DOI: 10.1002/anie.201102065
Energy Transfer
Using a Photoacid Generator to Switch the Direction of Electronic
Energy Transfer in a Molecular Triad**
Delphine Hablot, Anthony Harriman,* and Raymond Ziessel*
Over the past decade there has been a renaissance of interest
in the processes by which electronic energy can be trans-
ported around an organized molecular array with minimal
loss.[1] The motivation for this research stems from a desire to
apply, at a molecular level, the lessons acquired from our
ever-deepening understanding of the natural light-harvesting
machinery[2] that powers bacterial and green-plant photosyn-
thesis and other biological processes.[3] A key requirement of
all such functional units is the need to move the photonic
energy to a site where chemical reactions are initiated.[4]
Paramount to the successful design of artificial prototypes
able to operate in this way is the logical positioning of
individual units in a way that favors vectorial electronic
energy transfer (EET) along the molecular axis[5,6] or by way
of some other preferred pathway.[7,8] An obvious, and indeed
enviable, extension for these materials is to devise a simple
means by which the EET flow can be reversed, while
maintaining very high efficiency. Such switching protocols
might involve a change in solvent polarity[9] or temperature,[10]
coordination of substrates,[11] light-induced conformational
exchange,[12] or modulation of the excitation wavelength.[13]
Herein, we introduce a new concept for alternating the EET
direction. Our approach, which works in both liquid and solid
states, uses a photoacid generator (PAG) to trigger the switch.
The target molecule was constructed with a central 1,4-
oxo-3,6-diphenylpyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole unit, DPP, connecting
two disparate Bodipy dyes; namely, a blue dye absorbing
strongly at 650 nm and a green dye with prominent absorption
centered at 695 nm. Note the green dye is readily protonated
at the amine sites to give a blue dye that exhibits an
absorption maximum at 630 nm. As such, protonation of the
green dye is involved in the switching mechanism; this
observation in itself is not a new idea but follows from original
work by Armaroli et al.[14] A key feature of our design
principle requires that the DPP core absorbs and emits at
slightly higher energy than either of the termini. An
appropriate prototypic compound is B(DPP)G, as shown in
Scheme 1. Preparation of this triad involves cross-coupling
the bromo function of the DPP unit with the dedicated
terminal alkynes B and G in the presence of Pd0.[15] The
corresponding symmetrical controls, B(DPP)B and G-
(DPP)G, were prepared using a slight excess of the corre-
Scheme 1. Molecular formulae of the molecular triads used herein and
their respective abbreviations.
sponding starting dye B or G, respectively. The mixed dye,
B(DPP)G, was prepared by first cross-coupling the blue dye
with the central platform and then attaching the green dye in
a separate step (Scheme 1). The boron substituents import
polarity to assist purification by column chromatography. The
peripheral units attached to the Bodipy dyes were selected in
order to modulate the optical properties and, in the case of
the green dye, to provide the protonation venue. These new
dyes are soluble in common organic solvents and give well-
defined proton NMR spectra in keeping with the lack of
aggregation in solution (see the Supporting Information).
The isolated DPP unit is highly fluorescent (lFLU
=
538 nm) in solution (see the Supporting Information for a
summary of the photophysical properties of the isolated
dyes); for example in dioxane at 208C, the emission quantum
yield (FF) is 0.87 and the excited-singlet-state lifetime (tS) is
4.9 ns. On selective excitation at 470 nm of the DPP unit
present in B(DPP)B, FF falls to 0.001 while tS is decreased to
5.7 ps. There is concomitant appearance of strong emission
from the blue dye and, on the basis of comparing the
excitation and absorption spectra, it is concluded that intra-
molecular EET is highly efficient (i.e., PEET = 99.8%) in this
system (see the Supporting Information for full details); the
corresponding rate constant, kEET, is 17.5 ꢀ 1010 sÀ1. Indeed,
EET is promoted by a moderately high spectral overlap
integral (JDA = 0.00060 cm) and thermodynamic driving force,
although the center-to-center separation distance (R = 15 ꢁ)
is reasonably high. Similar behavior holds for G(DPP)G in
dioxane solution, although the spectral overlap integral is
[*] D. Hablot, Dr. R. Ziessel
LCOSA, Ecole Europꢀenne de Chimie, Polymꢁres et Matꢀriaux
CNRS, 25 rue Becquerel, 67087 Strasbourg Cedex 02 (France)
E-mail: ziessel@unistra.fr
Prof. Dr. A. Harriman
Molecular Photonics Laboratory, School of Chemistry, Bedson Bldg
Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU (UK)
E-mail: anthony.harriman@ncl.ac.uk
[**] This work was supported by the CNRS (UMR 7515), EPSRC, and by
Newcastle University.
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7833 –7836
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
7833