b-Lapachone stability in solution
Marcílio S. S. Cunha-Filho et al.
1157
On this basis, the objective of this work is to study the dichloromethane–methanol (2 : 2 : 1) followed by preparative
stability properties of bLAP in solution both in the dark and TLC using dichloromethane–methanol (9 : 1) as eluent.
light under accelerated conditions, to determine the pathway/s
The identification of the isolated products was carried out
of degradation of the molecule, identify some degradation by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H
products and establish the kinetics of the processes.
NMR), carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
(13C NMR), electron ionization mass spectrometry (EIMS)
and high-resolution electron ionization mass spectrometry
(HREIMS) analysis and by comparison with the data pub-
Materials and Methods
1
lished in chemical literature. H and 13C NMR spectra were
Materials
recorded in deuterated chloroform (CDCl3) on a Bruker
instrument at 300 and 75 MHz, respectively, with tetrame-
thylsilane (TMS) as the internal reference. High and low-
resolution mass spectra were obtained on a VG Autospec
spectrometer. Macherey-Nagel polygram Sil G/UV254 foils
were used for TLC and SIL G-100UV254 foils for preparative
TLC. Sephadex LH-20 was used for column chromatography.
bLAP (3,4-dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-2H-naphthol[1,2-b]pyran-
5,6-dione; C15H14O3; MW 242.3) was supplied by the Labo-
ratorio Farmacêutico do Estado de Pernambuco/LAFEPE
(Recife, Brazil) with purity estimated by differential scanning
calorimetry (DSC) and high-performance liquid chroma-
tography (HPLC) to be 99.9%. Reference standard of
b-lapachone (083K1337) and lapachol (00509KN) were pur-
chased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinhin, Germany). Methanol
for HPLC was obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).
The solutions were prepared using pure water (Millipore Milli
Q Plus quantification system; Massachusetts, USA). The sol-
vents and reagents used were of high-purity grade.
High-performance liquid chromatography
(HPLC) assay
bLAP assays were performed on a Waters M600 apparatus,
equipped with a C18 cartridge column (125 mm ¥ 45 mm ¥
5 mm) (Waters, Massachusetts, USA) based on a previously
reported method.[15] The mobile phase consisted of methanol–
water 65% (v/v). The isocratic flow rate was 1 ml/min at room
temperature. The injection volume was 20 ml. Chromato-
graphic detection was set at 253 nm with a photodiode array
detector. The bLAP test concentration was 40 mg/ml with a
retention time around 5 min. The mobile phase and samples
were filtered using a 0.45 mm nylon membrane (Waters,
USA). A system suitability test was evaluated by obtaining
the chromatographic parameters; capacity factor, number of
the theoretical plates and tailing factor.[16]
The validation of the analytical method was carried
out according to the ICH Q2.[17] Linearity in the range of
20–60 mm/ml was established (A = 112 967.C – 13 944; cor-
relation coefficient r = 0.9991 with degrees of freedom = 14,
F = 7078.5, a > 0.01). Precision and accuracy were studied,
the values being within the acceptable USP limits. The detec-
tion limit and quantification limit for the bLAP assay were
0.04 and 0.07 mg/ml respectively
Stability of b-lapachone in solution
bLAP aqueous solutions (30 mg/ml) prepared from a stock
ethanolic solution (20 mg/ml) were enclosed in glass
ampoules and stored at 40 Ϯ 2°C under the two conditions of
illumination (darkness and light). Light conditions were
established in accordance with option 2 of the International
Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for
Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH),[14] and
were applied using a modified oven equipped with two white
fluorescent lamps (Hitachi F8T5; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) and
two emission mercury UV lamps (370 nm) (Philips 08F8T5/
BLB; Philips, Eindhoven, Holland). Total brightness (1800
lx) and radiation UV (0.0078 W/m2) were measured by a
luximeter (HD9221; Delta Corps, Padua, Italy) equipped with
a probe (P912151). Both lamps were switched on simulta-
neously. The dark conditions were achieved by wrapping the
ampoules in foil and were included in the same environment.
Throughout one year, the percentage of the remaining
bLAP was determined in triplicate by HPLC at different
preset times. The logarithm of the percentage of the remaining
bLAP against time followed a linear trend making it possible
to calculate pseudo-first-order rate constants for the bLAP
degradation. Prediction of the drug shelf life was calculated
from the kinetics studied as the time that the drug retained
90% potency.
To obtain complete drug decomposition for validation pur-
poses and for purification of the bLAP degradation products,
samples of bLAP solution (30 mg/ml) were placed in an oven
at 50°C in light and darkness conditions until complete decom-
position. The selectivity of the analytical method for bLAP
against its photo and thermal degradation products was tested.
Results and Discussion
Purification and identification of the
degradation products of bLAP
bLAP stability in solution
The solutions of bLAP under degradation in the presence or Saturated aqueous solutions of bLAP present an intense
absence of light showed the formation of several compounds orange colour related to the naphthoquinone structure, which
upon TLC analysis. In the case of degradation under dark progressively became colourless as a consequence of expo-
conditions, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure sure to the light. However, the samples stored in darkness
and the corresponding residue was purified by preparativeTLC became red.
using dichloromethane–methanol (9 : 1) as the eluent. In the
The chromatograms of bLAP solutions before storage and
case of degradation under light conditions, the solvent was after storage in light and darkness are presented in Figure 1.
also removed under reduced pressure and the corresponding bLAP eluted at around 5 min under the HPLC conditions
residue was purified by Sephadex LH-20 column with hexane– selected in this study (Figure 1b). Irradiated bLAP solution