Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 2012, 000, 1–6
Antitubercular Activity of New Unsymmetrical Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine Derivatives
5
liquid. The Schiff’s base obtained (8a–8e) was dissolved in dry
MeOH (15 mL) and NaBH4 (3.0 equiv) was added and progress of
the reaction was monitored by TLC. After 3 h the solvent was
removed and the product was extracted with CHCl3 (3 ꢂ 15 mL).
The reduced product was purified by column chromatography
using CHCl3–MeOH as eluent to obtain compounds 9a–9e in
good yield.
RSIC, CDRI, Lucknow for mass. The authors are also thankful to Prof. Anil K.
Tyagi, University of Delhi for access to the BSL-3 facility.
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
[1] G. L. Armstrong, L. A. Conn, R. W. Pinner, JAMA 1999, 281,
61–66.
General procedure for the preparation of compounds
10a–10e [38]
[2] Beena, D. S. Rawat, Med. Res. Rev. DOI: 10.1002/med.21262
An aqueous solution of H3PO4 (35%, 0.2 mL) was added to a
solution of the corresponding aminocarbamate (9a–9e)
(200 mg, 1.0 equiv) in CH2Cl2 (3 mL) and the reaction was stirred
for 4 h (Scheme 1). Water (4 mL) was added to the reaction
mixture, and the aqueous layer was washed with CH2Cl2
(3 ꢂ 10 mL), neutralized with NaOH solution and extracted with
CH2Cl2 (3 ꢂ 15 mL). The combined basic organic layer was
washed with brine solution (10 mL), dried over Na2SO4 and
evaporated under reduced pressure to yield the corresponding
amines (10a–10e) in good yield.
[3] K. Takayama, J. O. Kilburn, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1989,
33, 1493–1499.
[4] L. Deng, K. N. Mikus Ova, K. G. Robuck, M. Scherman, P. J.
Brennan, M. R. Mcneil, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1995, 39,
694–701.
[5] M. Protopopova, C. Hanrahan, B. Nikonenko, R. Samala,
P. Chen, J. Gearhart, L. Einck, C. A. Nacy, J. Antimicrob.
Chemother. 2005, 56, 968–974.
[6] P. Chen, J. Gearhart, M. Protopopova, L. Einck, C. A. Nacy,
Antimicrob. Chemother. 2006, 58, 332–337.
General procedure for the preparation of compounds 11–15
To a solution of the amine 10a–10e (200 mg, 1 equiv) in anhy-
drous methanol (5 mL), the corresponding aromatic aldehyde
(1.1 equiv) was added under nitrogen atmosphere and the reac-
tion mixture was stirred for 3–4 h at room temperature
(Scheme 1). To the reaction mixture sodium borohydride (2.0
equiv) was added. After 2–3 h, the solvent was evaporated and
water was added to the reaction mixture and extracted with
CHCl3 (3 ꢂ 15 mL). The combined organic layer was dried over
sodium sulfate and the solvent was removed under pressure.
Purification by column chromatography using MeOH–CHCl3 as
eluent yielded pure amine derivatives which were then con-
verted to their respective hydrochloride salts (11–15) by passing
dry HCl gas to their solution in CHCl3.
[7] K. Tahlan, R. Wilson, D. B. Kastrinsky, K. Arora, V. Nair,
E. Fischer, S. W. Barnes, J. R. Walker, D. Alland, C. E. Barry,
III, H. I. Boshoff, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 1797–
1809.
[8] M. Noji, K. Okamoto, Y. Kidani, J. Med. Chem. 1981, 24, 508–
515.
[9] E. N. Jacobsen, W. Zhang, A. R. Muci, J. R. Ecker, L. Deng,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7063–7064.
[10] D. E. Bergbreiter, C. Hobbs, C. Hongfa, J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76,
523–533.
[11] J. Melendez, M. North, P. Villuendas, Chem. Commun. 2009, 18,
2577–2579.
[12] L. Alakonda, M. Periasamy, J. Organometallic Chem. 2009, 694,
3859–3863.
In vitro assay for M. tb
[13] A. Galeano, M. R. Berger, B. K. Keppler, Cancer Chemother.
Pharmacol. 1992, 30, 131–138.
A stock culture of M. tb H37Rv (ATCC 27294) was grown to
Abs600nm 0.2 in Middlebrook 7H9 broth (Difco) supplemented
with 0.05% Tween 80, 0.2% glycerol, and albumin/NaCl/glucose
(ADS) complex. The culture was diluted 1:1000 in 7H9-based
medium before aliquoting 50 mL into each well of a 96-well
plate. Drugs were dissolved in DMSO (Sigma) to make stock
solutions of 50 mM. Drugs (100 mL solution) were added to
the first row of the 96-well plate at a final concentration
100 mM. Twofold serial dilutions were made and five dilutions
of each drug (50–3.125 mM) were tested for antimycobacterial
activity. The drugs were diluted 1:1 by addition of 50 mL of
1:1000 diluted cultures. Rows 6 and 12 of the 96-well plates were
no-drug controls. The plates were incubated at 378C and the
MIC99 values were read macroscopically using an inverted
plate reader after 14 days. Each measurement was made three
independent times.
[14] Y. Kidani, M. Noji, T. Tashiro, Gann 1980, 71, 637–643.
[15] K. Suzumori, Y. Yasui, H. Asai, Y. Yagami, Cancer Chemother.
1986, 13, 280–285.
[16] M. Gent, P. A. Knowlson, F. J. Rime, Lancet 1969, 2, 1094–
1096.
[17] J. Egberts, P. Fontijne, K. Wamsteker, Biol. Neonate 1976, 29,
315–322.
[18] Y. Kidani, K. Inagaki, M. Iigo, A. Hoshi, K. Kuretani, J. Med.
Chem. 1978, 21, 1315–1318.
[19] J. M. Grange, N. J. C. Snell, J. Ethnopharmacol. 1996, 50,
49–53.
[20] J. H. Langlands, Lancet 1970, 1, 448–450.
[21] J. Liu, X. Chen, Y. Hu, G. Cheng, D. Zhong, J. Pharmaceut.
Biomed. Anal. 2010, 51, 1134–1141.
[22] K. J. Wiessmann, K. Niemeyer, Arzneimittelforschung 1978, 28,
918–921.
DSR thanks the Department of Science and Technology (SR/S1/OC-08/2008),
New Delhi, India, and University Grant Commission, Delhi, India for
financial support. Beena, SJ, and NK are thankful to CSIR for the award
of senior research fellowships. RS acknowledges the financial support
provided by the Department of Biotechnology, India. The authors are
thankful to CIF-USIC, University of Delhi, Delhi for NMR spectral data,
[23] M. Sharma, P. Joshi, N. Kumar, S. Joshi, R. K. Rohilla, M. Roy,
D. S. Rawat, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 46, 480–487.
[24] D. S. Rawat, M. Sharma, N. Roy, R. K. Rohilla, Indian Patent
Application No: 1462/DEL, 2008.
ß 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.archpharm.com