(Figure 1, eq 2). This methodology affords complete con-
trol of the two contiguous stereogenic centers based on the
chirality of the organocatalyst and sulfimine employed as
well as on the transiton state (metal-chelate versus nonmetal
chelate transition states, MCTS and NMCTS, respec-
tively) that the organometallic species adopts.
With R-fluoro-N-sulfinylaldimine 4 in hand, we exam-
ined the addition of a number of organometallic nucleo-
philes to add unprecendented diversity to the primary
β-fluoroamine scaffold and access derivatives previously
unavailable. We first explored Grignard reagents (Scheme 2)
and found a wide range of diverse R groups were tolerated
affording the sulfinamide-protected primary β-fluoroa-
mines 8aꢀc in good isolated yields (72ꢀ92%) and >20:1
dr (as determined by 19F NMR).22 The anti-diastereomer
of the β-fluoroamine formed predominantly as expected
due to the known metal-chelated transition state (see inset
under arrow) for 8a and 8b. The syn-diastereomer was
formed in the case of 8c, as a result of additional coordina-
tion to the acetal oxygen, in accordance with the work of
Ellman.23
Key to the success of this approach is the ability to trap
the incipient chiral R-fluoroaldehyde with the Ellman tert-
butanesulfonamide toformthe correspondingR-fluoro-N-
sulfinylaldimine in high diastereomeric ratio (dr). A number
of conditions were surveyed (time, desiccant, equivalents
of NFSI) for the conversion of hydrocinnamaldehyde 1 to
β-fluoro-N-sulfinylaldimine 4 (Scheme 1). Ultimately, we
found that 5.0 equiv of NFSI, 20 mol % (R)-2, Ti(OEt)4 as
desiccant with (R)-tert-butanesulfinamide 3, and a 5 h
reaction time were optimial to deliver 4 in >20:1 dr (as
judged by 19F NMR). With these conditions, a variety of
diverse aldehydes could be converted into their corre-
sponding β-fluoro-N-sulfinylaldimines 5ꢀ7 in good iso-
lated yield (67ꢀ75%) for the two steps and with up to
>20:1 dr (Figure 1). Here, substrates with handles for
further elaboration were tolerated, such as the phthalimide
congener 5, a progenitor for basic amine analogues, the
olefin in 6 for subsequent manipulations, and a benzyl
protected alcohol congener 7.
Scheme 2. Scope of Grignard Addition to 4 To Deliver Sulfi-
namide-Protected Primary β-Fluoroamines 8aꢀc
Scheme 1. Optimization of R-Fluoro-N-sulfinyl Aldimine 4
Formation and Substrate Scope
a With 0.5 mmol of 4.
Due to the extensive diversity and availability of func-
tionalized boronic acids, we next explored boronic acid
additions. Under Batey’s mild Rh(I) catalysis protocol,24
a
diverse group of aryl boronic acids (electron-rich, biaryl,
and heterocyclic congeners) smoothly afforded the target
adducts 9aꢀc in 65ꢀ91% yield and once again in >20:1 dr
(Scheme 3). In this instance, the syn-diastereomers of the
β-fluoroamines are formed based on the known addition
of the aryl rhodium species through a nonmetal chelated
transition state.24
a Diastereomeric ratio (dr) determined by 19F NMR.
Lin and co-workers previously demonstrated that in-
dium-mediated allylations (In(0), allyl bromide in aqueous
NaBr) of (R)-N-tert-butanesulfinylimines provide the (S)-
adducts as confirmed by single X-ray crystallography.25
(12) Duggan, P. J.; Johnston, M.; March, T. L. J. Org. Chem. 2010,
75, 7365–7372.
(13) Appayee, C.; Brenner-Moyer, S. E. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3356–
3359.
(14) Malamakal, R. M.; Hess, W. R.; Davis, T. A. Org. Lett. 2010, 12,
2186–2189.
(20) Weix, D. J.; Shi, Y.; Ellman, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
1092–1093.
(15) Fadeyi, O. O.; Lindsley, C. W. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 943–946.
(16) Beeson, T. D.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 8826–8828.
(21) Brak, K.; Ellman, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3850–3851.
(22) Brinner, K. M.; Ellman, J. A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 2109–
2113.
(17) Cogan, D. A.; Ellman, J.A. . J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 269–
269.
(23) Cogan, D. A.; Liu, G.; Ellman, J. A. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 8883–
8904.
(18) Liu, G.; Cogan, D. A.; Owens, T. D.; Tang, T. P.; Ellman, T. P.
J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 1278–1284.
(19) Tang, T. P.; Ellman, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 7819–7832.
(24) Bolshan, Y.; Batey, R. A. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1481–1484.
(25) Sun, X.-W.; Liu, M.; Xu, M.-H.; Lin, G.-Q. Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
1259–1262.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 20, 2011
5685