alkenyl alcohols,26 allylic amines and amides.27 However,
none of these systems permitted to convert our test sub-
strate, oleic acid, into an equilibrium mixture of isomers
within a few hours at catalyst loadings below 1%.19
In our search for new lead structures for highly active
isomerization catalysts, reports by Mingos/Vilar and
Hartwig on the dimeric palladium complex [Pd(μ-Br)-
(PtBu3)]2 caught our attention.28 They discovered that this
unusual, dimeric PdI species, which has found applica-
tions in catalytic cross-coupling reactions,29 can be
converted into hydridopalladium(II) complexes under
remarkably mild conditions. We reasoned that a metal
complex with such strong tendency to form PdÀH species,
which are known to add across CÀC double-bonds,22,30
should also be an excellent catalyst for alkene isomeriza-
tion. Indeed, oleic acid was converted to an equilibrium
mixture of double-bond isomers with only 0.5 mol % of
[Pd(μ-Br)(PtBu3)]2 within less than an hour.31
The high activity of this one-component system led us to
evaluate the catalytic activity of the PdI dimer as the
catalyst for double-bond migrations in a range of standard
test substrates. As a reference system, we used a mixture
of Pd(dba)2, isobutyryl chloride, and tri(tert-butyl)-
phosphine. This catalyst has been shown by Lindhardt
and Skrydstrup to set new standards with regard to
catalytic activity and functional group tolerance for sin-
gle-carbon migrations of various double bonds.32 The
examples in Scheme 2 demonstrate that the PdI dimer is
an effective catalyst for double-bond migrations in allylic
arenes (5), amides (7), ethers (9), and alcohols (11 and 13).
In each case, the catalyst loading was reduced to the
minimum effective level, in order to differentiate between
the systems. For all substrate classes, the PdI dimer com-
pared favorably even to the state-of-the-art Pd-catalyst for
single-carbon migration of the double-bond. It is also able
to move the bond over longer alkyl chains. Thus, hexanal
(14) was obtained from 5-hexen-1-ol (13) in high yield and
selectivity.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Enol Esters via Catalytic Isomerization
The catalytic isomerization of allylic esters to enol esters
would be anattractivealternative tothe aboveapproaches,
because the starting materials are easily accessible by
esterification of carboxylic acids (Scheme 1). However,
because of the weak thermodynamic driving force for the
double-bond migration and the tendency of many metal
catalysts to insert into the C(allyl)ÀO bond with formation
of stable carboxylate complexes,15 this reaction is beyond
the performance limit of most isomerization catalysts.
Even for unsubstituted allyl esters, only two reports of
double-bond migrations exist. Iranpoor et al. found that
stoichiometric amounts of Fe3(CO)12 promote this reaction
when irradiated with UV light.16 Krompiec et al. achieved
up to eight catalytic turnovers for the double-bond
migration, along with C(allyl)ÀO bond cleavage, using
the ruthenium hydride complex RuClH(CO)(PPh3)3.17
Mechanistic studies by Tokunaga et al. confirmed the
low catalytic activity of Ru complexes for this type of
substrate.18
In the context of our research on isomerizing functio-
nalizations of fatty acids,19 we had thoroughly investi-
gated the activity of various isomerization methods
involving acid20 or base mediators,21 as well as metal
catalysts reported for the isomerization of alkenes,22
allylic benzenes,23 allylic ethers,15,24 allylic silyl ethers,25
(13) Ye, S.; Leong, W. K. J. Organomet. Chem. 2006, 691, 1216.
(14) Lumbroso, A.; Koschker, P.; Vautravers, N. R.; Breit, B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 2386.
ꢀ
(15) Kuznik, N.; Krompiec, S. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2007, 251, 222.
(16) (a) Iranpoor, N.; Imanieh, H.; Iran, S.; Forbes, E. J. Synth.
Commun. 1989, 19, 2955. (b) Iranpoor, N.; Mottaghinejad, E.
J. Organomet. Chem. 1992, 423, 399.
(17) Krompiec, S.; Kuznik, N.; Krompiec, M.; Penczek, R.;
Mrzigod, J.; Torz, A. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2006, 253, 132.
(18) Four days at 80 °C were required to achieve 92% conversion of
allyl benzoate: Nakamura, A.; Hamasaki, A.; Goto, S.; Utsunomiya,
M.; Tokunaga, M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 973.
(19) Ohlmann, D. M.; Gooßen, L. J.; Dierker, M. Chem.;Eur. J.
2011, 17, 9508.
(20) Lee, P. H.; Kang, D.; Choi, S.; Kim, S. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3470.
(21) For examples, see: (a) Sagoet, O.; Monteux, D.; Langlois, Y.;
Riche, C.; Chiaroni, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 7019. (b) Su, C.;
Williard, P. G. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5378.
(22) For examples, see: (a) Harrod, J. F.; Chalk, A. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1966, 88, 3491. (b) Casey, C. P.; Cyr, C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973,
95, 2248. (c) Grotjahn, D. B.; Larsen, C. R.; Gustafson, J. L.; Nair, R.;
Sharma, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9592.
(23) For examples, see: (a) Lastra-Barreira, B.; Francos, J.; Crochet,
P.; Cadierno, V. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 307. (b) Golborn, P.; Scheinmann,
F. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1973, 2870. (c) Mayer, M.; Welther, A.;
von Wangelin, A. J. ChemCatChem 2011, 3, 1567.
(24) For examples, see: (a) Yamamoto, Y.; Fujikawa, R.; Miyaura,
N. Synth. Commun. 2000, 30, 2383. (b) Carless, H. A.; Haywood, D. J.
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1980, 980. (c) Crivello, J. V.; Kong, S.
J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 6745.
The most striking result obtained in this series of test
reactions was that allyl benzoate (3a) was cleanly con-
verted to the corresponding enol ester 4a. Using only
0.25 mol % of PdI in toluene, near-quantitative conversion
to 1-propenyl benzoate (4a) was achieved within 2 h at
50 °C, with a product (E/Z)-ratio of 1:2. The only other
component detected in the reaction mixture was 2% of the
(27) (a) Krompiec, S.; Krompiec, M.; Penczek, R.; Ignasiak, H.
Coord. Chem. Rev. 2008, 252, 1819. (b) Escoubet, S.; Gastaldi, S.;
Bertrand, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 18, 3855.
ꢁ
ꢁ
(28) (a) Dura-Vila, V.; Mingos, D. M. P.; Vilar, R.; White, A. J.P.;
ꢁ
ꢁ
Williams, D. J. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 600, 198. (b) Dura-Vila, V.;
Mingos, D. M. P.; Vilar, R.; White, A. J.P.; Williams, D. Chem.
Commun. 2000, 1525. (c) Barrios-Landeros, F.; Carrow, B. P.; Hartwig,
J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 5842.
(29) (a)Colacot, T. J. Platinum Met. Rev. 2009, 53, 183. (b) Johansson,
C. C. C.; Colacot, T. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 676. Angew.
Chem. 2010, 122, 686. (c) Proutiere, F; Aufiero, M; Schoenebeck, F
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 606.
(30) Hartley, F. R. Chem. Rev. 1969, 69, 799.
(25) Sodeoka, M.; Yamada, H.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1990, 112, 4906.
(26) (a) Van der Drift, R. C.; Bouwman, E.; Drent, E. J. Organomet.
(31) This reactivity has also been exploited in isomerizing olefin
metatheses: Ohlmann, D. M.; Tschauder, N.; Stockis, J.-P.; Gooßen,
K.; Dierker, M.; Gooßen, L. J. submitted for publication (2012).
(32) Gauthier, D.; Lindhardt, A. T.; Olsen, E. P. K.; Overgaard, J.;
Skrydstrup, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 7998.
ꢀ
ꢀ
Chem. 2002, 650, 1. (b) Uma, R.; Crevisy, C.; Gree, R. Chem. Rev. 2003,
103, 27.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 14, 2012
3717