Table 1. Identifying Catalyst for the Reactiona
Scheme 1. Proposed Lewis Base Catalyzed Allylic Trifluo-
methylation of MBH Carbonates
entry
catalyst
DABCO
solvent
yieldc (%)
1
DMF
DME
DME
DME
DMF
DME
DME
0
85
0
2
DABCO
3
none
4
PPh3
0
5
PPh3
(η3-C3H5PdCl)2
Pd þ i-Pr PhOX
0
regenerate the hard nucleophilic CF3 anion in situ.
During the preparation of this manuscript, Shibata
and co-workers reported the first allylic trifluoro-
methylation of MBH adducts in high yields.8 The four
enantioselective examples they described require long
reaction time and elevated temperature (ca. 5 days,
60 °C) and excess of Ruppert reagent (5 equiv). The
desired products were isolated with modest yield.
Herein, we describe an improved reaction condition
for the cinchona alkaloid catalyzed asymmetric allylic
trifluoromethylation of MBH carbonates using
Ruppert reagent. This method allows the reaction to
proceed under room temperature with much improved
yield.
Initially, with the Ruppert reagent as the trifluoro-
methyl source, we examined the reaction using 4-nitro-
MBH carbonate (1a) as the prototypical substrate and
DABCO or Ph3P as the Lewis base to test our specu-
lated transformation in different solvents (Table 1). To
our delight, we found that DABCO smoothly cata-
lyzed the allylic trifluorometylation in DME with very
good chemoselectivity and yield. In contrast, no de-
sired product was found when using Ph3P as catalyst or
DMF as solvent. Notably, when palladium-catalyzed
allylic alkylation conditions were employed9 (entries 6
and 7, Table 1), no desired product was found in the
reaction mixture. Encouraged by this preliminary re-
sult, we envisaged that an appropriate chiral tertiary
amine might be able to transfer its chirality to the
newly generated allylic carbon bearing a CF3 group
based on the mechanism depicted in Scheme 1. A
literature survey led us to cinchona and its derivatives,
6
7b
0
0
a Unless otherwise noted, reactions were performed with 0.1 mmol of
1a, 0.25 mmol of TMSCF3, 0.01 mmol of KF, and 0.01 mmol of catalyst
in 0.5 mL of solvent. b (η3-C3H5PdCl)2, 0.005 mmol, and (R)-(ꢀ)-
2-[2-(diphenylphosphino)phenyl]-4-isopropyl-2-oxazoline (i-Pr PhOX),
0.01 mmol, were used. c Isolated yield.
especially (DHQD)2PHAL, which was first reported
by Sharpless et al. in asymmetric dihydroxylation
reactions.10 This chiral tertiary amine base is usually
treated as an enantiomeric equivalent of DABCO and has
been applied in various asymmetric organic trans-
formations.11 We found that under the same condition as
that for DABCO, (DHQD)2PHAL was a less efficient
catalyst. The reaction hardly proceeded to full conversion
in DME even after 120 h of stirring at room temperature.
However, to our delight, high enantiomeric excess was
observed in the trial reactions. Elevating the reaction tem-
perature to 50 °C showed slight acceleration of reaction
rate, but the ee dropped from 94% to 79% (entries 1 and 2,
Table 2). When this reaction was performed under higher
concentration (0.5 M), the reaction could proceed to full
conversion with good yield and excellent ee value (95%)
at room temperature. Reaction rate could be further
accelerated with the substrate concentration reaching
1 M; however, the ee value started to drop to 89%. Con-
sidering charge could build up for the key reaction
intermediates, we decided to further investigate solvent
effects for this transformation.
Solvent screening did show that acetonitrile has signifi-
cant acceleration effect on this transformation. The reac-
tion could proceed to full conversion within 8 h;
however, the ee value was less satisfying (entry 7,
Table 2). It is also interesting to note that in this solvent
system, when the reaction was performed under lower
concentration and catalyst loading, we were still able to
drive the reaction to completion within 24 h with some
(7) (a) Cho, C.-W.; Krische, M. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43,
6689. (b) Cui, H.-L.; Feng, X.; Peng, J.; Lei, J.; Jiang, K.; Chen, Y.-C.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5737. (c) Feng, X.; Yuan, Y.-Q.; Cui,
H.-L.; Jiang, K.; Chen, Y.-C. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 3660. (d)
Hong, L.; Sun, W.; Liu, C.; Zhao, D.; Wang, R. Chem. Commun. 2010,
46, 2856. (e) Jiang, Y.-Q.; Shi, Y.-L.; Shi, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 7202. (f) Sun, W.; Hong, L.; Liu, C.; Wang, R. Org. Lett. 2010, 12,
3914. (g) van Steenis, D. J. V. C.; Marcelli, T.; Lutz, M.; Spek, A. L.; van
Maarseveen, J. H.; Hiemstra, H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 281.
(h) Zhang, S.-J.; Cui, H.-L.; Jiang, K.; Li, R.; Ding, Z.-Y.; Chen, Y.-C.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 5804.
(8) Furukawa, T.; Nishimine, T.; Tokunaga, E.; Hasegawa, K.;
Shiro, M.; Shibata, N. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3972.
(9) Helmchen, G.; Pfaltz, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 336.
(10) Sharpless, K. B.; Amberg, W.; Bennani, Y. L.; Crispino, G. A.;
Hartung, J.; Jeong, K. S.; Kwong, H. L.; Morikawa, K.; Wang, Z. M.
J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 2768.
(11) (a) Whitehead, D. C.; Yousefi, R.; Jaganathan, A.; Borhan, B.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 3298. (b) Tian, S.-K.; Hong, R.; Deng, L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9900. (c) Poisson, T.; Gembus, V.; Dalla,
V.; Oudeyer, S.; Levacher, V. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 7704. (d) Ogawa,
S.; Shibata, N.; Inagaki, J.; Nakamura, S.; Toru, T.; Shiro, M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8666. (e) Kobbelgaard, S.; Brandes, S.;
Jorgensen, K. A. Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14, 1464. (f) Bui, T.; Borregan,
M.; Barbas, C. F. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 8935. (g) Bella, M.; Jorgensen,
K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5672.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 22, 2011
6083