Job/Unit: Z12212
/KAP1
Date: 31-07-12 10:25:12
Pages: 6
H. V. Rasika Dias, V. M. Jiménez-Pérez et al.
ARTICLE
Crystal Structure Determination: The data for 1 was collected at 6.86%; found: C 76.53, H 9.99, N 7.06%.1H NMR (400.13 MHz,
298(1) K and a suitable crystal of cis-2 was covered with a layer of CDCl3): δ = 8.89 (s, N-H, 2 H), 7.24 (d, 4 H), 7.22 (t, 2 H), 3.08 (sept,
hydrocarbon oil that was selected and mounted with paratone-N oil on
a cryo-loop, and immediately placed in the low-temperature nitrogen δ = 159.67 (C=O, 2C), 145.86 (Cq, C2), 129.83 (Cq, C3), 123.83 (C4),
iPr, 4 H), 1.24 (d, CH3, 24 H) ppm. 13C NMR (100.5 MHz, CDCl3):
stream at 100(2) K. The data for 1 was collected on Siemens P4, with
129.0 (C5), 29.17 (C6), 23.66 (C7) 158.17 (C1), 132.38 (C3), 135.07
a graphite monochromator. The data for cis-3 was recorded with a (C4), 128.4 (C5 and C6), 18.54 (C7) ppm. TOF-MS: [M+]
Bruker SMART APEX CCD area detector system equipped with a C26H36N2O2: 409.2849 a.m.u, found: 409.2851 a.m.u. (Error = -
Oxford Cryosystems 700 Series Cryostream cooler, a graphite mono-
0.002ppm). IR (KBr): ν˜ = 3225 (N–H), 2964 (C–H), 1663 (C=O),
chromator, and a Mo-Kα fine-focus sealed tube (λ = 0.71073 Å). Both 1497 (C–N), 1218 (C–O), 903, 801, 728 cm–1.
structures were solved by direct methods using SHELXS-97[28] and
Synthesis of Complex 3: A solution of n-butyllithium in n-hexane
refined against F2 on all data by full-matrix least-squares with
SHELXL-97.[29]
(1.6 m, 4.22 mL, 6.75 mmol) was added dropwise at 0 °C to a solution
of 1 (0.8 g, 2.7 mmol) in THF (25 mL). After 30 min, a suspension of
SnCl2 (1.02 g, 5.4 mmol) in dry THF (15 mL) was added slowly at –
78 °C. The reaction mixture was slowly warmed to room temperature
and stirred for 16 h. After removal of all volatiles, the residue was
extracted with toluene (10 mL) to yield an orange solution of 2. Yield
0.98 g (52%), M.p. 98 °C. The product is soluble in benzene, toluene
and THF. C18H18N2Cl2O2Sn2·2THF (746.52 g·mol–1): calcd. C 41.83,
H 4.55, N 3.75%; found: C 42.54, H 5.29, N 3.89%. 1H NMR
(300 MHz, C6D6): δ = 7.23 (m, 6 H, H-3 and H-2), 2.20 (s, 12 H, H-
1). 119Sn NMR (112.07 MHz, C6D6): δ = –147 ppm. MS [EI, m/z (%)]
= 701 [M+– 3 CH3 (4)], 533[M+–2Cl, - 2THF (2.5)], 415 [M+–2Cl–
Sn–2THF (8)]. IR (KBr): ν˜ = 2958 (C–H), 1614 (C=O), 1091 (C–O)
cm–1.
Crystal Data for 1: Mr = 296.37, orthorhombic, space group Pcab, a
= 10.016(7) Å, b = 11.773(7) Å, c = 26.129(15) Å, α = 90°, β =
99.142(2)°, γ = 90°, V = 3081(3) Å3, Z = 2, ρ calcd. = 1.278 g·cm–3,
R(reflections) = 0.0735(2699), wR2(reflections) = 0.1774(10119).
Crystal Data for cis-Oxamide 2: Mr = 746.83, monoclinic, space
group P21/n, a = 8.0473(3) Å, b = 11.6507(4) Å, c = 30.9617(11) Å,
α = 90°, β = 93.0780(10)°, γ = 90°, V = 2898.68(18) Å3, Z = 4, ρ
calcd. = 1.711 g·cm–3, R(reflections) = 0.0226(5990), wR2(reflections)
= 0.0236(24134).
Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for the structures in
this paper have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic
Data Centre, CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB21EZ, UK. Copies
of the data can be obtained free of charge on quoting the depository
numbers CCDC-804037 for 1 and CCDC-803607 for cis-3 (Fax: +44-
m.ac.uk).
Note: After the work-up, the trans-3 solution was stored in a freezer
at –20 °C for 2 weeks to afford yellow crystals of tin cis-oxamide 3
complex (0.31 g, 15.5%). IR (KBr): ν˜ = 2958 (C–H), 1614.21 (C=O)
and 1568 (C=O), 1095 (C–O) cm–1.
Synthesis of Complex 4: The procedure was similar to the synthesis
of the oxamide 3. Yield 0.88 g (52%), M.p. 190 °C.
C26H34N2Cl2O2Sn2·2THF (858.6 g·mol–1): calcd. C 47.55, H 5.82, N
3.26%; found: C 47.35, H 5.70, N 3.59%. 1H NMR (300 MHz, C6D6):
δ = 7.23 (m, 6 H), 3.60 (sept, iPr, 4 H), 1.25 (s, CH3, 24 H) ppm.
119Sn NMR (112.07 MHz, C6D6): δ = –146.05 ppm. MS [EI, m/z (%)]
= 757 [M+–Cl, (1)], 647 [M+–2Cl, (1)], 525.3 [M+–2Cl-Sn], (36)].
Theoretical Calculations: All structures were fully optimized at the
BP86/def2-SVP level using the Gaussian 03 suite of programs. Every
stationary point was characterized as a local minimum on the potential
energy surface (PES) by a harmonic (frequency) analysis. Zero-point
vibrational energies and thermal corrections to enthalpy were also
computed at the unscaled BP86/def2-SVP level. The dispersion were
included using the implementation of Grimme’s DFT-D method for
calculating dispersion corrections for DFT functionals.[26]
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this article):
Selected bond lengths and angles and details of the X-ray crystallo-
graphic analysis for 1 and cis-3. 1H, 13C, 119Sn NMR spectra for li-
gands and tin(II) complexes.
Synthesis of N,N’-2,6-Dimethylphenyl-oxamide (1): A 250 mL two-
neck-flask containing a solution of oxalyl chloride (1.74 mL, 20 mmol)
in dry THF (30 mL) in a nitrogen atmosphere was cooled in an ice
bath, and a solution 2,6-dimethylaniline of (4.9 mL, 40 mmol) in THF
(40 mL) was slowly added with a dropping funnel. This equipment
was connected to a saturated NaOH solution for the release of HCl. A
white precipitate immediately formed and after 1 h the temperature
raised to room temperature and the resulting solid was recovered by
filtration, washed with H2O (10 mL) and dried overnight in air and
finally in vacuo. Compound 1 was recrystallized from Et2O/THF to
give suitable single crystals for X-ray diffraction study. Yield 5.07 g
(85%), M.p. 235–237 °C. C18H20N2O2 (296.37 g·mol–1): calcd. C
72.95, H 6.80, N 9.45%; found: C 72.71, H 7.26, N 9.41%. 1H NMR
(270 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.89 (s, 2 H, H-2), 7.15 (m, 6 H, H-5 and H-
6), 2.27 (s, 12 H, H-7) ppm. 13C NMR (67.93 MHz, CDCl3): δ =
158.17 (C1), 132.38 (C3), 135.07 (C4), 128.4 (C5 and C6), 18.54 (C7)
ppm. TOF-MS: [M+] C18H20N2O2: 297.1598 a.m.u, found: 297.1597
a.m.u (Error = –0.0545 ppm). IR (KBr): ν˜ = 3294 (N–H), 2962-
(C–H), 1665 (C=O), 1497 (C–N), 1220 (C–O), 1039, 802, 672 cm–1.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by CONACYT (grant 82605). H. V. R. D.
thanks the Robert Welch Foundation (grant Y-1289) for the financial
support. We thank Prof. Dr. Herbert Roesky for his valuable comments
during the preparation of this manuscript. M. I.-R. thanks for a scholar-
ship from CONACYT. We also thank Sylvain Bernès and Daniel
Muñoz-George for performing the X-ray diffraction of 1 and comments
on mathematical calculations respectively.
References
[1] T. L. Nguyen, F. W. Fowler, J. W. Lauher, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 11057–11064.
[2] R. Bernini, A. Cutolo, A. Irace, P. Spirito, L. Zeni, P. K. Jadhav,
M. Hon-Wah, Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 1153–1164.
[3] H. Ojima, K. Nonoyama, Coord. Chem. Rev. 1988, 92, 85–277.
[4] a) F. A. Cotton, C. Y. Liu, C. A. Murrillo, D. Villagran, X. Wang,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13564–13575; b) F. A. Cotton, C. Y.
Liu, C. A. Murrillo, Q. Zhao, Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 2604–2611.
Synthesis of N,N’-2,6-Diisopropylphenyl-oxamide (2): The pro-
cedure was similar to the synthesis of oxamide 1. Yield 7.59 g (93%),
M.p. 301 °C. C26H36N2O2 (408.52 g·mol–1): calcd. C 76.43, H 8.88, N
4
© 0000 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 0000, 0–0