´
4709
M. Ilic et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 4705–4709
CH3
lipoxygenase activity. Compounds that combine in the same mole-
cule thrombin inhibitory activity with lipid peroxidation and
lipoxygenase inhibition would be expected to display a synergistic
action in the treatment of thrombosis. This makes compounds 10
and 11 interesting candidates for further investigations towards
multiple antithrombotic drugs.
CH3
H3C
HO
O
COOH
CH3
Trolox
Acknowledgments
CH3
O
NH2
NH
This work was supported by Slovenian Research Agency Grant
No. P1-208. We wish to thank Dr. C. Hansch and Biobyte Corp.,
201 West 4th Str., Suite 204, Claremont, CA 91711, USA, for free ac-
cess to the C-QSAR program and Dr. Roger Pain from J. Stefan Insti-
tute, Ljubljana for critical reading of the manuscript.
X
N
O
EtOOC
N
CH3
R = 3-F;4-F; 3,5-difluoro; 4,5-difluoro
References and notes
R
10a-d: X = H, H
10e-h: X = O
1. (a) Lopez, A. D.; Mathers, C. D.; Ezzati, M.; Jamison, D. T.; Murray, C. J. L. Lancet
2. Jeffrey, I.; Weitz, J. I.; Hirsh, J.; Samama, M. M. Chest 2008, 133, 234S.
Figure 1. Structures of TroloxÒ and compounds 10a–h.
´
3. (a) Ilic, M.; Kikelj, D.; Ilaš, J. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. in press.; (b) Morphy, J. R.;
Rankovic, Z. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 6523.
4. Muro, S.; Muzykantov, V. R. Curr. Pharm. Design 2005, 11, 2383.
5. Doerschuk, C. M.; Quinlan, W. M.; Doyle, N. A.; Bullard, D. C.; Vestweber, D.;
Jones, M. L.; Takei, F.; Ward, P. A.; Beaudet, A. L. J. Immunol. 1996, 157, 4609.
6. Pinsky, D. J.; Liao, H.; Lawson, C. A.; Yan, S. F.; Chen, J. X.; Carmeliet, P.;
Loskutoff, D. J.; Stern, D. M. J. Clin. Invest. 1998, 102, 919.
7. Gregg, D.; de Carvalho, D. D.; Kovacic, H. Antioxid. Redox Sign. 2004, 6, 757.
8. Hatmi, M.; Samama, M.-M.; Elalamy, I. J. Mal. Vascul. 2006, 31, 4.
9. Schaub, R. G.; Yamashita, A. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 1986, 45, 343.
lipoxygenase inhibition assay may therefore be used as a simple
qualitative screen for lipoxygenase inhibitory activity. Although
most of the LO inhibitors are antioxidants or free radical scaveng-
ers,26 the relationship between LO inhibition and the ability of the
inhibitors to chelate and reduce the active site Fe3+, or compete
with arachidonic acid for binding to the enzyme active site, is well
known.14 Perusal of the soybean LO inhibition values (Table 1)
shows that, with the exception of 10b, 10d, and 10h, which display
better inhibition than caffeic acid, the standard inhibitor, other
compounds were devoid of activity. The active compounds were
characterized by moderate values of interaction with AAPH, but
low interaction values with DPPH, showing that lipid peroxidation
activity is not always accompanied by DPPH radical scavenging
ability and vice versa.27 This can be attributed to the different
chemical reactions involved in the two assays. Thus, although com-
pounds 11a–d interacted strongly with DPPH, they did not inhibit
soybean lipoxygenase. Although it appears that LO inhibition is
connected to the 6-substitution pattern, further experiments are
needed in order to explain the absence of activity in other deriva-
tives of the 6-substituted series.
10. Cabre, A.; Girona, J.; Vallve, J. C.; Masana, L. J. Cell. Physiol. 2004, 198, 230.
ˇ
11. Štefanic Anderluh, P.; Anderluh, M.; Ilaš, J.; Mravljak, J.; Sollner Dolenc, M.;
Stegnar, M.; Kikelj, D. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 3110.
ˇ
12. Ilaš, J.; Jakopin, Z.; Borštnar, T.; Stegnar, M.; Kikelj, D. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51,
5617.
13. For experimental protocols see Ref. 12
14. Pontiki, E.; Hadjipavlou-Litina, D. Curr. Enzyme Inhib. 2005, 1, 11.
15. Largeron, M.; Lockhart, B.; Pfeiffer, B.; Fleury, M. B. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 5043.
16. Blattes, E.; Lockhart, B.; Lestage, P.; Schwendimann, L.; Gressens, P.; Fleury, M.
B.; Largeron, M. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 1282.
ˇ
17. Kikelj, D.; Suhadolc, E.; Urleb, U.; Zbontar, U. J. Heterocyclic Chem. 1993, 30, 597.
18. Mitsunobu, O. Synthesis 1981, 1.
19. Abdel-Magid, A. F.; Carson, K. G.; Harris, B. D.; Maryanoff, C. A.; Shah, R. D. J.
Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 3849.
20. Roger, R.; Neilson, D. G. Chem. Rev. 1961, 61, 179.
21. Blois, M. S. Nature 1958, 181, 1199.
22. Kontogiorgis, C.; Hadjipavlou-Litina, D. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Ch. 2003, 18, 63.
23. Biobyte Corp., C-QSAR Database, 201 West 4th Str., Suite 204, Claremont CA,
California 91711, USA.
24. Liegois, C.; Lermusieau, G.; Colin, S. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 1129.
25. Taraborewala, R. B.; Kauffman, J. M. J. Pharm. Sci. 1990, 79, 173.
26. Muller, K. Arch. Pharm. 1994, 327, 3.
27. Curini, M.; Epifano, F.; Genovese, S.; Menghini, L.; Ricci, D.; Fraternale, D.;
Giamperi, L.; Bucchini, A.; Bellacchio, E. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2006, 1, 1141.
In conclusion, of the compounds 10a–h and 11a–d possessing
thrombin inhibition activity, 11a–d were found to possess good
radical scavenging activity, 10a, 10d, and 10f inhibited lipid perox-
idation of linoleic acid, and 10b, 10d, and 10h inhibited soybean