DNA BINDING STUDIES ON A Cu(II) COMPLEX
1061
caused a gradual decrease in the fluorescence emission inten- the π–π∗ orbital of the bound ligand can couple with the π
sity of the complex with a conspicuous change in the emission orbital of the base pairs, due to decreased π–π∗ transition en-
spectra. It can be seen that a higher excess of DNA led to ergy, which results in bathochromic shift. The prominent shift
more effective quenching of the fluorophore molecule fluores- in the spectra also suggests the tight complexation of synthe-
cence. The quenching of the compound fluorescence clearly in- sized molecule with DNA, which resulted in the change in the
dicated that the binding of the DNA to the[CuL(NO3)2] complex absorption maxima of the DNA. The changes just described are
has changed the microenvironment of the fluorophore residue. indicative of the conformational alteration of DNA on Cu(II)
The reduction in the intrinsic fluorescence of the synthesized complex binding.
molecule upon interaction with DNA could be due to masking
or burial of [CuL(NO3)2] complex fluorophore upon interac-
REFERENCES
tion between the stacked bases within the helix and/or surface
1. (a) Lindoy, L.F. Heavy metal ion chemistry of linked macrocyclic sys-
binding at the reactive nucleophilic sites on the heterocyclic
nitrogenous bases of DNA molecule.
tems incorporating oxygen and/or sulfur in their donor sets. Coord. Chem.
Rev. 1998, 174, 327–342. (b) Lindoy, L.F. The transition metal ion chem-
istry of linked macrocyclic ligands. Adv. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 45, 75–125.
(c) Kaden, T.A. Dinuclear metal complexes of bis-macrocycles. Coord.
Chem. Rev. 1999, 190, 371. (d) Chartres, J.D.; Lindoy, L.F.; Meehan, G.V.
Transition and post-transition metal systems incorporating linked synthetic
macrocycles as structural elements. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 216, 249–
286.
2. Chandra, S.; Gupta, K. Chromium(III), manganese(II), iron(III), cobalt(II),
nickel(II) and copper(II) complexes with a pentadentate, 15-membered
new macrocyclic ligand. Transition Met. Chem., 2002, 27, 196–
199.
3. Bayri, A.; Bahadir, A.R.; Avcu, F.M.; Aytekin, O. Surprising magnetic be-
havior of cobalt(II) ion in recently prepared macrocycle complexes. Distor-
tion versus intermolecular antiferromagnetic exchange interactions. Tran-
sition. Metal Chem. 2005, 30, 987–991.
4. Radecka-Paryzck, W.; Patroniak, V.; Lisowski, J. Metal complexes of
polyaza and polyoxaaza Schiff base macrocycles. Coord. Chem. Rev., 2005,
249, 2156–2175.
5. Keypour, H.; Goudarziafshar, H.; Brisdon, A.K.; Pritchard, R.G.; Reza-
eivala, M. New macrocyclic Schiff-base complexes incorporating a phenan-
throline unit. Part 2: Template synthesis of some manganese(II) com-
plexes and crystal structure studies Inorg. Chim. Acta 2008, 361, 1415–
1420.
6. Adams, H.; Bailey, H.A.; Fenton, D.E.; Hursthouse, M.B.; Kanda, W.;
Kanesato, M.; Malik, K.M.A.; Sadler, E.J. Dinuclear copper-(I) and -(II)
complexes derived from a diprotonated Schiff-base cryptand. J. Chem. Soc.
Dalton Trans. 1997, 921–926.
Absorption Spectroscopy
UV-Vis absorption studies were performed to further ascer-
tain the DNA–[CuL(NO3)2] complex interaction. The UV ab-
sorbance showed an increase with the increase in drug concen-
tration (Figure 4). Since [CuL(NO3)2] complex does not show
any peak in this region (Figure 4), the rise in the DNA ab-
sorbance is indicative of the complex formation between DNA
and [CuL(NO3)2]. The [CuL(NO3)2] complex at 260 nm exhib-
ited hyperchromism of 30% at 1:1 molar ratio. Hypochromism
and hyperchromism are both spectral features of DNA concern-
ing its double-helix structure. Hypochromism means the DNA
binding mode of the complex is electrostatic effect or intercala-
tion, which can stabilize the DNA duplex, and hyperchromism
means the breakage of the secondary structure of DNA.[38,39] So
we primarily speculate that complex is interacting with the sec-
ondary structure with calf thymus DNA, resulting in its breakage
and perturbation. After interaction with the base pairs of DNA,
7. Kruppa, M.; Ko¨nig, B. Reversible coordinative bonds in molecular recog-
nition. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 3520–3560.
8. Wainwright, K.P. Applications for polyaza macrocycles with nitrogen-
attached pendant arms. Adv. Inorg. Chem., 2001, 52, 293–334.
9. Gorden, A.E.V.; Xu, J.; Raymond, K.N.; Durbin, P. Rational design of
sequestering agents for plutonium and other actinides. Chem. Rev. 2003,
103, 4207–4282.
10. Maimon, E.; Zilbermann, I.; Golub, G.; Ellern, A.; Shames, A.I.;
Cohen, H.;Meyerstein, D. Comproportionation and redox catalyzed
isomerization of Cu(II) (1R,4S,8R,11S-1,4,8,11 tetramethyl-1,4,8,11-
tetraazacyclotetradecane)2+ in aqueous solutions, Inorg. Chim. Acta 2001,
324, 65–72.
11. Kimura, E.; Kitamura, H.; Koike, T.; Shiro, M. Facile and selective electro-
static stabilization of uracil N(1)− anion by a proximate protonated amine:
A chemical implication for why uracil N(1) is chosen for glycosylation site.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 10909–10919.
12. Demeunynck, M.; Baily, C.; Wilson, W. D. (Eds.). Small Molecule DNA
and RNA Binders: From Synthesis to Nucleic Acid Complexes; Wiley VCH:
Weinheim, 2002, p. 754.
FIG. 4. Absorption spectra of DNA in the absence and presence of different
concentration of Cu(II) complex. DNA concentration was 0.10 mM (a). Cu(II) 13. Sigman, D.S. Nuclease activity of 1,10-phenanthroline-copper ion. Acc.
complex concentration for DNA-compound system was at 12.5 µM (b), 25 µM
(c), and 50 µM (d), and x represents Cu(II) complex alone (color figure available
online).
Chem. Res. 1986, 19, 180–186.
14. Rodriguez, M.; Liobet, A.; Corbella, M.; Muller, P.; Uson, M.A.; Martell,
A.E.; Reibenspies, J. Solvent controlled nuclearity in Cu(II) complexes