The protonation constants were determined from 3 indepen-
dent titrations (60–80 data points per titration). The complex for-
mation constants were evaluated from 5–10 independent
titrations (60–100 data points per titration), depending on the
complexity of the system. The metal-to-ligand ratios varied
between 1 : 4–1 : 1 and 2 : 1–1 : 2 in the binary ZnII–mUpU and
ZnII–2n systems, respectively, with the ZnII concentration in the
range of 0.7–1.6 mmol L−1. In the ZnII–2n–mUpU ternary
system the concentration ratios were 2 : 1 : 1, 1.5 : 2 : 1
and 1 : 1 : 1, with the ZnII concentration in the range of
Acknowledgements
Financial support from the Academy of Finland, the Hungarian
Scientific Research Found (OTKA K101541) and TÁMOP
4.2.1/B-09/1/KONV-2010-0005 is gratefully acknowledged.
A. J. wishes to thank the support of the János Bolyai research
fellowship.
0.7–1.6 mmol L−1
.
Notes and references
The comparison of the forward and backward titration curves
revealed slow kinetics of complex formation processes in the
ZnII–2n systems between pH 3.5–5. The difference between the
two titration curves decreased with increasing equilibration time,
and with increasing ligand excess (over Zn(II)). To minimize the
errors due to the slow kinetics, considerably increased equili-
bration time has been applied between pH 3.5–5 (the maximal
waiting time between two base addition was 30 min), which
resulted in 4–8 h titration time, depending on the metal-to-ligand
ratio. Under such conditions the difference between the forward
and backward titrations became negligible, especially at ligand
excess
1 S. A. Strobel, Nat. Chem. Biol., 2005, 1, 5; P. C. Bevilacqua and
R. Yajima, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2006, 10, 455.
2 E. Anslyn and R. Breslow, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 4473.
3 D. M. Perrault and E. V. Anslyn, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36,
432; M. Oivanen, S. Kuusela and H. Lönnberg, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98,
961; R. Breslow, S. D. Dong, Y. Webb and R. Xu, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1996, 118, 6588; A. J. Kirby and R. E. Marriott, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2, 2002, 422.
4 D. A. Usher and A. H. McHale, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1976, 73,
1149.
5 S. Aoki and E. Kimura, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 769; E. Kimura,
T. Shiota, M. Koike, M. Shiro and M. Kodama, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990,
112, 5805.
6 Q. Wang and H. Lönnberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 10716.
7 P. B. Rupert and A. R. Ferré-D’Amaré, Nature, 2001, 410, 780;
M. Martick and W. G. Scott, Cell, 2006, 126, 309; J. Han and J.
M. Burke, Biochemistry, 2005, 44, 7864.
8 S. Kuusela and H. Lönnberg, J. Phys. Org. Chem., 1993, 6, 347;
S. Kuusela and H. Lönnberg, J. Phys. Org. Chem., 1992, 5, 803.
9 E. Kimura, S. Aoki, T. Koike and M. Shiro, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997,
119, 3068.
10 J. Farràs, X. Ginesta, P. W. Sutton, J. Taltavull, F. Egeler, P. Romea,
F. Urpí and J. Villarasa, Tetrahedron, 2001, 57, 7665.
11 N. Ogasawara and Y. Inoue, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1976, 98, 7048.
12 C. F. Baes and R. E. Mesmer, The hydrolysis of Cations, John Wiley &
Sons, New York, 1976.
13 P. Davies and K. Wainwright, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1999, 294, 103.
14 M. Shionoya, E. Kimura and M. Shiro, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115,
6730.
15 E. Kimura, M. Kikuchi, H. Kitamura and T. Koike, Chem. Eur. J., 1999,
5, 3113.
16 C. Anda, A. Bencini, E. Berni, S. Ciattina, F. Chuburu, A. Danesi,
C. Giorgi, H. Handel, M. Le Baccon, P. Paoletti, R. Tripier, V. Turcy and
B. Valtancoli, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2005, 2044.
17 R. Haidar, M. Ipek, B. DasGupta, M. Yousaf and L. J. Zompa, Inorg.
Chem., 1997, 36, 3125.
18 P. Järvinen, M. Oivanen and H. Lönnberg, J. Org. Chem., 1991, 56,
5396.
19 T. Tashiro, J. Heterocycl. Chem., 2002, 39, 615.
20 M. Kosonen and H. Lönnberg, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1995,
1203.
21 M. Ora, H. Linjalahti and H. Lönnberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127,
1826.
22 H. Lönnberg, R. Strömberg and A. Williams, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2004,
2, 2165.
23 H. S. Harned and B. B. Owen, The Physical Chemistry of Electrolytic
Solutions, Reinhold Pub., New York, 1958.
Kinetic measurements
Reactions were carried out in sealed tubes immersed in a thermo-
stated water bath, the temperature of which was adjusted to
90 °C within 0.1 °C. The hydronium ion concentration of the
reaction solutions was adjusted with formate, acetate, MES and
HEPES buffers and sodium hydroxide and checked with a pH
meter. The ionic strength of the solutions was adjusted to
0.10 mol L−1 with NaClO4. The initial substrate concentration in
the kinetic runs was typically 5 μmol L−1. The composition of
the samples withdrawn at appropriate time intervals was ana-
lyzed by HPLC on a Hypersil-Keystone Aquasil C18 column (4
× 150 mm, 5 μm) using 0.06 mol L−1 acetate buffer and MeOH
as an eluent. For the first 10 min, only buffer was used, after
which the amount of MeOH was increased linearly from to 30%
during 5 min and kept there for another 5 min. The observed
retention times (tR, min) for the hydrolytic products of UpU
were as follows: 16.0 (3′,5′-UpU), 15.3 (2′,5′-UpU), 6.5 (Urd),
5.2 (2′-UMP), 4.6 (3′-UMP), 3.8 (2′,3′-cUMP). The products
were characterized by spiking with authentic samples. For the
experiments carried out in the presence of an excess of the cleav-
ing agent, pseudo first-order rate constants for the disappearance
of UpU were obtained by applying the integrated first-order rate
law to the time-dependent diminution of the relative peak area of
UpU. When the reaction rate was studied as a function of UpU
concentration at a constant limiting concentration of the cleaving
agent, initial rates were obtained as slopes of the plots of the
combined peak area of all the monomeric products (2′,3′-cUMP,
3′-UMP, 2′-UMP and uridine) as a function of reaction time.
24 L. Zékány, I. Nagypál and G. Peintler, PSEQUAD for chemical equili-
bria, Technical Software Distributors, Baltimore, 1991
25 F. J. C. Rosotti, H. Rosotti, in The determination of stability constants,
McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1962, pp. 149.
26 E. Högfeldt, in Stability Constants of Metal-Ion Complexes, Part
A. Inorganic Ligands, Pergamon, New York, 1982, pp. 32.
3338 | Dalton Trans., 2012, 41, 3328–3338
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012