Recently, we locked the 6-hydroxyl groups of glucose
and mannose acceptors by making use of a spiroannulated
cyclopropane ring at C-5 bearing one hydroxyl group.8,9
In the present communication, we report on the prepara-
tion of the corresponding mannosyl donor, its behavior in
glycosylation reactions, and its incorporation in model
trisaccharides.
by NOE experiments. In a SimmonsÀSmithÀFurukawa
reaction13 the olefinic moiety was transformed into the
three-membered cyclopropane ring. While the total yield
was good, almost no facial selectivity was observed. With
the assumption that both axially oriented OR groups in
position 1, as well as in position 2, coordinate to the zinc,
the result would be an equal probability of attack from the
top or bottom side. Both diastereoisomers 5a and 5b were
unequivocally assigned by NOE investigations (see Sup-
porting Information). Attempts to remove the MP group
from 5a/5b proved to be challenging. Earlier investigations
using the bulky thexyldimethylsilyl (TDS) group at the
anomeric position were futile. Fluoride sources and the use
of HCl generated in situ were not compatible with the
electron-rich cyclopropane moiety. Commonly, the oxidiz-
ing agent cerium ammonium nitrate (CAN) to remove MP
groups is employed in a three-component solvent mix-
ture of acetonitrile, toluene, and water.14 However, due to
the cerium(III) and the ammonium, the pH value of the
aqueous phase is lowered significantly. Thus, using com-
mon deprotection conditions also led to complete decom-
position of the product. However, the use of a buffered
solution (phosphate buffer, pH 7) leveraged a successful
cleavage of the anomeric MP group leading to the produc-
tion of hemiacetal 6. The latter was transformed under
common conditions into the trichloroacetimidate 7;15 in
this step the R-trichloroacetimidate was formed as the
major anomer.
Investigations into the use of previously prepared cyclo-
propyl-modified methyl glycosides as donors, similar to
Hotha’s workusingAucatalysis,10 wereinvain. Therefore,
we decided to prepare conventional trichloroacetimidates
via the respective hemiacetals. The challenge was to iden-
tify a suitable, easily cleavable anomeric protecting group
without destroying the doubly donor-substituted cyclo-
propane motif. The latter is accessible via an exocyclic enol
ether as previously demonstrated.8,11 Since our main inter-
est was to determine how the three-membered ring affects
the glycosylation behavior, we chose a protected mannose
with a nonparticipating group in position 2. The β/R ratio
obtained in a respective glycosylation should give a hint
about whether the stiff cyclopropane, as in the case of the
4,6-benzylidene group, might be similarly influential.
We commenced the preparation of such a mannosyl
donor by using R-methoxyphenyl (MP) mannoside 212
(Scheme 1). The primary hydroxyl group of 2 was effi-
ciently protected with TIPSCl. Perbenzylation and TIPS de-
protection afforded 3. The latter compound was subjected to
Swern oxidation and the resulting aldehyde was subsequently
transformed to the respective enol acetate 4 in a solution of
acetic anhydride, acetonitrile, and potassium carbonate.
Surprisingly, high selectivity for the (Z)-configured dia-
stereomer 4 (72% over two steps) was observedand proven
With this donor 7r in hand we studied its behavior in
glycosylation reactions (Table 1). Several acceptors 8aÀ8f
bearing primary and secondary hydroxyl groups were
employed. In almost all cases good yields were obtained
(42À88%); the three-membered ring remained untouched
in the products 9À14. A careful analysis of the two anomers
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Cyclopropyl-Modified Mannosyl
Trichloroacetimidate 7
(6) Selected examples: (a) Postema, M. H. D.; Piper, J. L.; Komanduri,
V.; Liu, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2915–2918. (b) Dondoni, A.;
Mariotti, G.; Marra, A. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 4475–4486. (c) Koester,
D. C.; Leibeling, M.; Neufeld, R.; Werz, D. B. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3934–
3937. (d) Pachamuthu, K.; Schmidt, R. R. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 160–187.
(e) Renaudet, O.; Dumy, P. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 2127–2135.
(7) (a) Tietze, L. F.; Keim, H.; Janssen, C. O.; Tappertzhofen, C.;
Olschimke, J. Chem.;Eur. J. 2000, 6, 2801–2808. (b) Jensen, H. H.;
Nordstrøm, L. U.; Bols, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9205–9213.
(8) Brand, C.; Granitzka, M.; Stalke, D.; Werz, D. B. Chem. Com-
mun. 2011, 47, 10782–10784.
(9) Spiroannulated cyclopropanes without hydroxyl groups were syn-
thesized before: Bluechel, C.; Ramana, C. V.; Vasella, A. Helv. Chim. Acta
2003, 86, 2998–3036.
(10) Vidadala, S. R.; Hotha, S. Chem. Commun. 2009, 2505–2507.
(11) Exo- and endocyclic enol ethers proved to be highly reactive
substrates for cyclopropanation reactions: (a) Brand, C.; Rauch, G.;
Zanoni, M.; Dittrich, B.; Werz, D. B. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 8779–8786.
(b) Schneider, T. F.; Kaschel, J.; Dittrich, B.; Werz, D. B. Org. Lett.
2009, 11, 2317–2320. (c) Schneider, T. F.; Kaschel, J.; Awan, S. I.;
Dittrich, B.; Werz, D. B. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 11276–11288.
ꢀ
(12) Faure, R.; Shiao, T. C.; Damerval, S.; Roy, R. Tetrahedron Lett.
2007, 48, 2385–2388.
(13) (a) Simmons, H. E.;Smith, R. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81, 4256–
4264. (b) Furukawa, J.; Kawabata, N.; Nishimura, J. Tetrahedron 1968, 24,
53–58. (c) Furukawa, J.; Kawabata, N.; Nishimura, J. Tetrahedron Lett.
1966, 7, 3353–3354. (d) Song, Z.; Lu, T.; Hsung, R. P.; Al-Rashid, Z. F.;
Ko, C.; Tang, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4069–4072.
(14) Werz, D. B.; Seeberger, P. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
6315–6318.
(15) Schmidt, R. R.; Michel, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1980, 19,
731–732.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX