Resin -Bou n d Tr ia r yl Bism u th a n es a n d
Bism u th Dia ceta tes: Novel
Mu ltid ir ection a l Lin k er s a n d Novel
Resin -Bou n d Ar yla tion Rea gen ts
L. Kyhn Rasmussen,† Mikael Begtrup,† and
Thomas Ruhland*
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, H. Lundbeck A/ S,
F IGURE 1. The linker system.
9 Ottiliavej, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
SCHEME 1. Su zu k i’s Syn th esis of Resin -Bou n d
Bism u th a n es
tr@lundbeck.com
Received May 14, 2004
Abstr a ct: A general synthesis of resin-bound triaryl bis-
muthanes and resin-bound triaryl bismuth diacetates start-
ing from commercially available chloromethyl polystyrene
is reported. For the first time resin-bound bismuth has been
utilized as part of a multidirectional linker system for solid-
phase organic synthesis and as a resin-bound arylation
reagent.
synthesis of similar compounds by, for example, pal-
ladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions often requires
tedious optimization of the catalytic systems for each
individual case. We recognized that the combination of
the versatile chemistry of triaryl bismuthanes coupled
with the advantages of solid-phase chemistry would
provide a powerful tool for solid-phase and solution-phase
synthesis. In this paper we demonstrate that resin-bound
bismuth represents a new and flexible alternative to the
existing multidirectional linker methodologies.
Resin-bound triaryl pnictogenes (group 15 elements)
were first reported by Braun in 1962 while studying the
polymerization process of pnictogene-substituted styrene
monomers.19 Almost 40 years later, Suzuki reported an
improved synthesis of the monomers and their homopo-
lymerization.20
Despite their early description and their obvious
synthetic possibilities, resin-bound bismuthanes have, to
the best of our knowledge, been used neither in SPOS
nor as solid-phase reagents. The most likely explanations
are the difficulties in making a diverse range of differ-
ently substituted resin-bound bismuthanes and the lack
of selectivity by the cleavage of aryl groups from the
bismuth.
In the following we describe a strategy that enables
resin-bound bismuth to be used as a multidirectional
linker in SPOS. Our method allows a simple attachment
of bismuthanes without polymerization starting from
commercially available chloromethyl polystyrene. An-
other key issue in our design strategy was to achieve
sufficient discrimination between the two rather similar
Bi-sp2C bonds A and B shown in Figure 1. It is essential
In recent years intensive research efforts have been
directed toward increasing the flexibility in solid-phase
organic synthesis (SPOS) by means of new linker con-
cepts such as traceless linkers and multidirectional linker
systems.1 Multidirectional linker strategies are particular
attractive as they allow the synthesis of different scaf-
folds by the introduction of a wide range of diverse
fragments in the final cleavage step.
The recent discovery of the chemical potential of
triorganyl bismuth reagents in organic synthesis has
significantly expanded the chemical toolbox, especially
in the areas of mild and selective arylation reactions.2-6
In particular, the pioneering work of Barton et al. has
led to efficient methods for performing O-, N-, and
C-arylations with a wide range of substrates under mild
reaction conditions.7-14 In comparison to palladium-
catalyzed reactions, bismuth-assisted arylations have
only played an “exotic” role and their application to the
synthesis of bioactive compounds is scarce.15-18 The
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Phone: +45 3643
3304. Fax: +45 3643 8237.
† The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2 Univer-
sitetsparken, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
(1) Brase, S.; Dahmen, S. Chem. Eur. J . 2000, 6, 1899-1905.
(2) Barton, D. H. R.; Finet, J .-P. Pure Appl. Chem. 1987, 59, 937-
946.
(3) Abramovitch, R. A.; Barton, D. H. R.; Finet, J . P. Tetrahedron
1988, 44, 3039-3071.
(4) Finet, J . P. Chem. Rev. 1989, 7, 1487-1501.
(5) Suzuki, H.; Ikegami, T.; Matano, Y. Synthesis 1997, 3, 249-267.
(6) Elliott, G. I.; Konopelski, J . P. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 5683-5705.
(7) Barton, D. H. R.; Ozbalik, N.; Ramesh, M. Tetrahedron 1988,
44, 5661-5668.
(8) Barton, D. H. R.; Finet, J .-P.; Khamsi, J . Tetrahedron Lett. 1987,
28, 887-890.
(9) Barton, D. H. R.; Finet, J .-P.; Khamsi, J . Tetrahedron Lett. 1988,
29, 1115-1118.
(15) Sorenson, R. J . J . Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 7747-7749.
(16) Fan, P. C.; Ablordeppey, S. Y. J . Heterocycl. Chem. 1997, 34,
1789-1794.
(10) Chan, D. M. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 9013-9016.
(11) Arnauld, T.; Barton, D. H. R.; Doris, E. Tetrahedron 1997, 53,
4137-4144.
(17) Banfi, A.; Bartoletti, M.; Bellora, E.; Bignotti, M.; Turconi, M.
Synthesis 1994, 8, 775-776.
(12) Barton, D. H. R.; Finet, J .-P.; Khamsi, J .; Pichon, C. Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 1986, 27, 3619-3622.
(18) Morel, S.; Chatel, F.; Boyer, G.; Galy, J . P. J . Chem. Res., Synop.
1998, 1, 4-5.
(13) Barton, D. H. R.; Bhatnagar, N. Y.; Finet, J .-P.; Khamsi, J .;
Motherwell, W. B.;.Stanforth S. P. Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 323-332.
(14) Barton, D. H. R.; Finet, J .-P.; Khamsi, J . Tetrahedron Lett.
1986, 27, 3615-3618.
(19) Braun, B.; Diamon, H.; Becker, G. Makromol. Chem. 1963, 62,
183-195.
(20) Matano, Y.; Begum, S. A.; Suzuki, H. Synthesis 2001, 7, 1081-
1085.
10.1021/jo049183o CCC: $27.50 © 2004 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 09/02/2004
6890
J . Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 6890-6893