1558
M. Iqbal Choudhary et al. / Steroids 76 (2011) 1554–1559
Table 6
ture was stirred for three hrs, and then neutralized by adding 2 M
HCl. The precipitates were filtered, washed with acidic water
(10 mL ꢀ 2), and neutral water (20 mL), and dried in vacuum.
Cytotoxicity of (O-carboxymethyl) oximes derivatives 101–106.
S. no.
R
IC50 (lM)
HepG2
MDA-MB-231
8.2. General procedure for pyrazoline derivatives 18–76
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
4-Methylphenyl
2-Chlorophenyl
3,4-Difluorophenyl
3,4-Dichlorophenyl
2-Pyridinyl
>40.00
>40.00
24.52
>40.00
>40.00
16.44
>40.00
28.97
0.63
>40.00
>40.00
34.52
>40.00
>40.00
26.92
>40.00
>40.00
1.23
One drop of hydrochloric acid (11.0 mol) was added to the solu-
tion of each benzylidene derivatives 2–17, each 100 mg) in ethanol
(6 mL). Phenyl hydrazine (1.5 eq molar) was added to the resulting
solution, and refluxed overnight at 90 °C. After completion of reac-
tion, the solvent was evaporated under vacuo, and purified by SiO2
gel column chromatography.
2,4-Dichlorophenyl
–
Pregnenolone (1)
Doxorubicin
8.3. General procedure for oxime derivatives 92–99
Each benzylidene derivative (100 mg) in pyridine (2.2 mL) was
combined with hydroxylamine hydrochloride (2.5 eq) and stirred
for 22 h. Reaction mixture was poured into a solution containing
pre-cooled 10% aq. HCl (10 mL). The product was extracted with
dichloromethane (3 ꢀ 15 mL). The organic extracts were com-
bined, and washed with saturated aqueous NaCl (3 ꢀ 10 mL), dried
over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, and the solvent was removed
in vacuo. Oximes 92–99 were purified by thin layer
chromatography.
Table 7
The purity level of the cytotoxic compounds.
Compound no.
% Purity
8
17
48
98
91.8
87.7
89.3
98.0
olone (1), the heterocyclic enone 8, and its pyrazoline derivative 48
were found to be the most active compounds. All (O-carboxy-
methyl) oxime, hydazones and pyrazole derivatives of pregneno-
lone did not show any significant activity against both cell lines.
8.4. (O-Carboxymethyl) oxime derivatives of enones 100–106
The benzylidene derivative (250 mg) in pyridine (100 mL) was
combined with amino oxy-acetic acid hemihydrochloride
(280 mg), and stirred at 23 °C. After 24 h, the reaction mixture was
poured into a solution containing 10% aq HCl (30 mL), and precoold
in ice. The product was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 ꢀ 50 mL). The
organic extract was washed with saturated solution of NaCl
(3 ꢀ 30 mL), dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in
vacuo.
8. General experimental method
Parallel synthesizer (Smart Start Synthesizer with 16 reaction
vessels) was purchased from Chemspeed Ltd., Switzerland. Re-
agents were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd.,
Japan. Pregnenolone (1) was supplied by Acros Organics, New
Jersey, USA, and CD3OD were purchased from the E. Merck
(Germany). The other organic solvents were obtained from Fisher
Scientific Limited, UK, and were used as received. Absolute ethanol
was obtained by distillation of ethanol over anhydrous calcium
oxide. Flash chromatography was performed on E. Merck (60
230–400 mesh silica gel). Thin layer chromatography was per-
formed on 0.25 mm silica gel plates (E. Merck, 60F254). Visualiza-
tion of the TLC plates was achieved under the UV light at 254
and 366 nm and by spraying with ceric sulfate reagent. The solvent
system n-hexane-ethyl acetate (3:2) was used as eluent. The IR
spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu FTIR-8900 spectrophotome-
Crystal data of 107: C23H36NO4, Mr = 390.53, monoclinic, space
group P21, a = 6.5950(11) Å, b = 11.3801(18) Å, c = 29.257(4) Å,
V = 2182.9(6) Å3, Z = 4,
q
calc = 1.185 mg/m3, F(000) = 848,
l
(Mo
Ka) = 0.71073 Å, max/min transmission 0.9960/0.9641 crystal
dimensions 0.46 ꢀ 0.23 ꢀ 0.05, 0.70 < h < 25.5, 12,988 reflections
were collected, of which 4240 reflections were judged
(Rint = 0.0477). The R values were: R1 = 0.0505, wR2 = 0.1165 for
I > 2r(I), and R1 = 0.0910, wR2 = 0.1476 for all data; max/min resid-
ual electron density: 0.223/ꢁ0.136 eÅꢁ3. Crystallographic data for
compound 107 has been deposited in the Cambridge Crystallo-
graphic Data Center. These information can directly be obtained free
of charge from CCDC data center (CCDC 836728 reference code).
ter. Melting point was taken on BUCHI 535. [a] was recorded on
D
Hitachi U-3200 spectrophotometer. EI- and HREI-MS were re-
corded on JMS HX 110 and on JMS-DA 500 mass spectrometers.
The 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker NMR spec-
trometers, operating at 300, 400, and 500 (75, 100, and 125 for
13C). The chemical shifts values are reported in ppm (d) units,
and the coupling constants (J) are given in Hz. Single-crystal X-
ray diffraction data was collected on Bruker Smart APEX II, CCD
4-K area detector diffractometer [17]. Data reductions was per-
formed by using SAINT program. The structure was solved by di-
rect method [18], and refined by full-matrix least squares on F2
by using the SHELXTL-PC package [19]. The figures were plotted
with the aid of ORTEP program [20].
8.5. Cytotoxicity assay
Human breast (MDA-MB-231), and liver (HepG2) cancer cell
lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection
(ATCC), USA. Cell viability was measured by the MTT [3-(4,5-
dimethylthiazole-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazoliumbromide] colorimet-
ric method. After drug treatment, the attached cells were incubated
for 4 h with MTT (0.5 mg/mL, 1 h). The medium was removed, and
DMSO was added to dissolve the formazan crystals. The absor-
bance at 550 nm was then measured by using an ELISA microplate
reader.
Acknowledgment
8.1. General procedure for benzylidene derivatives 2–17
We are grateful to the Higher Education Commission, Pakistan,
for the research project entitled, ‘‘Development of New Antiviral
and Anticancer Steroids by Combinatorial Synthesis and High-
The ethanol (25 mL) and NaOH (4 M, 3 mL) were mixed, cooled in
an ice bath, and then compound 1 (0.3 mmol, 100 mg) was added.
The aromatic aldehyde (0.6 mmol) was added dropwise. The mix-
throughput Biological Screening-
a New Approach to Drug