Alkyne Hydrothiolation
COMMUNICATION
À
the scope of this process even further, reactions were per-
formed with different aryl-substituted alkynes, including 1-
ethynyl-4-fluorobenzene, 1-ethynyl-4-bromobenzene, and 2-
ethynylpyridine, for which the anti-Markovnikov adducts of
type C were selectively formed within only 15 min (Table 1)
for all of the reactions examined.
Pd S bond (Figure 1, left) over nucleophilic attack
(Figure 1, right).
The reaction mechanisms described herein are assumed to
operate in these reactions. Both, the alkyne insertion mecha-
nism and the nucleophilic attack are initiated by the oxida-
tive addition of a thiol to the metal center of bis[1-(dicyclo-
hexylphosphanyl)piperidine]palladium(0) (2), which is gen-
erated by the reaction of 1 with OHÀ.[11] This results in the
formation of the respective thiolate hydride complexes, and
is followed by alkyne coordination. Whereas a subsequent
nucleophilic attack affords the palladium hydride vinyl sul-
fide intermediate when aromatic alkynes were used, migra-
Internal alkynes also react with thiols to yield the respec-
tive addition products, but require slightly prolonged reac-
tion times (2 h) for high conversions. For example, thermal
treatment of 1,1’-ethyne-1,2-diyldibenzene with thiophenol
exclusively gave phenyl (Z)-2-phenylethenyl sulfide, that is,
the addition product with cis-configuration, in a yield of
93%. The same stereoselectivity was observed if other thiols
were applied in the reaction (Table 2). However, although
smooth product formation was noticed, the use of unsym-
metrical internal alkynes proceeded with rather modest re-
gioselectivity. For example, thermal treatment of prop-1-yn-
1-ylbenzene with thiophenol (or 1-hexanethiol) gave mix-
tures of phenyl (1E)-1-phenylprop-1-en-2-yl sulfide and
phenyl (1Z)-1-phenylprop-1-en-2-yl sulfide (or hexyl (1E)-1-
phenylprop-1-en-2-yl sulfide and hexyl (1Z)-1-phenylprop-1-
en-2-yl sulfide) in a ratio between 1:1 and 2:1, in favor of
the less-hindered isomer, most probably due to a change in
the mechanism (for details of the formation of different ad-
dition products through the alkyne insertion mechanism and
the nucleophilic attack, see Figure 1).
À
tion into the Pd S bond is favored for aliphatic alkynes. Re-
action steps involving cis/trans isomerization of vinyl sul-
fides, however, have been excluded because the transforma-
tion of phenyl (Z)-2-phenylethenyl sulfide into its E isomer
by thermal treatment (under the reaction conditions applied
for the catalysis) was not observed. Reductive elimination
(or an eventual protonolysis) yields the addition products
and regenerates the catalyst for both mechanisms. Although
not explicitly mentioned, aminophosphine dissociation and
re-coordination may be involved at any of the reaction
steps. However, initial formation of complex 2 by reaction
of 1 with OHÀ gained strong experimental support: whereas
the conversion rates and product selectivities remain the
same for all types of substrate when alkyne hydrothiolation
reactions are catalyzed by 1 in the presence of only
10 mol% of the base, mixtures of all possible addition prod-
ucts and their isomers are formed with aliphatic alkynes in
the absence of base. This is most probably due to product
formation by both the alkyne insertion mechanism and the
nucleophilic attack mechanism.[12] Even more importantly,
complex 2 is an excellent alkyne hydrothiolation catalyst,
showing the same catalytic ac-
On the other hand, if aliphatic alkynes (e.g., 1-octyne)
were thermally treated with thiols, the branched Markovni-
kov-type addition products A, which are susceptible to iso-
merization, were favorably formed (ꢀ80%). The striking
difference in product selectivity obtained with aliphatic al-
kynes is most probably due to their lower ligating tendency,
favoring, in contrast to aromatic alkynes, insertion into the
tivity and product selectivity
Table 2. Hydrothiolation of aliphatic (terminal), as well as internal alkynes with thiols, catalyzed by 1.[a]
with both aliphatic and aromat-
ic substrates as complex 1, even
in the absence of base. Further-
more, treatment of 2 with phe-
nylmethanethiol, for example,
instantly yielded the respective
hydride thiolate pal
complex [(P{(NC5H10)-
(C6H11)2})2Pd(H)(SCH2C6H5)]
ACHTUNGTRENUNlNG adium(II)
AHCTUNGTRENNUNG
A
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
(3) at 258C as proposed in the
catalytic cycle. Significantly,
complex 3 also shows the same
catalytic performance and prod-
uct selectivity, in the presence
and absence of base, as 1 and
2.[13] Finally, molecular mecha-
nisms do indeed operate, as the
involvement of palladium nano-
particles has been excluded
(see below).
[a] Reaction conditions: alkyne (1.3 mmol), thiol (1.0 mmol), NaOH (1.0 mmol), NMP (2 mL), catalyst
(0.05 mol%) in solution (THF), at 1208C. The conversions and product ratios (cis/trans/gem) were determined
by GC/MS and are based on the amount of thiol, as well as by NMR spectroscopy. Isolated yields are given in
brackets and were obtained after 15 min when the reactions were performed with terminal alkynes and after
2 h with internal alkynes.
Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 00, 0 – 0
ꢁ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
&
3
&
ÞÞ
These are not the final page numbers!