Int J Pept Res Ther (2012) 18:89–98
95
Table 1 Physical and analytical data of the conjugated compounds (16–25)
Entry Rf
Yield M.P. °C Theoretical Actual MS
1H NMR data (CDCl3, d ppm)
value (%)
Mol. Wt.
values (M?)
16
17
0.83 88.0
0.81 90.0
Gummy 478
478.4
Boc = 1.41 (9H, s); Phe = 3.20–3.51 (2H, d, –bCH2), 4.94 (1H, t, -aCH),
6.89–7.23 (5H, m, ArH), 8.10 (1H, s, –NH); Heterocycle = 3.51–3.74 (8H,
m, –CH2), 6.89–7.23 (3H, m, ArH)
Boc = 1.43 (9H, s); Trp = 3.14–3.34 (2H, d, –bCH2), 4.95 (1H, t, –aCH),
7.08 (1H, s, –CH of indole), 6.64–7.39 (4H, m, ArH), 10.21 (1H, s, -NH of
indole), 8.08 (1H, s, –NH); Heterocycle = 3.54–3.71 (8H, m, –CH2),
6.64–7.39 (3H, m, ArH)
Boc = 1.43 (9H, s); Tyr(2,6-Cl2-Bzl) = 3.21-3.54 (2H, d, –bCH2), 4.93 (1H,
t, –aCH), 5.27 (2H, s, –CH2 of side chain protecting group), 6.72–7.49 (7H,
m, ArH), 8.12 (1H, s, –NH); Heterocycle = 3.47–3.74 (8H, m, –CH2),
6.72–7.49 (3H, m, ArH)
Boc = 1.40 (9H, s); Gly1 = 3.87 (2H, s, –aCH); Gly2 = 4.14 (2H, s, –aCH);
Ala3 = 1.30 (3H, d, –bCH3), 4.62 (1H, m, –aCH); Pro4 = 1.97–2.10 (2H, m,
–cCH2), 2.11–2.18 (2H, m, –bCH2), 3.64, 3.79 (2H, m, –dCH2), 4.60 (1H, m,
–aCH); Heterocycle = 3.47–3.74 (8H, m, –CH2), 6.72–7.49 (3H, m, ArH)
Boc = 1.42 (9H, s); Gly1 = 3.81 (2H, s, –aCH); Gly2 = 3.97 (2H, s, –aCH);
Ile3 = 1.04–1.06 (6H, d, –(CH3)2), 1.43 (2H, m, –cCH2), 2.11 (1H, m,
–bCH), 4.60 (1H, m, –aCH); Pro4 = 2.12–3.65 (6H, m, –CH2), 4.57 (1H, m,
–aCH); Heterocycle = 3.66–3.74 (8H, m, –CH2), 6.90–7.26 (3H, m, ArH)
Boc = 1.44 (9H, s); Gly1 = 3.83 (2H, s, –aCH); Gly2 = 3.93 (2H, s, –aCH);
Phe3 = 3.18, 3.57 (2H, d, –bCH2), 4.93 (1H, t, –aCH); 6.99–7.26 (5H, m,
ArH); Pro4 = 1.99–2.00 (2H, m, –cCH2), 2.05, 2.23 (2H, m, –bCH2),
3.57–3.62 (2H, m, –dCH2), 4.95 (1H, m, –aCH); Heterocycle = 2.23–2.94
(8H, m, –CH2), 6.99–7.26 (3H, m, ArH)
129
517
653
614
656
690
517.4
653.4
613.5
655.6
18
19
20
21
0.84 96.0
0.72 90.0
0.72 90.0
0.64 91.0
79
84–86
78–81
60–62
711.2
[M??Na]
22
23
24
0.62 94.0
0.66 89.0
0.73 88.0
116–118 741
104–106 837
167–170 3136
740.7
Boc = 1.41 (9H, s); Gly1 = 3.82 (2H, s, –aCH); Val2 = 0.96 (6H, m,
(–CH3)2), 2.58 (1H, m, –bCH), 4.50 (1H, m, –aCH); Gly3 = 4.13 (2H, s,
–aCH); Val4 = 0.96 (6H, m, (–CH3)2), 2.63 (1H, m, –bCH), 4.49 (1H, m,
–aCH); Pro5 = 2.11–3.64 (6H, m, –CH2), 4.52 (1H, m, –aCH);
Heterocycle = 2.23–2.94 (8H, m, –CH2), 6.99–7.26 (3H, m, ArH)
Boc = 1.42 (9H, s); Gly1 = 3.82 (2H, s, –aCH); Phe2 = 3.52, 3.58 (2H, m,
–bCH2), 4.64 (1H, m, –aCH), 6.91–7.28 (5H, m, ArH); Gly3 = 4.12 (2H, s,
–aCH); Phe4 = 3.47, 3.60 (2H, m, –bCH2), 4.66 (1H, m, –aCH), 6.91–7.28
(5H, m, ArH); Pro5 = 2.11–3.64 (6H, m, –CH2), 4.51 (1H, m, –aCH);
Heterocycle = 3.40–3.73 (8H, m, –CH2), 6.91–7.28 (3H, m, ArH)
858.3
[M??Na]
3142.2
Boc = 1.67 (9H, s); Gly = 4.09, 4.92 (24H, m, –aCH); Val = 0.98, 1.01
(36H, m, (–CH3)2), 2.45, 2.65 (6H, m, –bCH), 4.41 (6H, m, –aCH);
Glu = 1.15–1.25 (10H, m, –CH2 of cyclohexyl ring), 2.07, 2.19 (4H, m,
–
b,cCH2), 3.71 (1H, m, –CH of cyclohexyl ring), 4.74 (1H, m, –aCH);
Phe = 3.52, 3.72 (10H, m, –bCH2), 4.21, 4.67 (5H, m, –aCH), 7.19–7.62
(25H, m, ArH); Pro = 2.02, 3.55, 3.69 (36H, m, –CH2), 4.75 (6H, m, a–CH);
Heterocycle = 3.40, 3.64 (8H, m, –CH2), 7.19–7.62 (3H, m, ArH)
25
0.74 89.0
185–188 3136
3142.2
Boc = 1.62 (9H, s); Gly = 4.08, 4.90 (24H, m, –aCH); Val = 0.98, 1.00
(36H, m, (–CH3)2), 2.44, 2.62 (6H, m, –bCH), 4.41 (6H, m, –aCH);
Glu = 1.09–1.25 (10H, m, –CH2 of cyclohexyl ring), 2.07, 2.17 (4H, m,
–
b,cCH2), 3.68 (1H, m, –CH of cyclohexyl ring), 4.70 (1H, m, –aCH);
Phe = 3.52, 3.70 (10H, m, –bCH2), 4.21, 4.59 (5H, m, –aCH), 7.20–7.62
(25H, m, ArH); Pro = 2.02, 3.55, 3.69 (36H, m, –CH2), 4.75 (6H, m, a–CH);
Heterocycle = 3.41, 3.64 (8H, m, –CH2), 7.20–7.62 (3H, m, ArH)
derivative with elastin based peptides. Encouraged by this,
in the present study it was felt worthy to link piperazine
moiety to these peptides. It is evident from the results that
all the heterocycle conjugated amino acids/peptides have
exhibited enhanced activity compared to heterocycle or
free peptides tested alone which are inactive or weakly
active ([50 lg/ml).
Earlier studies report the significance of activity
revealed by aromaticity and hydrophobicity (Shivakumara
et al. 2007; Suresha et al. 2009, 2011; Suhas et al. 2011)
and hence initially more hydrophobic and aromatic amino
acids such as Phe, Trp and Tyr were selected for conju-
gation. The results revealed that the Phe coupled hetero-
cycle (26) has shown improved activity. Surprisingly, other
123