Properties of lanthanide complexes
2. Parker D. Excitement in f Block : Structure, Dynamics and Function of
Nine-Coordinate Chiral Lanthanide Complexes in Aqueous Media.
Chem Soc Rev 2004;33:156.
3. Sabbatini N, Guardigli M, Lehn J-M. Luminescent Lanthanide Com-
plexes as Photochemical Supramolecular Devices. Coord Chem Rev
1993;123:201.
4. Bünzli J-CG, Piguet C. Lanthanide-Containing Molecular and
Supramolecular Polymetallic Functional Assemblies. Chem Rev
2002;102:1897.
5. Weibel N, Charbonnière LJ, Guardigli M, Roda A, Ziessel R. Engineer-
ing of Highly Luminescent LanthanideTags Suitable for Protein Label-
ing and Time-Resolved Luminescence Imaging. J Am Chem Soc
2004;126:4888.
6. Yuan J, Matsumoto K. A New Tetradentate ß-Diketonate-Europium
Chelate That Can Be Covalently Bound to Proteins for Time-Resolved
Fluoroimmunoassay. Anal Chem 1998;70:596.
7. Scorilas A, Bjartell A, Lilja H, Moller C, Diamandis EP. Streptavidin-
Polyvinylamine Conjugates Labeled with a Europium Chelate: Appli-
cations in Immunoassay, Immunohistochemistry, and Microarrays.
Clin Chem 2000;46(9):1450.
8. Saha AK, Kross K, Kloszewski ED, Upson DA, Toner JL, Snow RA, Black
CDV, Desai VC. Time-resolved Fluorescence of a New Europium-
Chelate Complex: Demonstration of Highly Sensitive Detection of
Protein and DNA Samples. J Am Chem Soc 1993;115:11032.
9. Christopoulos TK, Diamandis EP. Enzymically Amplified Time-
Resolved Fluorescence Immunoassay with Terbium Chelates. Anal
Chem 1992;64:342.
10. Parker D. Coord. Luminescent Lanthanide Sensors for pH, pO2 and
Selected Anions. Chem Rev 2000;205:109.
11. Zhao XQ, Zhao B, Wei S, Cheng P. Synthesis, Structures, and Lumines-
cent and Magnetic Properties of Ln-Ag Heterometal-Organic Frame-
works. Inorg Chem 2000;48:11048.
12. Gunnlaugsson T, Leonard JP, Sénéchal K, Harte AJ. pH Responsive
Eu(III)-Phenanthroline Supramolecular Conjugate: Novel“Off-On-Off ”
Luminescent Signaling in the Physiological pH Range. J Am Chem Soc
2003;125:12062.
13. Gunnlaugsson T, Mac Dónail DA, Parker D. Lanthanide Macrocyclic
Quinolyl Conjugates as Luminescent Molecular-Level Devices. J Am
Chem Soc 2001;123:12866.
14. Reany O, Gunnlaugsson T, Parker D. Selective Signalling of Zinc Ions
by Modulation of Terbium Luminescence. Chem Commun 2000;473.
15. Charbonnière LJ, Ziessel R, Montalti M, Prodi L, Zaccheroni N, Boehme
C, Wipff G. Luminescent Lanthanide Complexes of a Bis-bipyridine-
phosphine-oxide Ligand asTools for Anion Detection. J Am Chem Soc
2002;124:7779.
16. Hanaoka K, Kikuchi K, Kojima H, Urano Y, Nagano T. Development of
a Zinc Ion-Selective Luminescent Lanthanide Chemosensor for Bio-
logical Applications. J Am Chem Soc 2004;126:12470.
17. Gunnlaugsson T, Leonard JP. Responsive Lanthanide Luminescent
Cyclen Complexes: from Switching/Sensing to Supramolecular Archi-
tectures. Chem Commun 2005;3114.
18. Gschneidner KA, Eyring L. Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of
Rare Earths. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1979.
2.5 nm, respectively). The luminescence emission spectra of
[LnL(NO3)3]·H2O (Ln = Sm, Eu, Tb, Dy) in solid state (the excitation
and emission slit widths were 1.0 and 2.5 nm, Table 3, Fig. 1a–d)
were recorded at room temperature. The efficient energy transfer
from ligand to center ions (antenna effect) is one of key factors to
achieve lanthanide characteristic luminescence (30,31). It is
shown in Fig. 1 that these four complexes all show the character-
istic emissions of Sm3+, Eu3+, Tb3+ or Dy3+. This indicates that the
ligand L is a good organic chelator to absorb and transfer energy
to lanthanide ions. The ligand has multiple aromatic rings with a
semirigid skeleton structure, so it is a strong luminescence sub-
stance(32). InthespectrumofEucomplex, therelativeintensityof
5D0 → 7F2 is more intense than that of 5D0 → 7F1; the most intensity
ratio value h(5D0 → 7F2/5D0 → 7F1) is 2.63, showing that the Eu (b)
ion does not lie in a centro-symmetric coordination site (33).
A triplet excited state T1 is localized on one ligand only and is
independent of the lanthanide nature (34). In order to acquire the
triplet excited stateT1 of the ligand L, the phosphorescence spec-
trum of the Gd(III) complex was measured at 77 K in a methanol–
ethanol mixture (v : v, 1:1). The triplet state energy level T1 of the
ligand L, which was calculated from the shortest-wavelength
phosphorescence band (35), was 23,923 cm-1. This energy level is
4
above the lowest excited resonance level G5/2 of Sm(III)
(17,924 cm-1), 5D0 of Eu(III) (17,286 cm-1), 5D4 of Tb(III)
(20,545 cm-1) and 4F9/2 of Dy(III) (21,144 cm-1). Thus, the absorbed
energy could be transferred from ligand to the Sm, Eu, Tb or Dy
ions. We can deduce that the triplet state energy level T1 of this
ligand L matches better the lowest resonance level of Tb(III) (Dn =
3378 cm-1) than Sm(III) (Dn = 5999 cm-1), Eu(III) (Dn = 6637 cm-1)
and Dy(III) (Dn = 2779 cm-1) ions, because such large or small Dn
could result in the non-radiative deactivation of the lanthanide
emitting state and quench the luminescence of the complexes
(36).
Conclusion
According to the data and discussion above, the novel
unsymmetrical
tripodal
ligand
butyl-N,N-bis[(2′-
benzylaminofomyl)phenoxyl)ethyl]-amine (L) can form stable
solid complexes with lanthanide nitrates. When the ligand
formed the lanthanide complexes, obvious changes in IR spectra
were observed. In the complexes, lanthanide ions were coordi-
nated to the C=O oxygen atoms of the ligand L. The character-
ization of these complexes demonstrates 1:1 (M : L) type
coordination stoichiometries. Thus, the lanthanide ion could be
effectively encapsulated and protected by the coordinated
ligands. The luminescent properties of the Sm, Eu, Tb and Dy
complexes in solid state were investigated. Under UV light exci-
tation, the complexes exhibited characteristic luminescence of
samarium, europium, terbium and dysprosium ions. This indi-
cates that the ligand L is a good organic chelator to absorb and
transfer energy to lanthanide ions. The lowest triplet state energy
level of the ligand indicates that the triplet state energy level (T1)
of the ligand matches better the resonance level of Tb(III) than
other lanthanide ions.
19. Piguet C, Bünzli J-CG, Bernardinelli G, Hopfgartner G, Petoud S,
Schaad O. Lanthanide Podates with Predetermined Structural and
Photophysical Properties: Strongly Luminescent Self-Assembled Het-
erodinuclear d-f Complexes with a Segmental Ligand Containing
Heterocyclic Imines and Carboxamide Binding Units. J Am Chem Soc
1996;118:6681.
20. Zhang J, Tang Y, Tang N, Tan MY, Liu WS, Yu KB. Novel Three-
Dimensional Network Generated from The Reaction of Eu(NO3)3 with
an Amide Type Tripodal Ligand. J Chem Soc Dalton Trans 2002;832.
21. Hamann CS, Zelewsky AV, Barbieri A, Barigelletti F, Muller G, Riehl JP,
Neels A. Diastereoselective Formation of Chiral Tris-Cyclometalated
Iridium (III) Complexes: Characterization and Photophysical Proper-
ties. J Am Chem Soc 2004;126:9339.
22. Blackman AG. The Coordination Chemistry of Tripodal Tetraamine
Ligands. Polyhedron 2005;24:1.
23. Michio K. The Dual Fluorescence Nature of Some N-
Monosubstituted Salicylamides. Bull Chem Soc Jpn 1976;49:2679.
24. Ward K Jr. The Chlorinated Ethylamines: a New Type of Vesicant.
J Am Chem Soc 1935;57:914.
25. Nakagawa K, Amita K, Mizuno H, Inoue Y, Hakushi T. Preparation
of Some Lanthanoid Picrates and the Behavior of Their Water of
Hydration. Bull Chem Soc Jpn 1987;60:2037.
References
1. Parker D, Dickins RS, Puschmann H, Crossland C, Howard JAK. Being
Excited by Lanthanide Coordination Complexes: Aqua Species,
Chirality, Excited-State Chemistry, and Exchange Dynamics. Chem
Rev 2002;102:1977.
Luminescence 2011; 26: 218–222
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/luminescence