Angewandte
Chemie
Table 1: Optimization of the reaction conditions.
in a 3:2:1 (v/v/v) ratio provided the best yield (79%) with high
monoallylation selectivity (2a/4a = 91:9; entry 16); these
reaction conditions were finally selected as the best set of
reaction conditions.[18] The reaction using only 0.5 mol% of
catalyst also proceeded smoothly, though the yield of 2a was
slightly lower (entry 17).
With the optimized conditions in hand, we examined the
scope of the allylic alcohols 1, and the results are summarized
in Table 2.[18] Direct amination of a series of cinnamyl alcohol
derivatives (1b–f) with aqueous ammonia afforded the
corresponding primary monoallylamines 2b–f with high
yield and high selectivity (entries 1–5). Notably, the branched
allylic alcohol 1g was efficiently converted into primary
allylamine 2a with the same 2/4 distribution (entry 6) as
observed for the reaction of 1a (entry 16, Table 1).[18] Other
branched allylic alcohols (1h–j) also gave comparable results
(entries 7–9). Sterically congested 1,3-disubstituted allylic
alcohols 1k–p were good substrates for the present catalysis.
(E)-1,3-Diphenylprop-2-en-1-ol (1k) was readily converted
into 1,3-diphenylallylamine (2k) in excellent yield, and,
notably, the corresponding bisallylated product 4k was not
detected by 1H NMR or CI-MS analysis of the crude reaction
mixture (entry 10). The excellent high monoallylation selec-
tivity observed for 1k originated from the selective attack of
the smaller nucleophile ammonia on the 1,3-diphenyl p-
allylplatinum intermediate, where the large bite angle of the
diphosphine ligand DPEphos produced a congested environ-
ment around the Pt center, compared with the corresponding
monoallylated amine 2k. Similarly, the amination of (E)-3-(4-
methoxyphenyl)-1-phenylprop-2-en-1-ol (1l) and (E)-1-(4-
methoxyphenyl)-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-ol (1m) produced
identical monoallylated amines 2l as a regioisomeric mixture
with the same ratio (53:47; entries 11 and 12).
Entry[a] Solvent
aq. NH3/solvent 2a
2a/4a[b]
(equiv of NH3)[16] Yield [%][b]
1
1,4-dioxane
1:5 (20)
1:2 (40)
1:1 (60)
2:1 (80)
1:1 (60)
1:1 (60)
1:1 (60)
1:1 (60)
1:1 (60)
1:1 (60)
1:1 (60)
1:1 (60)
1:1 (60)
1:1 (60)
– (120)
60
71
74
51
82:18
89:11
90:10
94:6
–
94:6
97:3
91:9
92:8
–
96:4
94:6
80:20
93:7
93:7
91:9
92:8
2
3
4
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxane
THF
5[c]
6[e]
7[e]
8
n.d.[d]
34
29
52
59
9
DME
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17[h]
toluene
CH3CN
DMSO
DMF
MeOH
n.d.[d]
27
30
4
71
–
7[f]
1,4-dioxane/MeOH 3:2:1 (60)
1,4-dioxane/MeOH 3:2:1 (60)
79 (72)[g]
69
[a] Reaction conditions: 1a (0.5 mmol), [Pt(cod)Cl2] (1 mol%), DPEphos
(2 mol%), 28% aq. NH3[16] and solvent (total volume 6.0 mL), 1008C in
sealed tube. [b] Determined by 1H NMR spectrum of the crude reaction
mixture. [c] Reaction temperature was 808C. [d] Not detected. [e] Xant-
phos was used instead of DPEphos. Pt/L=1:2 (entry 6) and 1:1
(entry 7). [f] 1a was recovered in 92% yield. [g] Yield of isolated product
after Boc protection.[18] [h] 0.5 mol% of catalyst was used. DME=ethy-
leneglycol dimethyl ether, DMF=N,N’-dimethylformamide, DMSO=
dimethylsulfoxide, THF=tetrahydrofuran.
Direct catalytic amination of alkyl-substituted allylic
alcohol remains a challenging task because of its low
reactivity and the potential risk of b-hydride elimination. In
our previous platinum catalysis using alkyl- and arylamines as
a nucleophile, such undesired side reactions were prevented
by changing the solvent from 1,4-dioxane to DMF and
lowering the reaction temperature to 508C. As shown in
Table 1, however, the present platinum-catalyzed amination
with ammonia could not employ either DMF or low temper-
ature conditions. Fortunately, under the optimized reaction
conditions shown in Table 2, reactions of (E)-4-phenylbut-3-
en-2-ol (1n) and (E)-1-phenylbut-2-en-1-ol (1o) resulted in
the good conversion into the same monoallylated amine 2n
with the same high 2/4 selectivity (> 99:1; entries 13 and
14).[17] The reaction of (E)-4-(4-methoxyphenyl)but-3-en-2-ol
(1p) with ammonia also proceeded efficiently to give the
corresponding monoallylated amine 2p in 70% yield without
the formation of the bisallylated amine 4p. Although the
cyclic allylic alcohols 1q (entry 16) and the b-substituted 1r
(entry 17) were less reactive substrates, good yields were
obtained when using 3 mol% of the catalyst.
yield because of the partial deactivation of the platinum
catalyst at a higher concentration of ammonia (entry 4). At a
lower reaction temperature (808C), no reaction occurred
(entry 5). Under the same reaction conditions as those used
for entry 3, the Pt/Xantphos catalyst systems (Pt/L = 1:2 and
1:1) were less efficient and gave 2a in poor yield (entries 6 and
7). We then examined the solvent effects relative to a 1:1 (v/v)
ratio of aqueous ammonia and solvents. In THFand DME, 2a
was obtained in moderate yields; 52% and 59%, respectively
(entries 8 and 9). In toluene, no reaction proceeded because
of the biphasic reaction mixture (entry 10). Coordinative
solvents such as acetonitrile and DMSO afforded the
products in lower yields (entries 11 and 12). In DMF, N,N-
dimethyl-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-amine was formed as the
major product through transamidation of DMF with ammo-
nia, and a trace amount of the desired primary allylamine was
detected in the crude reaction mixture (entry 13).[15b] In protic
methanol media, the results were similar (entry 14) to those
obtained in 1,4-dioxane. Other alcohols were less effective
than MeOH in terms of the yield of 2a.[17] The reaction in
aqueous ammonia without organic solvent resulted in a very
low yield of 2a along with recovered starting material (92%;
entry 15). It is intriguing that the Pt/DPEphos in the mixed
solvent system of aqueous ammonia, 1,4-dioxane, and MeOH
Furthermore, highly unstable thiophene- and furan-sub-
stituted allylic alcohols 1s and 1t, respectively (entries 18 and
19), were also successfully converted into the corresponding
primary amines without decomposition. Overall, this plati-
num catalytic system provides a new protocol for the direct
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 150 –154
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
151