Full Paper
0.60 for ligand e) than a Ph ring (ꢀFL =0.10 for ligand f) or H
atom (ꢀFL =0.06 for ligand d). The different substituents at the
_
o-carboranyl units in the D–A-structured HCN ligands do not
change the excited states, but can suppress the rotation of the
CÀC bond, which leads to enhanced solid state emission.[14]
Photophysical properties of iridium(III) complexes
UV/Vis absorption and photoluminescence (PL) measurements
on the two series of iridium(III) complexes were performed in
degassed acetonitrile at room temperature (5.0ꢁ10À5 m, lex =
365 nm for PL). The absorption spectra of complexes I, II, and
III are quite similar, and exhibit a bathochromic shift of about
10 nm compared with model complex 1 (Figure 3). Incorpora-
tion of o-carborane at the pyridine ring results in a narrowed
bandgap between HOMO and LUMO levels compared with
that in complex 1, which is in accordance with the calculated
spectra (Supporting Information, Figure S3). The UV spectrum
of complex 2 shows strong absorption around 380 nm, which
is quite different from those of complexes I–III and 1. This is
ascribed to the charge transfer occurring in complex 2. Similar
absorptions were also observed in the UV spectra of IV and V,
which show bathochromic shifts of 18 and 26 nm, respectively
(Table 1). Thus the o-carboranyl unit has enhanced the elec-
tron-accepting ability of the acceptor in the D–A-structured iri-
dium(III) complexes, similar to previously reported com-
plexes.[15]
Figure 3. Absorption spectra of complexes I, II, III, IV, and V and model com-
plexes 1 and 2 in degassed CH3CN (5.0ꢁ10À5 m) at room temperature.
the control complex 1, complex IV exhibits a blueshift of
15 nm, which indicates that the D–A ligand structure can in-
crease the energy gap of iridium(III) complexes. Comparison of
1 with V reveals an 8 nm blueshift in emission, from 530 to
522 nm. Thus, both calculated and experimental results have
demonstrated that incorporating a carboranyl unit on the pyri-
_
dine ring of CN ligands can tune the energy gap between
HOMO and LUMO. In the cases of complexes with D–A struc-
tures, the energy gaps can be increased to a slightly greater
extent than those without D–A structures. Complex III is com-
pletely quenched in CH3CN solution. In general, the quantum
yields (FP) are low for all the newly synthesized iridium(III)
complexes (Table 1).
As for the emission properties, the HOMO and LUMO levels
of complex IV are lowered compared with those of 2. This indi-
cates that the introduction of carborane to the pyridine ring
can lower both the HOMO and LUMO energy levels and has
more impact on the former than on the later. The net increase
in the HOMO–LUMO bandgap of 0.05 eV is responsible for the
blueshift from 526 to 515 nm (Table 1). For complex V, the
HOMO level is decreased by 0.10 eV and the LUMO level is de-
creased by 0.08 eV compared with complex 2. This leads to an
overall increase in the bandgap of 0.02 eV, which is responsible
for a blueshift of 4 nm (from 526 to 522 nm; Figure 4 and
Table 1). The energy gaps increased by 0.04–0.05 eV, from
2.34 eV (in complex 1) to 2.38 eV (in complex I) and 2.39 eV (in
complex II), corresponding to blueshifts of 8 and 12 nm com-
pared with control compound 1. For complexes I and IV, the
energy gaps between HOMO and LUMO are 2.38 and 2.41 eV,
which result in blueshifts from 522 to 515 nm. Compared with
To explore the nature of the emission, quantum chemical
calculations were carried out on all the iridium(III) complexes
(Figure 5). TD-DFT calculations revealed that the HOMOs are
largely located on the iridium(III) centers and pyridine rings of
the cyclometalated ligands, whereas the LUMOs are located on
_
the whole CN ligands and partially on the carborane units. Evi-
dently, the o-carboranyl units are involved in excited states,
and the CÀC bonds of carboranes directly participate in the
LUMOs. The variable CÀC bond of carborane can dissipate
energy, which might be responsible for the observed emission
quenching (Table 1).[16]
Table 1. Photophysical and electrochemical data of iridium(III) complexes.
[a]
[a]
[b]
ox
onset
[c]
labs [nm] (lge)
lem [nm]
t [ns][b]
FPL
E
[eV]
Eg [eV]
HOMO/LUMO [eV][b]
V
IV
2
1
I
261 (4.7), 382 (4.6), 420 (4.7), 481 (4.2)
262 (4.3), 350 (4.1), 412 (4.2), 493 (4.3)
296 (4.6), 376 (4.6), 394 (4.5), 458 (3.5)
260 (4.5), 339 (4.0), 398 (3.9), 463 (3.6)
275 (4.7), 350 (4.1), 396 (3.9) 480 (3.5)
275 (4.7), 356 (4.0), 398 (3.8), 484 (3.7)
276 (4.6), 358 (3.9), 423 (3.7), 496 (3.6)
522.0
515.0
526.0
529.5
522.0
518.0
0
159.4
339.7
339.9
817.8
112.1
157.1
26.4
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.11
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.639
0.628
0.539
0.43
0.649
0.681
0.645
2.375
2.408
2.357
2.342
2.375
2.394
0
À5.44/À3.06
À5.43/À3.02
À5.34/À2.98
À5.23/À2.89
À5.45/À3.07
À5.48/À3.09
À5.45/À3.05
II
III
[a] In CH3CN. [b] Data in degassed solvents at 298 K. [c] HOMO [eV]=Àe(Eoonxset +4.8), Eg =1240/l, LUMO [eV]=Eg +HOMO.
&
&
Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 1 – 10
4
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ÝÝ These are not the final page numbers!