R. E. Martin, F. Morawitz, C. Kuratli, A. M. Alker, A. I. Alanine
SHORT COMMUNICATION
[3]
a) A. Polyzos, M. O’Brien, T. P. Petersen, I. R. Baxendale, S. V.
Ley, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 1190–1193; b) M.
O’Brien, I. R. Baxendale, S. V. Ley, Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1596–
1598; c) B. Gutmann, J.-P. Roduit, D. Roberge, C. O. Kappe,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 7101–7105; d) J. C. Brandt,
S. C. Elmore, R. I. Robinson, T. Wirth, Synlett 2010, 20, 3099–
3103; e) A. A. Kulkami, V. S. Kalyani, R. A. Joshi, R. R. Joshi,
Org. Process Res. Dev. 2009, 13, 999–1002.
rent process window and to conduct underrepresented reac-
tions more efficiently. It limits the risks and hazards associ-
ated with the use of traditional high-temperature and high-
pressure batch equipment and enables the re-exploration of
“neglected” reactions usually avoided due to lack of suit-
able processing tools.
[4]
[5]
A. E. Frissen, A. T. M. Marcelis, G. Geurtsen, D. A. de Brie,
H. C. van der Plas, Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 5151–5162.
a) J. A. Joule, K. Mills, Heterocyclic Chemistry, 4th ed.,
Blackwell Science, Oxford, 2000, pp. 63–120; b) K. Kral, M.
Hapke, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2434–2435; c) M. D.
Hill, Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 12052–12062.
a) A. E. Frissen, A. T. M. Marcelis, H. C. van der Plas, Tetrahe-
dron 1989, 45, 803–812; b) W. A. W. Stolle, A. T. M. Marcelis,
A. Koetsier, H. C. van der Plas, Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 6511–
6520; c) D. M. Vandenberghe, G. J. Hoornaert, Bull. Soc. Chim.
Belg. 1994, 103, 185–186; d) T. Koike, Y. Hoashi, T. Takai, O.
Uchikawa, Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 3009–3011; e) D. L.
Boger, S. M. Weinreb, “Hetero Diels–Alder Methodology in
Organic Synthesis” in Organic Chemistry (Ed.: H. H. Wasser-
man), Academic Press, New York, 1987.
W. A. W. Stolle, A. E. Frissen, A. T. M. Marcelis, H. C.
van der Plas, Y. Wang, L. Häming, C. H. Stam, J. Org. Chem.
1991, 56, 2411–2416.
K. A. Brameld, B. Kuhn, D. C. Reuter, M. Stahl, J. Chem. Inf.
Model. 2008, 48, 1–24.
The Vapourtec R2+/R4 flow system is commercially available
a) I. Mamajanov, J. Herzfeld, J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 130, 134503/
1–134503/6; b) I. Mamajanov, J. Herzfeld, J. Chem. Phys. 2009,
130, 134504/1–134504/5; c) C. N. Matthews, R. D. Minard,
Faraday Discuss. 2006, 133, 393–401; d) C. N. Matthews, Cell.
Origin Life Extreme Habitats Astrobiol. 2004, 6, 121–135.
CCDC-826667 contains the supplementary crystallographic
data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge
from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via
www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
Experimental Section
Experimental Setup: Knauer K-501 HPLC solvent pump, HP 6890
Series Gas Chromatography (GC) oven equipped with a 53-mL
homemade reactor coil by using Supelco 304 stainless steel tubing
(length ϫ ID = 15.2 m ϫ2.1 mm), an Omnifit glass chromatog-
raphy column [filled with a short silica plug (ca. 1 cm, silica 60 Å)
and glass wool to provide a large surface for absorption of oligo-
meric and polymeric material] and a 750 psi back-pressure regula-
tor.
[6]
General Flow Procedure for the Synthesis of Annulated Pyridines
2a–w: A 0.1 m solution (25 mL) of pyrimidines 1a–w in toluene
containing 1% (v/v) of pentan-3-one was pumped at a flow rate of
1290 μLmin–1 (effective residence time tR,eff = 30 min) through the
reactor coil (volume = 53 mL) heated to 310 °C. The reactant
stream was collected in water containing 1 m NaOH (except for 2c
and 2u) and gaseous cyanide side products were pushed by a gentile
stream of nitrogen into two traps filled with a 1:1 mixture of 10%
NaOH and sodium hypochlorite (13% active chlorine). The solu-
tion was extracted with ethyl acetate (3ϫ), and the organic solvent
was dried with anhydrous MgSO4 and evaporated under reduced
pressure. The crude material was purified by medium-pressure li-
quid chromatography (MPLC) over silica. The fume hood air space
was monitored during the entire experiment by a HCN detector.
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
cle): Determination of the thermal volume expansion of toluene,
pictures of the cross- and longitudinal section cuts of the reactor
coil and the experimental setup used for meso-scale production,
detailed experimental procedures, and compound characterization
data.
[12]
[13]
A. E. Frissen, A. T. M. Marcelis, H. C. van der Plas, Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 1987, 28, 1589–1592.
Supelco premium grade 304 stainless steel tubing; dimensions:
length ϫ OD (ID) = 15.2 m ϫ3.2 mm (2.1 mm); product refer-
ence number: 2–0526-U.
[14]
[15]
Commercially available Omnifit glass chromatography column
with adjustable height-end piece (plunger) of 6.6 mm
bore and 100 mm length (max 900 psi). Website: http://
www.omnifit.com.
J. S. Yadav, D. V. K. Sharma, Thermochim. Acta 2009, 496,
166–172. The thermal expansion coefficient α for toluene is
given as 1.085ϫ103 (K–1). Based on a temperature difference
between room temperature (23 °C) and reaction temperature
(310 °C) of 289 K a volume expansion of 31% is calculated.
However, it should be noted that the thermal expansion coeffi-
cient α is only valid within a certain temperature range, as the
volume expansion as a function of temperature is not strictly
linear.
The thermal volume expansion of toluene was determined by
measuring the excess amount of solvent that leaves the reactor
during heatup between room temperature and the reaction
temperature as well as by an independent flow marker method.
Both methods revealed with 37 and 38% volume expansion,
respectively, similar values. For more detailed information, see
the Supporting Information.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Mrs. Diana Monteiro for the preparation of the
starting materials, Mr. Daniel Zimmerli for technical assistance, Dr.
Thomas Wellauer (DSM Nutritional Products AG, 4334 Sisseln,
Switzerland) for corrosion analysis, and Dr. Thomas Woltering and
Dr. Luke Green for helpful discussions.
[1] a) T. Illg, P. Löb, V. Hessel, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 3707–
3719; b) V. Hessel, Chem. Eng. Technol. 2009, 32, 1655–1681;
c) C. Wiles, P. Watts, Future Med. Chem. 2009, 1, 1593–1612;
d) F. Paviou, Pharm. Technol. Eur. 2009, 21, 22–32; e) B. P.
Mason, K. E. Price, J. L. Steinbacher, A. R. Bogdan, D. T.
McQuade, Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2300–2318.
[2] a) C. Wiles, P. Watts, Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 6512–6535; b)
P. Watts, C. Wiles (Eds.), Micro Reaction Technology in Organic
Synthesis, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2011; c) T. Wirth (Ed.),
Microreactors in Organic Synthesis and Catalysis, Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, 2008; d) S. Ceylan, A. Kirschning, “Organic Syn-
thesis in Mini Flow Reactors Using Immobilized Catalysts” in
Recoverable and Recyclable Catalysts (Ed.: M. Benaglia), John
Wiley & Sons, New York, 2009, pp. 379–410; e) V. Hessel, C.
Knobloch, H. Löwe, Recent Pat. Chem. Eng. 2008, 1, 1–16.
[16]
[17]
U. Tilstam, T. Defrance, T. Girard, Org. Process Res. Dev. 2009,
13, 321–323.
Received: October 20, 2011
Published Online: November 24, 2011
52
www.eurjoc.org
© 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 47–52