huang, X.; Cui, H.-L.; Chen, Y.-C. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4260.
(11) For a review, see: Gaunt, M. J.; Johansson, C. C. C. Chem. Rev.
2007, 107, 5596.
(12) (a) Mohr, J. T.; Krout, M. R.; Stoltz, B. M. Nature 2008, 455,
323. (b) Miller, K. A.; Tsukamoto, S.; Williams, R. M. Nat. Chem. 2009,
1, 63. (c) Greshock, T. J.; Grubbs, A. W.; Jiao, P.; Wicklow, D. T.; Gloer,
J. B.; Williams, R. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3573. (d)
Galliford, C. V.; Scheidt, K. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8748.
(19) Simple quinidine or (DHQD)2AQN showed no catalytic activ-
ity, while quinidine O-Me or quinine O-Me ether afforded poor results
(28%, 30% ee, or 36%, ꢀ46% ee, respectively).
€
€
(20) (a) Waldmann, H.; Khedkar, V.; Duckert, H.; Schurmann, M.;
Oppel, I. M.; Kumar, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6869. (b) For a
review, see: Marcelli, T.; van Maarseveen, J. H.; Hiemstra, H. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7496.
(21) Other solvents(toluene, PhCF3, DCM, CHCl3, and 1,4-dioxane)
could be well tolerated (>80% yield, 85ꢀ90% ee).
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 17, 2011
4585