8
B.B. Ivanova, M. Spiteller / Journal of Molecular Structure 1003 (2011) 1–9
assigned the observed solid-state phenomena as a result of the
interlayers CT-states. On the other side for the solid-state spectra
the corresponding CT bands both in the diffuse reflectance as well
as the fluorescence spectra are multicomponent splitted. The ob-
served relatively low value of the r2 of the non-linear curve-fitting
method, with the apply Gaussian function of 97.9% (Fig. 4) is a result
of the obtained low S/N value within 350–400 cmꢀ1, respectively
[20,21].
spectra of the crystals (Figure S2); UV–VIS–NIS transmission spectra
in solution within 190–1100 nm (Figure S3). Supplementary data
associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at
References
[1] J. Ma, J. Li, S. Song, Cryst. Growth Des. 5 (2005) 807.
[2] A. Côté, G. Shimizu, Coord. Chem. Rev. 244 (2003) 49.
[3] O. Yaghi, C. Davis, C. Li, H. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119 (1997) 2861.
[4] C. Swiegers, T. Malefetse, Chem. Rev. 100 (2000) 3483.
[5] Ch. Bosshard, J. Hulliger, M. Florsheimer, P. Günter, Organic Nonlinear Optical
Materials, Advances in Nonlinear Optics, Gordon and Breach Sci. Publishers, SA,
Postfach, Basel, 2001.
4. Conclusions
The design of the novel materials with NLO application and
crystal engineering will continue to play an important role in the
materials research. The tuning of the hydrogen bonding ability of
the chemical compounds, thus modify the optical properties of cor-
responding crystals, remain largely unaddressed. We have demon-
strated a possible application of the new class of NLO materials
based on 5-sulfosalicylate (SS5) crystals, making a parallel between
these and corresponding violurate and barbiturate derivatives,
thus indicating the advantages and limitations of each class of
the compounds. The key of our approaches lies in the excellent cor-
relation between theoretical properties and experimental crystal-
lographic results, and NLO phenomena in condense phase. The
following conclusions could be drawn: (a) The reasonable rate of
crystal growth and high thermal stability, good mechanical
strengths well as transparency in larger UV–VIS–NIR region, within
270–1100 nm are found; (b) The obtained first hyperpolarizability
btot values of the neutral and monocation of the SS5, 1.4–4.2 higher
than urea, using as standard is an indication for the advantages of
the co-crystals and corresponding ionic organic salts with SS5 as
marked NLO materials; The btot for the crystals of (1)–(3) about
5.4–8.4 times higher than urea. The lower value is obtained for
(3) calculated according the crystallographic 3D networks, formed
by the intermolecular hydrogen bonds and electrostatic forces. In
contrast the values for layers (or chains) motifs in (1) and (2), re-
sult to the higher btot data, thus assuming the coherent character
of the btot parameter, as molecular characteristic within the frame
of the molecular ensemble in the crystals, depending strongly of
the self-assembly; (c) The correlation between the crystallographic
data and electronic spectra and theoretical calculations of the ob-
tained crystals explain the observed relatively intensive band
about 300 nm in the diffuse reflectance spectra as principally as-
signed as a result of the interlayers CT-states.
[6] D. Chemla, J. Zyss, in: D. Chemla, J. Zyss (Eds.), Nonlinear Optical Properties of
Organic Molecules and Crystals, vol. 1, Academic Press, New York, 1987, pp.
23–187.
[7] H. Nalwa, T. Watanabe, S. Miyata, in: H.S. Nalwa, S. Miyata (Eds.), Nonlinear
Optics of Organic Molecules and Polymers, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1997, pp.
89–329.
[8] K. Sakada, Optical Properties of Photonic Crystals, Springer, Berlin, 2005.
[9] J. Reetz, S. Hoger, K. Harris, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 33 (1994) 181.
[10] J. Zyss, in: J. Zyss (Ed.), Molecular Monlinear Optics: Material Physics and
devices, Academic Press INC, San Diego, 1993.
[11] V. Geskin, C. Lambert, J. Bredas, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 15651.
[12] R. Wampler, A. Moad, C. Moad, R. Heiland, G. Simpson, Acc. Chem. Res. 40
(2007) 953.
[13] P. Sullivan, L. Dalton, Acc. Chem. Res. 43 (2010) 10.
[14] J. Wolff, R. Wortmann, Adv. Phys.Org. Chem. 32 (1999) 121.
[15] G. Smith, U.D. Wermuth, P.C. Healy, J. Chem. Crystallogr. 36 (2006) 841.
[16] G. Smith, U. Wermuth, P. Healy, Acta Crystallogr. C 61 (2005) o555.
[17] G. Smith, U. Wermuth, J. White, Acta Crystallogr. C 61 (2005) o105.
[18] G. Smith, U.D. Wermuth, J.M. White, Acta Cryst. E61 (2005) o313.
[19] M. Spassova, T. Kolev, I. Kanev, D. Jacquemin, B. Champagne, THEOCHEM 52
(2000) 528.
[20] B. Ivanova, M. Spiteller, J. Phys. Chem. A 114 (2010) 5099.
[21] B. Ivanova, M. Spiteller, Cryst. Growth Des. 10 (2008) 2470.
[22] B. Koleva, T. Kolev, R. Seidel, M. Spiteller, H. Mayer-Figge, W.S. Sheldrick, J.
Phys. Chem. A 113 (2009) 3088.
[23] G.M. Sheldrick, Acta Cryst. A64 (2008) 112.
[24] G.M. Sheldrick, Acta Cryst. D66 (2010) 479.
[25] G.M. Sheldrick, Acta Cryst. A46 (1990) 467.
[26] L. Farrugia, J. Appl. Cryst. 30 (1997) 565.
[27] R.H. Blessing, Acta Crystallogr. A51 (1995) 33.
[28] A.L. Spek, J. Appl. Cryst. 36 (2003) 7.
[29] Gaussian 98, M.J. Frisch, G.W. Trucks, H.B. Schlegel, G.E. Scuseria, M.A. Robb,
J.R. Cheeseman, V.G. Zakrzewski, J.A. Montgomery Jr., R.E. Stratmann, J.C.
Burant, S. Dapprich, J.M. Millam, A.D. Daniels, K.N. Kudin, M.C. Strain, Ö.
Farkas, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, M. Cossi, R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, C. Pomelli, C.
Adamo, S. Clifford, J. Ochterski, G.A. Petersson, P.Y. Ayala, Q. Cui, K. Morokuma,
P. Salvador, J.J. Dannenberg, D.K. Malick, A.D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J.B.
Foresman, J. Cioslowski, J.V. Ortiz, A.G. Baboul, B.B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A.
Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komáromi, R. Gomperts, R.L. Martin, D.J. Fox, T. Keith,
M.A. Al-Laham, C.Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, P.M.W. Gill, B.
Johnson, W. Chen, M.W. Wong, J.L. Andres, C. Gonzalez, M. Head-Gordon, E.S.
Replogle, J.A. Pople, Gaussian 98, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
Acknowledgements
[31] F. Jensen, Introduction to Computational Chemistry, Wiley, New York, 1999.
[32] M. Head-Gordon, J. Pople, M. Frisch, Chem. Phys. Lett. 153 (1988) 503.
[33] W. Stevens, M. Krauss, H. Basch, P. Jansen, Can. J. Chem. 70 (1992) 612.
[34] W. Hehre, L. Radom, P. Schleyer, J. Pople, Ab Initio Molecular Orbital Theory,
Wiley, New York, 1986.
[35] D. Woon, T. Dunning, J. Chem. Phys. 98 (1993) 1358.
[36] J. Foresman, M. Head-Gordon, J. Pople, M. Frisch, J. Phys. Chem. 96 (1992) 135.
[37] K. Wiberg, C. Hadad, J. Foresman, W. Chupka, J. Phys. Chem. 96 (1992) 10756.
[38] R. Bauernschmitt, R. Ahlrichs, Chem. Phys. Lett. 256 (1996) 454.
[39] R. Stratmann, G. Scuseria, M. Frisch, J. Chem. Phys. 109 (1998) 8218.
[40] A. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 96 (1992) 2155.
The authors thank the DAAD – Deutscher Akademischer Austausch
Dienst, for a grant within the priority program ‘‘Stability Pact South-
Eastern Europe’’ and gratefully thank the DFG – Deutsche Fors-
chungsgemeinschaft for Grants SPP 255/21-1 and SPP/22-1. The
authors also thank the central instrumental laboratories for struc-
tural analysis at TU Dortmund University of Technology (Germany)
and the analytical and computational laboratories at the Institute of
Environmental Research (INFU) at the TU Dortmund (Germany).
[41] Y. Zhao, D. Truhlar, Accts. Chem. Res. 41 (2008) 157.
[42] N. Schultz, Y. Zhao, D. Truhlar, J. Comput. Chem. 29 (2008) 185.
[43] Y. Zhao, D. Truhlar, Theor. Chem. Acc. 120 (2008) 215.
[44] B. Ivanova, M. Spiteller, Struct. Chem. 21 (2010) 989.
[45] B. Ivanova, M. Spiteller, Biopolymers 93 (2010) 727.
[46] S. Harsha, D. Grischkowsky, J.Phys.Chem. A 114 (2010) 3489.
[47] P. Hay, W. Wadt, J. Chem. Phys. 82 (1985) 270.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Crystallographic data for the structural analysis have been
deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, CCDC
776415–776417 Copies of this information may be obtained from
the Director, CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EZ, UK (Fax:
+44 1223 336 033; e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk or http://
HOMO and LUMO gaps of the SS5 species at different level of theo-
retical approximation levels (Scheme S1); Solid-state Raman
[48] P. Hay, W. Wadt, J. Chem. Phys. 82 (1985) 299.
[49] M. Dolg, U. Wedig, H. Stoll, H. Preuss, J. Chem. Phys. 86 (1987) 866.
[50] D. Andrae, U. Haussermann, M. Dolg, H. Stoll, H. Preuss, Theor. Chim. Acta 77
(1990) 123.
[52] A. Merschenz-Quack, D. Mootz, Acta Cryst. C46 (1990) 1478.
[53] D. Mootz, J. Fayos Acta Crystallogr. B26 (1970) 2046.
[54] A. Madej, Microchim. Acta 85 (1985) 383.