yields.13 Under these conditions, the desired N-hydroxyl-
amines 6a,b were obtained, but proved to be relatively
unstable in air. Fortunately, a direct, single-pot reduction
of the reaction product using Zn/AcOH14 afforded the
lactams 7a,b in 51% yield and in a 90/10 cis/trans15 ratio
(Table 1, entry 1), accompanied by the β-silylpropanoate
8,16 arising from reduction of 5 (35%).
Scheme 1. Attempted Cross-Coupling of Nitrone 1 and Acrylate 2
Table 1. SmI2-Mediated Cross-Coupling of Nitrone 4 and Ac-
rylate 5
moderate in the case of intermolecular reactions. Probably
due to electronic effects, β-alkoxy-estersare poor acceptors
for nitrone conjugate addition reactions. In contrast, the
SmI2-mediated cross-coupling of nitrones with alkyl
β-substituted R,β-unsaturated esters, such as methyl cro-
tonate, afforded the expected coupling product in good
yields and with excellent stereoselectivities.2a,c Carbon and
silicon, being in the same column of the periodic table,
present similar electronic properties.7 We thus thought
that the SmI2-mediated cross-coupling of nitrones with
β-silyl-substituted R,β-unsaturated esters could be more
successful than with the alkoxy esters. The silyl group
would then serve as a masked hydroxyl group, to be later
revealed by TamaoꢀFleming oxidation.8 β-Silyl acrylates
or acrylamides have already been used in conjugate addi-
tion reactions9 but, to the best of our knowledge, never
in a SmI2-mediated cross-coupling reaction.10 Here, we
report the SmI2-mediated cross-coupling of nitrones with
a β-silyl acrylate and its application to the synthesis of
(þ)-australine.
SmI2
additives
(equiv)
temp
time
(h)
7a,b
cis/
entry (equiv)
(°C)
(yield %) transa
1
2
3
3
4
4
H2O
(8)
ꢀ78
28
51
53
84
90/10
90/10
>98/2
H2O
(8)
ꢀ78 to
ꢀ30
0.1
H2O/LiBr ꢀ78 to
0.1
(8/12)
ꢀ30
a Ratio determined by 1H analysis of the crude reaction mixture.
In a preliminary assay, nitrone 411 and ethyl (E)-
3-(dimethylphenylsilyl)propenoate (5)12 in the presence
of water (8 equiv) at ꢀ78 °C were treated with SmI2.
Through coordination to SmI2, water forms a more reac-
tive species, often allowing faster reactions and better
Next, the same reagents were mixed at ꢀ78 °C and the
cooling bathwas removed at the end of SmI2 addition. At a
temperature of ꢀ30 °C (reached after 5 min), the starting
nitrone was completely consumed. However, after zinc
reduction of the intermediate N-hydroxylamines 6a,b,
lactams 7a,b (90/10 cis/trans ratio) were isolated in a
similar 53% yield (Table 1, entry 2). The introduction into
the reaction mixture of LiBr17 proved to be more reward-
ing. Indeed, with a combination of SmI2 and H2O/LiBr
additives, only the cis lactam 7a was formed and in an
improved yield of 84% (Table 1, entry 3). Flowers has
demonstrated that the addition of 12 equiv of LiBr to
solutions of SmI2 in THF provides a system with an
oxidation potential of ꢀ1.98 V as compared with ꢀ1.33
V for SmI2 alone vs the Ag/AgNO3 reference electrode.18
The increase in the reducing ability of the system may well
account for the improvement in the reaction efficiency.
Furthermore, introduction of the lithium cation seems to
favor the formation of the cis lactam.
(5) Kerrigan, N. J.; Upadhyay, T.; Procter, D. J. Tetrahedron Lett.
2004, 45, 9087.
ꢀ
(6) Donadel, O. J.; Martın, T.; Martın, V. S.; Padron, J. M. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 18.
(7) As a consequence, silicon has been considered as an isostere of
carbon in drug discovery: (a) Showell, G. A.; Mills, J. S. Drug Discovery
Today 2003, 8, 551. (b) Bains, W.; Tacke, R. Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery
Dev. 2003, 6, 526. (c) Gately, S.; West, R. Drug Dev. Res. 2007, 68, 156.
(8) (a) Tamao, K.; Ishida, N.; Tanaka, T.; Kumada, M. Organome-
tallics 1983, 2, 1694. (b) Fleming, I.; Henning, R.; Plaut, H. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984, 29.
(9) (a) Klumpp, G. W.; Mierop, A. J. C.; Vrielink, J. J.; Brugman, A.;
Schakel, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 6740. (b) Fleming, I.;
Lawrence, N. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 2679. (c) Clayden,
J.; Watson, D. W.; Helliwell, M.; Chambers, M. Chem. Commun. 2003,
2582. (d) Stork, G.; Tang, P. C.; Casey, M.; Goodman, B.; Toyota, M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16255. (e) Shintani, R.; Okamoto, K.;
Hayashi, T. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4757. (f) Lipshutz, B. H.; Tanaka, N.;
Taft, B. R.; Lee, C.-T. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1963. (g) Balskus, E. P.;
Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6810.
(14) See Supporting Information.
(15) Relative configuration was determined by NOESY experiments.
See Supporting Information.
(16) (a) Sommer, L. H.; Marans, N. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1950, 72,
1935. (b) Nakashima, T.; Fujiyama, R.; Fujio, M.; Tsuno, Y. Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1999, 72, 741.
(10) For the SmI2-mediated hydrodimerization of silyl acrylates, see:
(a) Fleming, I.; Ghosh, S. K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1992, 1775.
(b) Fleming, I.; Ghosh, S. K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 2711.
(11) Dondoni, A.; Franco, S.; Junquera, F.; Merchan, F.; Merino, P.;
Tejero, T. Synth. Commun. 1994, 24, 2537.
(12) (a) Takeshita, K.; Seki, Y.; Kawamoto, K.; Murai, S.; Sonoda,
N. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 4864. (b) Sieburth, S. M.; Lang, J. J. Org.
Chem. 1999, 64, 1780.
(17) Peltier, H. M.; McMahon, J. P.; Patterson, A. W.; Ellman, J. A.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16018.
(13) Szostak, M.; Spain, M.; Parmar, D.; Procter, D. J. Chem.
Commun. 2012, 8, 330.
(18) Fuchs, J. R.; Mitchell, M. L.; Shabangi, M.; Flowers, R. A., II.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 8157.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 4, 2012
1043