428
J.N. Abrams et al. / Tetrahedron 68 (2012) 423e428
higher doses and is rapidly converted by phosphatases in the plasma to eto-
24. For spectral data of the silane compound, see Supporting Information, p 10. For
an original reference, see: (a) Brook, A. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1974, 7, 77e84; (b) For
a review relating to [1,4] and [1,5] Brook and retro-Brook rearrangements, see
Lautens, M.; Delanghe, P. H. M.; Goh, J. B.; Zhang, C. H. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60,
4213e4227.
25. Below are representative examples of entry to podophyllotoxin and related
compounds. For routes involving intramolecular cycloaddition/DielseAlder
reactions of substituted o-quinodimethanes, see: (a) Jung, M. E.; Yuk-Sun Lam,
P.; Mansuri, M. M.; Speltz, L. M. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 1087e1105; (b) Mac-
donald, D. I.; Durst, T. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 4749e4750; (c) Kraus, G. A.; Wu, Y.
J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 2922e2925. For other DielseAlder approaches, see: (d)
Bush, E. J.; Jones, D. W. C. S. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993, 1200e1201. For
tandem-conjugate addition routes, see: (e) Wu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Chen, J.; Pan, C.; Li,
L.; Zhang, H. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 597e600; (f) Hadimani, S. B.; Tanpure, R. P.;
Bhat, S. V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 4791e4794; (g) Harrowven, D. C. Tetra-
hedron 1993, 49, 9039e9048; (h) Stadler, D.; Bach, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
poside. For another analog with twice the water solubility of etoposide, see
Yoshida, M.; Kobunai, T.; Aoyagi, K.; Saito, H.; Utsugi, T.; Wierzba, K.; Yamada, Y.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2000, 6, 4396e4401.
10. Kobayashi, K.; Ratain, M. J. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 1994, 34, S64eS68.
11. Alam, M. A.; Gulati, P.; Gulati, A. K.; Mishra, G. P.; Naik, P. K. Indian J. Biotechnol.
2009, 8, 391e399.
12. Wender, P. A.;Verma, V.A.;Paxton, T. J.;Pillow, T. H.Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 40e49.
13. Ji, J.; Zhang, C.; Lu, X. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 1160e1169.
14. NOESY and gHMBC NMR analyses were performed on all a-methylene g-bu-
tyrolactones. See Supplementary data, Chemical Shift Assignments, Com-
pounds E-5, E-10, Z-5, Z-10, pp 12e13.
15. Li, Y.; Jardine, K. J.; Tan, R.; Song, D.; Dong, V. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48,
9690e9692.
16. (a) Miyaura, N.; Yamada, K.; Suzuki, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 20, 3437e3440;
(b) Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2457e2483. For recent studies,
see: (c) Littke, A. F.; Dai, C.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4020e4028; (d)
Barder, T. E.; Walker, S. D.; Martinelli, J. R.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 4685e4696.
2008, 47, 7557e7559;
ˇ (i) For a palladium-catalyzed approach, see Charruault,
L.; Michelet, V.; Genet, J.-P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 4757e4760; (j) For an
aryl radical cyclization approach, see Ishibashi, H.; Ito, K.; Hirano, T.; Tabuchi,
M.; Ikeda, M. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 4173e4182.
17. Sonogashira, K.; Tohda, Y.; Hagihara, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 16, 4467e4470.
18. Initially, substrate 17 was treated with 2.1 equiv of n-butyllithium, followed by
26. For example, see Ref. 25b.
1
equiv of allyl chloroformate, yet produced exclusively the undesired
27. Many syntheses employ at least 13 steps or more from commercially available
starting materials: see citations in Ref. 25. For a review of synthetic approaches
to the Podophyllum lignans, see: (a) Ward, R. S. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1999, 16, 75e96;
(b) Ward, R. S. Phytochem. Rev. 2003, 2, 391e400.
28. The majority of studies cited in Ref. 25. install the E-ring at an early stage.
29. For brief reviews of E-ring modifications to podophyllotoxin, see: (a) Ref. 2b.
For studies validating the functional importance of the E-ring of etoposide, see:
(b) Wilstermann, A. M.; Bender, R. P.; Godfrey, M.; Choi, S.; Anklin, C.; Berko-
witz, D. B.; Osheroff, N.; Graves, D. E. Biochemistry 2007, 46, 8217e8225.
30. The major byproduct from transformation of 16 into 15 has been isolated.
Extensive spectral analysis has lead to its tentative assignment as a tetralone
cyclopropane. See Supplementary data, pp 15e16.
carbonate.
19. Ethyl chloroformate was also employed to form the corresponding ethyl enyne
alkynoate. However, the subsequent saponification appeared to proceed more
smoothly with the analogous allyl enyne alkynoate.
20. Ganolix Lifescience recently prepared substrate 16 for our group using this
route. These materials are allocated for future analog development with the
Louisiana Cancer Research Consortium (LCRC) Molecular Biology Core. See
Supplementary data, p 4.
21. These structural elucidations were performed through a combination of HMBC
and NOESY NMR techniques. See Supplementary data, Chemical Shift Assign-
ments Compounds 15, pp 11e12.
22. Walter, J.; Gensler, W. J.; Murthy, C. D.; Trammell, M. H. J. Med. Chem. 1977, 20,
31. Trost, B. M. Science 1991, 254, 1471e1477.
635e644.
32. For example, spectral evidence for the conversion of the D-ring lactone moiety
of substrate 15 into a lactam derivative has been found. See Supplementary
data, p 16.
23. Houpis, I. N.; Shilds, D.; Nettekoven, U.; Schnyder, A.; Bappert, E.; Weerts, K.;
Canters, M.; Vermuelen, W. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2009, 13, 598e606.