Table 1. Examination of Double Sialylation of GalN-Gal Ac-
ceptor
Figure 1. GalN-Gal acceptors used in this study.
donor 9, which was promoted by N-iodosuccinimide (NIS)
and trifluororomethanesulfonic acid (TfOH) in nitrile
solvent.14 The results of glycosylation are summarized in
Table 1. In the case of triol acceptor 10, doubly sialylated
products were generated as a complex mixture of tetra-
saccharides 13 including stereoisomers and their 100,
40-lactonated derivatives in about 25% yield, accompa-
nied by 60-sialyl GalN-Gal as an anomeric mixture (59%)
(entry 1). Glycosylation of 40-benzylated acceptor 11 with
sialyl donor 9 did not produce tetrasaccharide 14 at all
(entry 2), again giving an anomeric mixture of 60-sialyl
GalN-Gals as the main products in 90% yield (R/β=2.5/1).
In contrast, an alternative GalN-Gal acceptor 12 bearing
an azido group at the C2 position of the GalN residue
provided a good yield (59%) of disialylated product 15 as a
mixture of stereoisomers (entry 3). The mixture consisted
of the desired R(2,3)/R(2,6)-disialyl product (41%) and
other stereoisomers (18%), namely, β(2,3)/R(2,6)-disialyl
(7%), R(2,3)/β(2,6)-disialyl (9%), and β(2,3)/β(2,6)-disia-
lyl isomers (2%) (R(2,3)/β(2,3) = 5.5:1; R(2,6)/β(2,6) =
4.3:1). As expected, all isomers were clearly separated on
TLC with different Rf values (ΔRf = 0.1ꢀ0.4), which
facilitated chromatographic separation of each isomer.15
This result indicated an important technical advantage in
the use of the N-Troc-sialyl donor for accomplishing the
synthesis of highly sialylated glycans. The anomeric con-
figuration of the newly formed glycosides was determined
on the basis of previous reports16 by measuring the long-
range 3JC‑1, H‑3ax coupling constants.
a The ratio of R:β was calculated on the basis of the isolated yield
unless otherwise specified. b Yield of the mixture of stereoisomers and
their lactonated derivatives, which were inseparable. c Yield of the
inseparable mixture of stereoisomers. The ratio of R:β could not be
estimated from the 1H NMR spectrum because of its complexity.
whereas at least one coupling constant of the other pro-
ducts was less than 1.0 Hz. Although we examined double-
sialylation using the N-acetylglycolyl sialyl donor 16,13,17
the disialylated product was obtained in poor yield (10%)
as a mixture of anomers, which were hardly separated by
column chromatography, owing to the same mobility of
each anomer on the silica gel15 (entry 4).
Scheme 3 shows the final part of the synthesis of target
molecule 2. To combine the tetrasaccharide part with a
glucose residue, tetrasaccharide 15 (R-isomer) was con-
verted into a suitable glycosyl donor. First, we screened
various reaction conditions for transforming the azido
group into an acetamide group in the presence of the Troc
group ((i) TMSCl, AcCl;18 (ii) Lindler catalyst; (iii) mod-
ified Staudinger reactions19). For compound 15, Stauding-
er reaction using Me2PPh, HOOBt, and acetic anhydride
For the main product (R(2,6)/R(2,3)-disialyl GalN-Gal)
in entry 3, the coupling constants were 6.3 and 6.0 Hz,
(14) (a) Veeneman, G. H.; van Leeuwen, S. H.; van Boom, J. H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 1331–1334. (b) Konradsson, P.; Udodong,
U. E.; Fraser-Reid, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 4313–4316.
(c) Hasegawa, A.; Nagahama, T.; Ohki, H.; Hotta, K.; Ishida, H.; Kiso,
M. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1991, 10, 493–498.
(15) For a detailed TLC profile of compounds 15 and 17, see Figure 1
in the Supporting Information.
(16) (a) Haverkamp, J.; Spoormaker, T.; Dorland, L.; Vliegenthart,
J. F. G.; Schauer, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 4851–4853. (b) Hori,
H.; Nakajima, T.; Nishida, Y.; Ohrui, H.; Meguro, H. Tetrahedron Lett.
1988, 29, 6317–6320. (c) Prytulla, S.; Lauterwein, J.; Klessinger, M.;
Thiem, J. Carbohydr. Res. 1991, 215, 345–349.
(17) Reports on glycosylation with N-glycolyl sialic acid donor:
(a) Hasegawa, A.; Uchimura, A.; Ishida, H.; Kiso, M. Biosci. Biotech.
Biochem. 1995, 59, 1091–1094. (b) Sugata, T.; Higuchi, R. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1996, 37, 2613–2614. (c) Sherman, A. A.; Yudina, O. N.; Shashkov,
A. S.; Menshov, V. M.; Nifantiev, N. E. Carbohydr. Res. 2002, 337, 451–
457. (d) Ikeda, K.; Miyamoto, K.; Sato, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48,
7431–7435. (e) Schroven, A.; Meinke, S.; Ziegelmuller, P.; Thiem, J.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2007, 13, 9012–9021. (f) Crich, D.; Wu, B. Org. Lett.
2008, 10, 4033–4035. (g) Hanashima, S.; Tomiya, T.; Ishikawa, D.; Akai,
S.; Sato, K.-I. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 959–965.
(18) Barua, A.; Bez, G.; Barua, N. C. Synlett 1999, 553–554.
(19) (a) Saxon, E.; Armstrong, J. I.; Bertozzi, C. R. Org. Lett. 2000, 2,
€
2141–2143. (b) David, O.; Meester, W. J. N.; Bieraugel, H.; Schoemaker,
H. E.; Hiemstra, H.; van Maarseveen, J. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003,
42, 4373–4375.
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX
C