G. G. de la Cruz et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 3731–3734
3733
Table 1
to be of sufficient reactivity, not requiring the use of more reactive
(and expensive) 1,4-cyclohexadiene or 1-methyl-1-cyclohexene,
which have recently been also used in microwave-assisted cata-
lytic transfer hydrogenations.12 In the event, clean and complete
reduction of the nitro group was obtained employing 7 mol % of
a standard 5% (w/w) Pt/C hydrogenation catalyst, 10 equiv of cyclo-
hexene as donor and ethanol as the solvent at 160 °C (14 bar) with-
in 30 min, providing a 75% isolated yield of target structure 1
(SEA0400). Lower reaction temperatures and/or catalyst/donor
stoichiometries, or the use of Pd/C as a catalyst led to a significant
decrease in conversion or selectivity.
In a further attempt to improve the synthetic protocol, we addi-
tionally performed the hydrogenation 7?1 under continuous flow
conditions using the H-Cube reactor.13,14 The flow hydrogenation
7?1 was initially optimized using catalyst cartridges filled with
Pd/C, RaNi or Pt/C and ethanol as a reaction solvent. Although
Pd/C as well as Pt/C gave promising results, Ra/Ni proved to be
the ultimate catalyst of choice, providing high selectivity for the ni-
tro-group reduction at 55 °C and 30 bar of H2-gas. Applying a 1 mL/
min flow rate and 10 mg/mL substrate concentration prevented the
formation of side products and provided SEA0400 in quantitative
isolated yield, thus improving the overall yield of the three-step
synthesis up to ꢀ70%.
Optimization of Baeyer–Villiger oxidation 4?4aa
Entry
A/B(equiv)
T (°C)
Conversionb (%)
4a/5b (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2/0.1
2/0.1
2/0.1
2/0.2
2/0.2
2/0.1
2/—
70
100
120
120
130
130
130
130
130
72
96
97
98
98
94
6
91
72/—
94/2
93/4
95/3
88/10
90/4
6/—
1.5/0.2
2.5/0.2
89/2
92/8
100 (72)c
a
Reaction conditions: 0.1 mmol of acetophenone 4, 1.5–2.5 equiv of m-CPBA and
0–0.2 equiv of p-TSA in CH2Cl2 (2 mL). Single-mode microwave heating (Biotage
Initiator 2.5) with magnetic stirring and IR temperature control.
b
Based on HPLC–UV analysis (215 nm).
Isolated yield.
c
Chromatographic work-up provided 71% isolated yield of 4-(2,5-
difluorobenzyloxy)phenol 5, matching the yield presented in the
patent for this two step synthesis. However, instead of the required
4 days at room temperature (Scheme 1),5 the combined reaction
time under microwave conditions is only ꢀ25 min (Scheme 2).
At this stage, we evaluated the possibility to obtain the key phe-
nol intermediate 5 directly from 2,5-difluorobenzyl bromide 2 and
hydroquinone in a one-step procedure. Work by Feringa and
coworkers has indicated that mono-benzylated hydroquinones
can be obtained in satisfactory selectivity and yield by simply heat-
ing a benzyl chloride with a large excess (4 equiv) of hydroquinone
in acetone/K2CO3 under reflux conditions for 12 h.8 Gratifyingly,
this method could be successfully translated to benzyl bromide 2
and high-temperature microwave conditions (160 °C, 12 bar), pro-
viding 4-(2,5-difluorobenzyloxy)phenol 5 in 74% isolated yield
after 20 min, with only 7% of the dibenzylated hydroquinone being
formed as a byproduct. Although the yield of phenol 5 using this
one-step method may not appear attractive at first glance, the
operational simplicity avoiding the often difficult to scale Bae-
yer–Villiger oxidation step, combined with the low cost of hydro-
quinone, makes this direct route to phenol 5 very appealing.
The next step in the synthesis of SEA0400 was an SNAr-substi-
tution reaction to prepare 1-(4-(2,5-difluorobenzyloxy)phenoxy)-
4-ethoxy-2-nitrobenzene (7).5 Using phenol 5 and 4-ethoxy-1-flu-
oro-2-nitrobenzene (6a)—readily prepared from commercially
available 4-fluoro-3-nitrophenol (6) via O-alkylation with diethyl
sulfate (MeCN, 120 °C, 10 min)—as starting materials optimization
experiments quickly demonstrated that the original DMF reflux
conditions (150 °C) requiring 5 h for completion could be improved
to 40 min in a sealed microwave vial at 180 °C (2 bar). Clean and
complete SNAr-substitution was obtained using K2CO3 instead of
the originally reported t-BuOK as a base providing a 94% isolated
product yield after flash column chromatography.
In conclusion, we have presented an intensified synthetic proto-
col for the generation of SEA0400, a selective Na+/Ca2+ exchanger
(NCX) inhibitor, using controlled microwave heating and continu-
ous-flow hydrogenation technology. Employing automated sealed-
vessel microwave reactors, optimum reaction conditions were
readily obtained, resulting in a drastic reduction of the required
reaction and overall processing times compared to the protocol
described in the patent literature. Replacing the original Baeyer–
Villiger/hydrolysis sequence with a simple and direct nucleophilic
substitution step using inexpensive hydroquinone as a starting
material additionally simplifies the synthetic process. We believe
that this new high-speed method will be of importance for efficient
generation of SEA0400 analogs for pharmacological testing.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant for the Christian Doppler
Research Foundation (CDG). G.G. de la Cruz thanks the Gobierno
de Canarias for the provided financial support.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. (a) Toth, A.; Kiss, L.; Varro, A.; Nanasi, P. P. Curr. Med. Chem. 2009, 16, 3294–
3321. and references therein; (b) Farkas, A. S.; Acsai, K.; Nagy, N.; Toth, A.;
Fülöp, F.; Seprenyi, G.; Birinyi, P.; Nanasi, P. P.; Forster, T.; Csanady1, M.; Papp, J.
P.; Varro, A.; Farkas, A. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 154, 93–104; (c) Iwamoto, T.; Kita,
S. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2004, 259, 157–161; (d) Kamimura, D.; Ohtani, T.; Sakata,
Y.; Mano, T.; Takeda, Y.; Tamaki, S.; Omori, Y.; Tsukamoto, Y.; Furutani, K.;
Komiyama, Y.; Yoshika, M.; Takahashi, H.; Matsuda, T.; Baba, A.; Umemura, S.;
Pharmacol. Ther. 2012, 134, 26–42.
2. Matsuda, T.; Arakawa, N.; Takuma, K.; Kishida, Y.; Kawasaki, Y.; Sakaue, M.;
Takahashi, K.; Takahashi, T.; Suzuki, T.; Ota, T.; Hamano-Takahashi, A.; Onishi,
M.; Tanaka, Y.; Kameo, K.; Baba, A. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2001, 298, 249–256.
3. (a) Blaustein, M. P.; Charpentier, T. H.; Weber, D. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
2007, 104, 18349–18350; (b) Namekata, I.; Nakamura, H.; Shimada, H.; Tanaka,
H.; Shigenobu, K. Life Sci. 2005, 77, 312–324; (c) Tanaka, H.; Nishimaru, K.;
Aikawa, T.; Hirayama, W.; Tanaka, Y.; Shigenobu, K. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2002, 135,
1096–1100; (d) Birinyi, P.; Acsai, K.; Banyasz, T.; Toth, A.; Horvath, B.; Virag, L.;
Szentandrassy, N.; Magyar, J.; Varro, A.; Fülöp, F.; Nanasi, P. P. Naunyn
Finally, several options among the plethora of available meth-
ods9 were considered for the reduction of the aromatic nitro group
in 7 to the corresponding amine: (i) hydrogenation with molecular
hydrogen under pressure using controlled microwave conditions,10
(ii) reduction with the Fe/NH4Cl catalytic system as disclosed in the
original patent,5 or (iii) a catalytic transfer hydrogenation with Pd/
C or Pt/C and cyclohexene as a hydrogen donor.11 For safety and
convenience reasons, not requiring a specialized microwave appa-
ratus that allows pre-pressurization of the sealed reaction vial with
hydrogen gas, we opted for the transfer hydrogenation method. For
the nitro group reduction 7?1 (Scheme 2), cyclohexene was found