72
P. W. Davies, S. J.-C. Albrecht
CLUSTER
lylic to methyl, presumably allowing greater rotational
freedom around the ylidic S–C bond.
O
O
R1
SBn
O
O
R1
The difference in reactivity between 1a and 1f, with the
latter more likely to afford the product of [2,3]-sigmatro-
pic rearrangement, may result from the smaller furan unit
aiding the sigmatropic pathway on steric grounds. How-
ever, the effect of the conjugated carbonyl unit on reduc-
ing the localised anionic character at C-3 could well
decrease the relative rate of the allyl cation migration onto
this position.
2b
Ph
SBn
Ph
AuCl (5 mol%)
ClCH2CH2Cl
70 °C
1a (R1 = Me)
1g (R1 = t-Bu)
3ab 85%
3gb 66% (+16% 1g)
SMe
2d
AuCl (5 mol%)
ClCH2CH2Cl
70 °C
In summary, a heteroaromatic unit can be incorporated
into the gold-catalysed intermolecular coupling reaction
between a propargylic carboxylate and an allyl sulfide.
Sulfur ylides can even be installed by this method in the
presence of an enolizable carbonyl group. The [2,3] rear-
rangement of sulfur ylides prepared directly from propar-
gylic carboxylates is observed for the first time, and the
outcome of this reaction is highly dependent upon the
choice of the nonmigrating sulfur substituent. The struc-
turally isomeric products are formed by divergent path-
ways from the sulfur ylide and a complete switch in
reaction outcome was observed when using S-phenyl and
S-methyl allyl sulfide.
O
O
O
t-Bu
O
t-Bu
Ph
SMe
Ph
SMe
3gd
:
6gd
1
1.9
74%
Scheme 4 Coupling of methyl and benzyl allyl sulfides
of these conditions. To rule out an active catalyst for the
Cope rearrangement only being formed during a coupling
reaction, (E/Z)-6gd was also added to a reaction between
1a and 2e and was recovered unaffected alongside the ex-
pected product 3ae (Scheme 5).14
Supporting Information for this article is available online at
O
Acknowledgment
O
O
Financial support from the EPSRC (EP/EO32168/1) and the Uni-
versity of Birmingham is gratefully acknowledged. We thank John-
son Matthey plc for a generous loan of metal salts. Instrumentation
used for this research was part supported by Birmingham Science
City AM2 with support from AWM and ERDF.
AuCl (5 mol%)
ClCH2CH2Cl
O
Ph
Ph
S
1a
2e
S
70 °C
O
OMe
3ae
80%
OMe
Ph
O
t-Bu
SMe
References and Notes
(1) Reviews: (a) Fürstner, A.; Davies, P. W. Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2007, 46, 3410. (b) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Hutchings, G. J.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7896. (c) Gorin, D. J.;
Toste, F. D. Nature (London) 2007, 446, 395. (d) Marion,
N.; Nolan, S. P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 2750.
(e) Marco-Contelles, J.; Soriano, E. Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13,
1350.
(2) Davies, P. W.; Albrecht, S. J.-C. Chem. Commun. 2008, 238.
(3) For our further studies into the formation of sulfur ylides
from alkynes, see: (a) Davies, P. W.; Albrecht, S. J. C.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 8372. (b) Davies, P. W.
Pure Appl. Chem. 2010, 82, 1537.
(4) For a diazo-free transition-metal-catalysed cyclisation–
aromatisation approach to generate sulfur ylides, see: Kato,
Y.; Miki, K.; Nishino, K. F.; Ohe, K.; Uemura, S. Org. Lett.
2003, 5, 2619.
(5) For examples of low-valent sulfur employed alongside
effective gold-catalysed organic synthesis, see:
(E/Z)-6gd
added and recovered
unchanged
Scheme 5 Control reaction to assess interconversion of isomers
This lack of interconversion between isomers is consistent
with the formation of 3 directly from 5 by transfer of the
allyl cation from sulfur to the nucleophilic C-3 carbon.
Though generally a facile process in sulfur ylide chemis-
try, the [2,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement of ylide 5 ap-
pears to be disfavored in this specific process in the
presence of a competing S–C allyl migration pathway.
Steric congestion between the nonmigrating S-substituent
and the enol acetate unit may affect the ability of 5 to
adopt the conformation about the S–C bond that is re-
quired for sigmatropic rearrangement. It is notable that in-
creasing quantities of [2,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement
product 6 are observed as the steric environment directly
at sulfur decreases, going from Caromatic, benzylic, and al-
(a) Nakamura, I.; Sato, T.; Yamamoto, Y. Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2006, 45, 4473. (b) Nakamura, I.; Bajracharya, G. B.;
Wu, H.; Oishi, K.; Mizushima, Y.; Gridnev, I. D.;
Yamamoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15423.
(c) Peng, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J. J. Org. Chem.
2007, 72, 1192. (d) Morita, N.; Krause, N. Angew. Chem.
Synlett 2012, 23, 70–73
© Thieme Stuttgart · New York