Table 1 The optical and electrochemical properties of BNB and TBNBT and the photovoltaic characteristics of BHJ solar cell devices at 1 : 4 (w/w)
small molecule/PC71BM compositions blended in chlorobenzene
Small molecule
lmaxa/nm
lmaxb/nm
Eogptc (filmb)
HOMOd/eV
LUMOe/eV
Jsc/mA cmꢀ2
Voc/V
FF
PCE (%)
BNB
TBNBT
426
499
494
533
2.16
1.96
ꢀ5.16
ꢀ5.34
ꢀ3.18
ꢀ3.34
3.79
6.18
0.93
0.95
0.28
0.37
0.98
2.20
a
b
c
d
ox
Measured in chlorobenzene solution. Spin-coated film from chlorobenzene solution. Eogpt = 1240/lonset
.
HOMO = ꢀ(4.4 + E
) (eV).
onset
e
red
onset
LUMO = ꢀ(4.4 + E
).
for both the BNB : PC71BM and TBNBT : PC71BM films.
However, the TBNBT : PC71BM blend film (rms = 0.245 nm)
showed better miscibility with low PCBM grain aggregation
compared with the BNB : PC71BM blend film (rms = 0.41 nm),
which could explain the relatively higher FF of the
TBNBT : PC71BM cell.12
In conclusion, a new p-conjugated rigidly fused, symmetrical,
and planar building block naphtho[1,2-b:5,6-b0]dithiophene
(NDT) was employed for the first time to develop novel
conjugated small molecules for OSCs. As an outcome of our
sequential structural design, solution-processed BHJ OSCs
based on one of the small molecules, TBNBT, reached a PCE
of 2.20% with a noticeably high Voc of 0.95 V under preliminary
device characterizations. This work shows for the first time
that a naphtho[1,2-b:5,6-b0]dithiophene moiety bridged with a
thiophene as a conjugated spacer is a quite promising, simple,
and useful building block for designing efficient photoactive
materials.
Fig. 3 (a) J–V curves of BHJ solar cell devices based on the
BNB : PC71BM (red line) and TBNBT : PC71BM (blue line) at a
1 : 4 w/w ratio in CB under an illumination of AM 1.5G, 100 mW cmꢀ2
.
(b) EQE and absorption spectra of the corresponding devices.
(1 : 1 to 1 : 4 w/w) with active layer thicknesses ranging from
55 to 75 nm. Optimal fabrication conditions were achieved with
a small molecule/PC71BM ratio of 1 : 4 (w/w) at a 65 nm active
layer thickness. Fig. 3(a) shows the current density–voltage
(J–V) curves of the OSCs in the dark and under illumination
of AM 1.5G (100 mW cmꢀ2). The corresponding photovoltaic
properties of the devices are summarized in Table 1. The device
with a 1 : 4 weight ratio of BNB to PC71BM provided a Voc of
0.93 V, a Jsc of 3.79 mA cmꢀ2, and a fill factor (FF) of 0.28,
resulting in an estimated PCE of 0.98%. In contrast, the device
based on TBNBT and PC71BM with the same weight ratio
delivered a superior performance with a Voc of 0.95 V, a Jsc of
6.18 mA cmꢀ2, and an FF of 0.37, yielding a PCE of 2.20%.
The higher Voc values are consistent with the deep lying HOMO
values of both BNB and TBNBT. However, the slightly larger
band gap and smaller absorption coefficient of BNB translated
into a lower Jsc in the BNB/PC71BM solar cell devices.
This work was supported by the New & Renewable Energy
program of KETEP (No. 20103020010050) funded by MKE
and Pioneer Research Center Program through NRF funded
by MEST (No. 2008-05103), Korea.
Notes and references
1 H.-Y. Chen, J. Hou, S. Zhang, Y. Liang, G. Yang, Y. Yang, L. Yu,
Y. Wu and G. Li, Nat. Photonics, 2009, 3, 649.
2 J. Y. Kim, K. Lee, N. E. Coates, D. Moses, T.-Q. Nguyen,
M. Dante and A. J. Heeger, Science, 2007, 317, 222.
3 B. Walker, A. B. Tomayo, X. D. Dang, P. Zalar, J. H. Seo,
A. Garcia, M. Tantiwiwat and T. Q. Nguyen, Adv. Funct. Mater.,
2009, 19, 3063–3069.
External quantum efficiencies (EQE) of the devices (1 : 4 w/w)
measured under the illumination of monochromatic light are
presented in Fig. 3(b) together with their composite film absorp-
tions. Both BHJ devices exhibited significant photon-to-current
responses in the range of 300–700 nm, similar to their absorp-
tion spectra in the composite films. The BNB : PC71BM device
exhibited a maximum EQE of 40% at 360 nm. In comparison,
the TBNBT : PC71BM-based device showed even better spec-
tral response with its maximum EQE being approximately
50% at 370 nm. The broad and relatively high coverage of
EQE for the TBNBT : PC71BM devices also contributed to a
considerable increase in the Jsc value.
4 S. Roquet, A. Cravino, P. Leriche, O. Aleveque, P. Frere and
J. J. Roncali, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 3459–3466.
5 N. M. Kronenberg, M. Deppisch, F. Wurthner, H. W. A.
¨
Lademann, K. Deing and K. Meerholz, Chem. Commun., 2008,
6489.
6 (a) S. Shinamura, E. Miyazaki and K. Takimiya, J. Org. Chem.,
2010, 75, 1228; (b) I. Osaka, T. Abe, S. Shinamura, E. Miyazaki
and K. Takimiya, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 5000.
7 J. Hou, H.-Y. Chen, S. Zhang, G. Li and Y. Yang, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2008, 130, 16144.
8 Z. Li, Q. Dong, Y. Li, B. Xu, M. Deng, J. Pei, J. Zhang, F. Chen,
S. Wen, Y. Gao and W. Tian, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 2159.
9 Z. Li, J. Ding, N. Song, J. Lu and Y. Tao, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010,
132, 13160.
10 M. M. Wienk, J. M. Kroon, W. J. H. Verhees, J. Knol, J. C.
Hummelen, P. A. Van Hal and R. A. J. Janssen, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 3371.
11 H. Choi, S. Paek, J. Song, C. Kim, N. Cho and J. Ko, Chem.
Commun., 2011, 47, 5509.
The film morphologies of the active layers were observed by
atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements. The surface
topography of BNB : PC71BM and TBNBT : PC71BM blend
films at a 1 : 4 w/w blend ratio is shown in Fig. S7 (ESIw).
Smooth surfaces lacking large phase separation were observed
12 J. Zhang, W. Cai, F. Huang, E. Wang, C. Zhong, S. Liu, M. Wang,
C. Duan, T. Yang and Y. Cou, Macromolecules, 2011, 44, 894.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 573–575 575