excellent catalytic reactivity towards the ethylene polymerization
(6.06 ꢀ 105 g PE mol Niꢁ1 hꢁ1 barꢁ1; Table 1, also see Fig. S5 in
the ESI†) combined with MAO as a cocatalyst. More interest-
ingly, the yielded polyethylene (PE) exhibits spherical structures
with diameters in the range of 3.1–24.3 mm (7.4 mm in mean size,
Fig. 7c), which is significantly larger than BNDCs (430 nm in
average diameter). The PE beads exhibit solid structures formed
by an agglomerate of large numbers of uniform PE microspheres
with around 200 nm of average diameter (Fig. 7d). This fact is
responsible for the rough surface of polyethylene spheres.
Interestingly, it is visualized that there exists a round ‘‘trap’’ on
the surfaces of some PE beads, exactly replicating the structures
of some hollow BNDCs (Fig. 6a).
the growing PE microspheres would occupy the interior space of
BNDCs, yielding the final solid PE beads. Additionally, the
hollow structures of BNDCs are more favorable for the
substance diffusion, giving slightly higher catalytic activity of
hollow BNDCs than that of solid BNDCs. Note that the resul-
tant PE beads possess textural pores derived from the inter-
particle spacing, which not only lower the density of PE mate-
rials, but also provide promising applications in the field of
substance transportation. In addition, it could be feasible to
generate PE beads with desired surface morphologies by using
BNDCs with designed topologies. To the best of our knowledge,
this is the first report concerning the achievement of PE beads
with porous textures and possibly tunable surface
morphologies.32
In addition, the solid BNDCs exhibit solid and spherical
structures (Fig. 7e), which are similar to the original DC hosts
(Fig. 2a). These BNDCs also showed good catalytic activity for
ethylene polymerization assisted with MAO (1.22 ꢀ 105 g PE mol
Niꢁ1 hꢁ1 barꢁ1, Table 1, also see Fig. S5 in the ESI†). The yielded
PE beads show solid structures with mean sizes ranging from 2.4
to 17.8 mm (7.0 mm in average, Fig. 7f). Each PE bead consists of
numerous uniform PE microspheres with 190 nm in average
diameter. Interestingly, in comparison with the PE beads
obtained by hollow BNDCs, no round ‘‘trap’’ is observed on the
surfaces of yielded PE beads. This suggests that the produced PE
beads replicate the surface morphologies of original solid
BNDCs.
Conclusions
A facile route to fabricate DC self-assemblies with tunable
morphologies ranging from solid spheres, nanotubes and
capsules via p–p stacking and hydrogen bond interactions has
been demonstrated. The DC assemblies are excellent multifunc-
tional hosts for in situ generation and encapsulation of Au
nanoparticles, yielding novel solid and hollow DC/Au hybrid
nanospheres by one-pot or two-step fabrication process. Solid
and hollow DC assemblies were also used to host Ni(II) ions to
generate DC/Ni(II) hybrid particles, resulting in bulky and highly
active catalysts for ethylene polymerizations to produce porous
PE beads consisting of numerous PE microspheres. Moreover,
the PE beads replicate the surface morphologies of original bulky
catalysts. The formation mechanism of the PE beads is eluci-
dated as an analogous ‘‘multigrain model’’. Note that these DC
assemblies can be used to host various metal species to fabricate
a variety of DC/metal NPs (Ag, Pt, Pd, etc.) hybrid nano-
materials and polymer (PE, polypropylene, etc.) beads with
porous textures.
The formation of these fascinating PE structures can be
explained by an analogous ‘‘multigrain model’’ mechanism.31
Each building block, the Ni(II) a-diimine complex, in BNDCs
acts as an active site. Since BNDCs possess textural pores formed
in the self-assembly processes of DC molecules, ethylene mono-
mers and co-catalysts are allowed to diffuse to the active sites and
in situ polymerize, producing a large number of grain-sized
polymer spheres. Accompanied with the successive feeding of
monomers, polymerizations continuously occur on the living
chains surrounded on the surfaces of as-formed grain-sized
polymer spheres. These newly formed polymer chains push the
previous formed polymer layer, thus leading to the growth of the
grain-sized polymer spheres into microspheres and consequently
the formation of the final PE beads. Since each building block
serves as a separated active site to catalyze the production of a PE
microsphere, the uniform in situ growth of these PE microspheres
is responsible for the yield of final PE beads with replicating
topology of original BNDCs. If hollow interiors in BNDCs exist,
This work was supported by the World Class University
Program (no. R32-2008-000-10174-0), the National Core
Research Center Program from MEST (no. R15-2006-022-01001-
0), and the Brain Korea 21 program (BK-21).
Notes and references
€
1 A. Walther, J. Yuan, V. Abetz and A. H. E. Muller, Nano Lett., 2009,
9, 2026.
2 M. Schmittel and V. Kalsani, Top. Curr. Chem., 2005, 245, 1.
3 M. D. Pluth and K. N. Raymond, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2007, 36, 161.
4 C. M. Drain, A. Varotto and I. Radivojevic, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109,
1630.
Table 1 Selected ethylene polymerization resultsa
5 I. Imaz, J. Hernando, D. Ruiz-Molina and D. Maspoch, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 2325.
6 A. Ajayaghosh and V. K. Praveen, Acc. Chem. Res., 2007, 40,
644.
Catalysts
(BNDC)
Rp,avg
104
ꢀ
Mv
104
ꢀ
Mn
103
ꢀ
Branchesf/
1000 C
b
c
d
e
Tm /
PDId ꢂC
7 M. D. Pluth, R. G. Bergman and K. N. Raymond, Acc. Chem. Res.,
2009, 42, 1650.
8 S. M. Biros, R. G. Bergman and K. N. Raymond, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2007, 129, 12094.
9 Y. Sun and Y. Xia, Science, 2002, 298, 2176.
10 P. Raveendran, J. Fu and S. L. Wallen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125,
13940.
11 H. Li, J. K. Jo, L. Zhang, C.-S. Ha, H. Suh and I. Kim, Langmuir,
2010, 26, 18442.
Hollow DC sphere 60.6
Solid DC spheres 12.2
10
12
43
48
3.8
4.4
125 37
127 30
a
Conditions: toluene ¼ 80 mL, PC2H4 ¼ 1.3 bar, catalyst ¼ 2.5 mmol, time
¼ 30 min, temperature ¼ 50 ꢂC, and MAO/Ni ¼ 250. b Average rate of
c
polymerization as
g
PE mol Niꢁ1 hꢁ1 barꢁ1
.
Viscosity-average
molecular weight characterized with viscometry at 135 ꢂC in decalin
(Ubbelohde viscometer). Number-average molecular weight (Mn) and
d
e
polydispersity index (PDI) determined by GPC. Melting point
f
determined by DSC. Branches per 1000 carbon atoms determined by
12 G. G. Hlatky, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 1347.
13 B. K. Bahuleyan, G. W. Son, D. W. Park, C. S. Ha and I. Kim, J.
Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 2008, 46, 1066.
1H NMR.
17944 | J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 17938–17945
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011