ORGANIC
LETTERS
2011
Vol. 13, No. 23
6216–6219
Catalytic Hydroacylation as an Approach
to Homoaldol Products
Stephen K. Murphy, David A. Petrone, Matthew M. Coulter, and Vy M. Dong*
Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, 80 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario
M5S 3H6, Canada
Received October 3, 2011
ABSTRACT
A method has been developed for the intermolecular hydroacylation of homoallyl alcohols with salicylaldehydes to furnish homoaldol products in
50À98% yields. The method also applies to the hydroacylation of 2-hydroxystyrenes. This work highlights the use of hydroacylation as a unified
approach to both aldol and homoaldol products.
While significant progress has been made in aldol technol-
ogy, these advances do not generally apply to the related
homoaldol transformation. In contrast to enolates, homo-
enolates are difficult to prepare and readily undergo irrever-
sible cyclization to oxyanionic cyclopropanes rather than
desirable nucleophilic addition to electrophiles.1 Given the
importance of these “umpolung” or “reverse polarity” motifs
in CÀC bond construction,2 much work has been devoted to
generating homoenolate equivalents.1,3 Nonetheless, no gen-
eral catalytic strategy exists for targeting both the aldol
structure and its homologue. Our laboratory is interested in
studying hydroacylation as an atom economical and efficient
strategy for organic synthesis.4,5 In this context, we envi-
sioned that hydroxyl-directed hydroacylation could provide
a unified strategy for preparing both aldol and homoaldol
products as shown in Scheme 1.
By using cooperative catalysis, we recently achieved the
branched-selective hydroacylation6 of allyl alcohols to
form aldol products.7 This transformation is promoted
by a phosphinite catalyst that binds the alcohol and metal
catalyst simultaneously to promote the olefin functionali-
zation. With this strategy, Bedford developed a method for
ortho-arylation of phenols, and Breit and Tan more re-
cently achieved branched-selective hydroformylation of
(1) Kuwajima, I.; Nakamura, E. Top. Curr. Chem. 1990, 155, 1.
(2) Seebach, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1979, 18, 239.
(6) For hydroacylation of simple olefins using a double chelation
approach, see: (a) Coulter, M. M.; Kou, K. G. M.; Galligan, B.; Dong,
V. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 16330. (b) Imai, M.; Tanaka, M.;
Tanaka, K.; Yamamoto, Y.; Imai-Ogata, N.; Shimowatari, M.; Nagumo,
S.; Kawahara, N.; Suemune, H. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 1144.
(7) Murphy, S. K.; Coulter, M. M.; Dong, V. M. Chem. Sci. (DOI:
10.1039/c1sc00634g).
(8) For ortho-arylation of phenols using phosphinites, see: (a) Bedford,
R. B.; Coles, S. J.; Hursthouse, M. B.; Limmert, M. E. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 112. (b) Bedford, R. B.; Limmert, M. E. J. Org. Chem.
2003, 68, 8669. For branched-selective hydroformylation of alkenyl
alcohols using phosphorus-based ligands that reversibly bind the alco-
(3) For reviews on the homoaldol reaction, see: (a) Hoppe, D.
Synthesis 2009, 1, 43. (b) Crimmins, M. T.; Nantermet, P. G. Org. Prep.
Proc. 1993, 25, 43. (c) Kuwajima, I.; Nakamura, E. In Comprehensive
Organic Synthesis, Vol. 2; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergammon:
Oxford, 1991; p 441. For a comprehensive full paper on the homoaldol
reaction, see: (d) Lettan, R. B., II; Galliford, C. V.; Woodward, C. C.;
Scheidt, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8805.
(4) Trost, B. M. Science 1991, 254, 1471.
(5) For reviews on hydroacylation, see: (a) Willis, M. C. Chem. Rev.
2010, 110, 725. (b) Fu, G. C. In Modern Rhodium-Catalyzed Reactions;
Evans, P. A., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 2005; p 79. For selected
examples of activated or strained olefins in Rh-catalyzed intermolecular
olefin hydroacylation, see: (c) Osborne, J. D.; Willis, M. C. Chem.
Commun. 2008, 5025. (d) Tanaka, K.; Shibata, Y.; Suda, T.; Hagiwara,
Y.; Hirano, M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1215. (e) Osborne, J. D.; Randell-Sly,
H. E.; Currie, G. S.; Cowley, A. R.; Willis, M. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 17232. (f) Kokubu, K.; Matsumasa, K.; Nishinaka, Y.; Miura, M.;
Nomura, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1999, 72, 303. (g) Stemmler, R. T.;
Bolm, C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 1185. (h) Phan, D. H. T.; Kou,
K. G. M.; Dong, V. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 16354.
€
hol, see: (c) Grunanger, C. U.; Breit, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 120,
€
7456. (d) Grunanger, C. U.; Breit, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49,
967. (e) Usui, I.; Nomura, K.; Breit, B. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 612. (f) Ueki,
Y.; Ito, H.; Usui, I.; Breit, B. Chem.;Eur. J. 2011, 17, 8555. For a recent
review, see: (g) Rousseau, G.; Breit, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50,
2450. (h) Lightburn, T. E.; Dombrowski, M. T.; Tan, K. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 9210. (i) Lightburn, T. E.; De Paolis, O. A.; Cheng, K. H.;
Tan, K. L. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 2686. (j) Worthy, A. D.; Joe, C. L.;
Lightburn, T. E.; Tan, K. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 14757. For a
recent review, see: (k) Tan, K. L. ACS Catal. 2011, 1, 877.
r
10.1021/ol202663p
Published on Web 11/07/2011
2011 American Chemical Society