S. Hou et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 5855–5857
5857
Table 1
NAD and its phosphorylated form, NADP, are the dominant re-
dox cofactors for oxidoreductase and dehydrogenase. Natural en-
zymes may prefer one of these two over the other as its cofactor.
There were examples where enzymes were mutated such that
the mutants had substantial cofactor preference changes compared
to the wild-type enzymes.17,18 It remains to be demonstrated that
enzymes can be engineered to take cofactor analogs with similar
efficiency to NAD. Our results also indicated that the NAD binding
pockets of these oxidoreductases were flexible, which may lead to
cofactor promiscuity. It has been proposed that the low levels of
promiscuity are favored in evolution, such that the natural en-
zymes might be turned into a much more proficient catalyst upon
mutagenesis.19,20 The fact that the wild-type ME and ADH could
facilitate their native redox chemistry using these 1,2,3-triazole
moiety containing NAD analogs as cofactors encouraged us to engi-
neer variant enzymes for better activities using directed evolution
strategies.21
Relative enzymatic activity data in the presence of NAD analogs and millimolar
extinction coefficients of the reduced form of NAD analogs
MEa (%)
ADHb (%)
e340 (mMꢀ1 cmꢀ1
)
c
NAD
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
2g
2h
2i
100
0.2
0.7
4.5
2.1
1.3
1.6
3.4
1.8
1.3
0.1
0.3
0.7
0.3
100
0.8
0.7
3.9
2.1
1.3
25.3
8.5
3.2
7.9
0.5
2.8
0.4
0.2
6.29
3.60
6.74
4.47
4.49
5.43
4.13
3.42
5.04
5.32
4.79
4.37
5.33
5.30
2j
2k
2l
2m
a
Assays were performed with 5 mM
L-malate, 5 mM MnCl2, 0.6 mM cofactor and
0.02–2.6 M ME in 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.2) at 25 °C.
l
In summary, we synthesized NAD analogs containing substi-
tuted 1,2,3-triazoles. Noticeable enzymatic activities were ob-
served when these analogs were employed as cofactors for ME or
ADH. Our results may inspire further study to develop novel bio-
logical redox systems or to research other NAD-dependent bio-
chemistry using synthetic cofactors.
b
Assays were performed with 0.5 M ethanol,1 mM cofactor and 6.8–780 nM ADH
(Sigma Cat. No. A3263) in 50 mM sodium pyrophosphate (pH 8.8) at 25 °C.
c
Assays were performed with 5 mM
L-malate, 5 mM MnCl2, 1 mM cofactor and
0.7
lM ME in 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.2) at 25 °C for 30 min. All assays were performed
in triplicate.
presence of ME and each synthetic NAD analog after 30 min. The
mixture was heat-shocked at 75 °C for 10 min to stop the reaction,
and the formation of pyruvate was quantified by IC. Based on the
stoichiometry of the ME-catalyzed reaction, the concentration of
each reduced NAD analog should be equal to the concentration
of pyruvate of the respective reaction. Taken together, we were
able to estimate e340 for the reduced form of all NAD analogs and
confirm the activity of ME in the presence of NAD analogs (Table
1). Except for the reduced form of 2b, other analogs gave lower
e340 values compared with that of NADH. It should be noted that
we determined the e340 value of NADH as 6.29 mMꢀ1 cmꢀ1, very
close to 6.22 mMꢀ1 cmꢀ1 used by most researchers, indicating that
the method had a high accuracy and should be applicable to the
analysis of other redox active NAD analogs. Accordingly, we esti-
mated the relative ME activities using these synthetic cofactors
(Supplementary data). It was clear that ME activities with NAD
analogs were less than 5% of that with NAD as the cofactor. Among
these analogs, 2c assumed the highest ME activity. These data also
indicated that the attachment of an aromatic moiety to the 1,2,3-
triazole ring in these analogs 2b–i was beneficial to act as a cofac-
tor for ME. Our results suggested that the NAD binding pocket of
ME was relatively flexible such that it retained a noticeable activity
using a number of structurally diversified NAD analogs as the
cofactor.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. James, L. C.; Tawfik, D. S. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2003, 28, 361–368.
2. Woenckhaus, C.; Jeck, R. In Coenzymes and Cofactors Pyridine Nucleotide
Coenzyme; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1987; Vol. 2A, pp 450–568.
3. Ansell, R. J.; Small, D. A. P.; Lowe, C. R. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 1999, 6, 111–123.
4. Ansell, R. J.; Small, D. A. P.; Lowe, C. R. J. Mol. Recognit. 1999, 12, 45–56.
5. Ansell, R. J.; Lowe, C. R. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999, 51, 703–710.
6. Hou, S. H.; Liu, W. J.; Ji, D. B.; Zhao, Z. K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 1667–
1669.
7. Wang, J. X.; Tan, H. D.; Zhao, Z. K. Protein Expr. Purif. 2007, 53, 97–103.
8. Liu, R.; Visscher, J. Nucleosides Nucleotides 1994, 13, 1215–1216.
9. Lee, J.; Churchil, H.; Choi, W. B.; Lynch, J. E.; Roberts, F. E.; Volante, R. P.; Reider,
P. J. Chem. Commun. 1999, 729–730.
10. Kennedy, K. J.; Bressi, J. C.; Gelb, M. H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 95–98.
11. Zhang, B.; Wagner, G.; Weber, K.; Garnham, C.; Morgan, A.; Galione, A.; Guse,
A.; Potter, B. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 1623–1636.
12. Dowden, J.; Moreau, C.; Brown, R. S.; Berridge, G.; Galione, A.; Potter, B. V. L.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4637–4640.
13. Mort, C. J. W.; Migaud, M. E.; Galione, A.; Potter, B. V. L. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2004, 12, 475–487.
14. Mukaiyama, T. Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 1976, 1, 371–387.
15. Abramova, T. V.; Vasileva, S. V.; Serpokrylova, I. Y.; Kless, H.; Silnikov, V. N.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 6549–6555.
16. Siegel, J. M.; Montgomery, G. A.; Bock, R. M. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1959, 82,
288–299.
17. Woodyer, R.; van der Donk, W. A.; Zhao, H. M. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 2003, 42,
11604–11614.
With e340 values in hand, we further measured the activity of
ADH using these NAD analogs as cofactors by continuously moni-
toring the absorbance at 340 nm. Noticeable ADH activities were
indeed observed with all analogs (Table 1). More interestingly, rel-
ative ADH activity in the presence of the analogs 2f, 2g, and 2i
reached 25.3%, 8.5%, and 7.9%, respectively, of that in the presence
of NAD. The fact that ADH had up to 25.3% relative activity in the
presence of these synthetic NAD analogs indicated that ADH had
a more flexible NAD binding pocket than ME.
18. Ma, C. W.; Zhang, L.; Dai, J. Y.; Xiu, Z. L. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 146, 173–178.
19. Tracewell, C. A.; Arnold, F. H. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2009, 13, 3–9.
20. Griswold, K. E.; Aiyappan, N. S.; Iverson, B. L.; Georgiou, G. J. Mol. Biol. 2006,
364, 400–410.
21. Turner, N. J. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 9, 567–573.