Mendeleev Commun., 2012, 22, 85–86
Table 3 Preparation of 3b at room temperature.
R1
HN C(O)CH2Hal
NH3
NH3
Run
Time/h
Conversion (%)
Ratio 1b:3b
N
C(O)R2
– NH2C(O)CH2Hal
O
1: 2b + NH3
2: 2b + NaIa + NH3
48
24
24
24
95
85
490:1
4.1:1
1:3.1
1:9.9
2
R1
HN C(O)CH2Hal
NH2
R1
NH2
3: 2e + NH3
100
100
N
N
O
C(O)R2
4: 5b + NH3
OH
R2
O
a Equimolar amount of NaI was added.
A
1
R1
HN C(O)CH2Hal
R1
HN C(O)CH2I
NaI,
MeCN
NH3
OH
O
3a–d
R1
R1
NH2
N
N
C(O)R2
C(O)R2
5a–d
15 min
HN
CH2Hal
CH2Hal
O
O
NH
NH
2a–d
N
N
O
O
OH
OH
Scheme 3
R2
R2
– 2 H2O
4
B
C
in case of deactivated and/or sterically hindered systems, iodo-
acetylated derivatives provide better yields of the fused diazepines
than analogous chloroacetylated or bromoacetylated ones.
Other diazepines 3a,c,d were synthesised under the conditions
for preparation of 3b. Isoxazolodiazepine 3d was obtained in good
yield from iodoacetylated compound 5d. 5-Iodomethyl- or 5-amino-
methylisoxazolo[4,5-d]pyrimidine similar to 4d was not detected.
The structures of the prepared compounds were confirmed
by microanalysis, HRMS, H NMR and UV spectral data (see
Online Supplementary Materials).
The procedure developed can be recommended for the prepara-
tion of similar isoxazolo[4,5-e][1,4]diazepin-5-ones from the cor-
responding deactivated electron-poor isoxazole derivatives.
Scheme 2
with high rates of deacetylation, but in case of the direct nucleo-
philic attack of ammonia on carbonyl group of the chloroacetyl
moiety one should expect approximately equal rates of deacetyla-
tion because the basicities of aminoisoxazoles are not different
in fact. However, ammonolysis affords fundamentally different
products at relatively small changes in the amino group basicities.
Based on these findings we assume that the main reaction path-
way (Scheme 2) includes a rapid nucleophilic attack of ammonia
on the ketone group with the formation of the intermediate hemi-
aminal A (aminal group is not strongly electron-withdrawing).
Next, the key intermediate B is formed, which is favoured by
the presence of 3-positioned electron-withdrawing group (e.g.,
carbamoyl) in the isoxazole ring. Further cleavage of the amide
bond results in deacylation to give aminoisoxazoles 1. When
R1 is phenyl, elimination of two water molecules is preferential
to produce isoxazolopyrimidine 4. Since ketone group is more
electrophilic than carbamoyl one, a direct ammonia-assisted
cleavage of amide bond does not make a considerable contribution
in total yields of aminoisoxazoles 1. In case of electron-rich rings
such as benzene, thiophene and similar rings, the ketone group is
insufficiently electrophilic and a halogen substitution proceeds
more quickly than the addition of ammonia to the ketone group.
The bromoacetylated compound 2e and iodoacetylated com-
pound 5b affords predominantly diazepine 3b (Scheme 3, Table 3).†
Iodoacetylated compounds 5a–d were prepared by the Finkelstein
reaction in acetonitrile and isolated before the cyclization.
When the Finkelstein reaction and treatment with ammonia
were conducted sequentially in the same vessel without isolation
of iodoacetylated compound 5b, the parent aminoisoxazole 1b
was predominantly formed (Table 3, run 2). On the other hand,
when the process was carried out in liquid ammonia, iodides gave
lower yields than bromides.16
1
Online Supplementary Materials
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found
in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.mencom.2012.03.011.
References
1 N. A. Meanwell and M. A. Walker, in Comprehensive Heterocyclic
Chemistry III, eds. A. R. Katritzky, C. A. Ramsden, E. F. V. Scriven and
R. J. K. Taylor, Elsevier, 2008, vol. 13, p. 183.
2 G. A. Archer and L. H. Sternbach, Chem. Rev., 1968, 68, 747.
3 V. P. Kislyi, E. B. Danilova and V. V. Semenov, Adv. Heterocycl. Chem.,
2007, 94, 177.
4 G. Dannhardt, P. Dominiak and S. Laufer, Arch. Pharm., 1991, 324, 141.
5 R. Nesi, D. Giomi, S. Papaleo, P. Tedeschi and F. Ponticelli, Gazz. Chim.
Ital., 1990, 120, 725.
6 R. Jaunin, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1974, 57, 1934.
7 V. P. Kislyi, E. B. Danilova, V. V. Semenov, A. A. Yakovenko and F. M.
Dolgushin, Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Khim., 2006, 1773 (Russ. Chem. Bull.,
Int. Ed., 2006, 55, 1840).
8 K. Gewald, P. Bellmann and H.-J. Jaensch, Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1980,
1623.
9 G. M. Clarke, J. B. Lee, F. J. Swinbourne and B. Williamson, J. Chem.
Res., Miniprint, 1980, 4745.
10 J. S. Baum, M. E. Condon and D. A. Shook, J. Org. Chem., 1987, 52, 2983
.
11 (a) A. J. Boulton and A. R. Katritzky, Tetrahedron, 1961, 12, 51;
(b) A. Garrone, R. Fruttero, C. Tironi and A. Gasco, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2, 1989, 1941.
Attempts to obtain diazepine 3b by other synthetic schemes
were less successful. A condensation of aminoisoxazole 1b with
glycine ethyl ester hydrochloride leads to diazepine 3b in very low
yield (3%). An attempt to use hexamethylenetetramine (hexamine)
instead of ammonia under the conditions previously published6,17
affords isoxazolodiazepine 3b contaminated with side products.
As previously reported,17 in reaction with hexamine, formed form-
aldehyde produces isoxazolones and dihydropyrimidines. Hence,
12 A. Albert and E. P. Serjeant, The Determination of Ionization Constants,
2nd edn., Chapman and Hall, London, 1971.
13 K. Yates and H. Wai, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1964, 86, 5408.
14 R. F. Cookson, Chem. Rev., 1974, 74, 5.
15 J. T. Sharp, I. Gosney and A. G. Rowley, Practical Organic Chemistry.
A Student Handbook of Techniques, Chapman&Hall, London, 1989.
16 L. H. Sternbach, R. I. Fryer, W. Metlesics, E. Reeder, G.Sach, G. Saucy
and A. Stempel, J. Org. Chem., 1962, 27, 3788.
†
General procedure for the preparation of isoxazolo[4,5-e][1,4]diazepines
17 G. M. Clarke, J. B. Lee, F. J. Swinbourne and B. Williamson, J. Chem.
Res., Miniprint, 1980, 4777.
3a–d. 5% Methanolic ammonia (4–8 ml) was added to 1 mmol of halo-
acetylated aminoisoxazoles 5a–d or 2e. After 1–2 days, volatiles were
evaporated under vacuum and chromatography on a dry column15 with a
mixture of benzene and ethyl acetate (10:1, then 1:1) as eluent gave, after
recrystallization from ethanol (methanol), the colourless analytical sample
of 3a–d.
Received: 2nd September 2011; Com. 11/3791
– 86 –