Antioxidant activities of thiosemicarbazones from substituted benzaldehydes and N-(tetra-O-acetyl-β-d-galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazide

Article abstract of DOI:10.1016/j.ejmech.2012.10.004

Reaction of N-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-β-d-galactopyranosyl) thiosemicarbazide and different substituted benzaldehydes gave some new substituted benzaldehyde N-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-β-d-galactopyranosyl) thiosemicarbazones. The reaction was performed usi

Full text of DOI:10.1016/j.ejmech.2012.10.004

European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 60 (2013) 199e207
Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ejmech
Original article
Antioxidant activities of thiosemicarbazones from substituted benzaldehydes and
N-(tetra-O-acetyl-
b- -galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazide
D
,
a
b
Dinh Thanh Nguyen a , The Hoai Le , Thi Thu Trang Bui
*
a Faculty of Chemistry, VNU University of Science, Ha Noi 10000, Viet Nam
b Hanoi University of Agriculture, Ha Noi, Viet Nam
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Reaction of N-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-
benzaldehydes gave some new substituted benzaldehyde N-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-
b
-
D
-galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazide and different substituted
-galactopyr-
Received 13 July 2012
Received in revised form
1 October 2012
Accepted 4 October 2012
Available online 11 October 2012
b-D
anosyl)thiosemicarbazones. The reaction was performed using conventional and microwave-assisted
heating methods. The structures of thiosemicarbazones were confirmed by spectroscopic (IR, 1H NMR,
13C NMR and ESI-MS) method. The antioxidant activity of these thiosemicarbazones was evaluated
in vitro and in vivo, and it’s shown that some of these compounds had significant antioxidant activity.
Amongst the compounds screened for antioxidant activity, thiosemicarbazones 4a, 4b and 4c showed
good antioxidant activity on DPPH. The compounds 4g, 4i, 4l caused significant elevation of SOD activity
and 4e, 4g, 4i, 4l had higher catalase activity, and only compounds 4c and 4f expressed the GSH-Px
activity.
Keywords:
Antioxidant activity
D
-Galactose
Microwave-assisted synthesis
Thiosemicarbazide
Thiosemicarbazones
Crown Copyright Ó 2012 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
[29]. On the other hand these molecules can also serve as
phosphane-free multidentate ligands for transition-metal catalysis,
Monosaccharides and disaccharides, which contain sulfur, such
as isothiocyanates, thioureas, thiosemicarbazides, are versatile
precursors in organic synthesis in carbohydrate chemistry [1,2]. On
the another hand, thiosemicarbazones, which have NHeC(]S)
NH]C bond, are a class of compounds that have been evaluated
over the last 50 years as antivirals and as anticancer therapeutics
[3]. The chemistry of thiosemicarbazide derivatives of saccharides
is interested because these derivatives could be as versatile inter-
mediates for preparing various (e.g., heterocyclic) derivatives as
well [4,5] as be used for making complexes formation of metallic
ions [6e15]. Thiosemicarbazones exhibit various biological activi-
ties such as antituberculosis [16,17], antimicrobial [11,18e20], anti-
inflammatory [21], anticonvulsant [11,22], antihypertensive [23],
local anesthetic [24], anticancer [12,27], hypoglycemic [28], and
cytotoxic activities [11], also antioxidant agents [13,29].
and they are efficient ligands for palladium-catalyzed coupling
reactions in air [15]. In the past some papers have been published for
the synthesis of aldehyde/ketone N-(per-O-acetylated glycopyr-
anosyl)thiosemicarbazones [4,5,20,29e32]. The main synthetic
step for the synthesis of these molecules is being the reaction of
N-(per-O-acetylglycosyl)thiosemicarbazides with the correspond-
ing carbonyl compounds. The synthesis of thiosemicarbazones of
aromatic carbonyl compounds containing monosaccharide and
disaccharide (such as glucose, galactose, lactose and maltose) is the
main researches in our lab. Continuing our studied on the synthesis
and the reactivity of per-O-acetyl-
and N-(per-O-acetyl- -glycopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazides [31,32],
D-glycopyranosyl isothiocyanate
D
we have reported herein a systematic study for the synthesis and
spectral characterization of a series of substituted benzaldehyde
N-(tetra-O-acetyl-b-D-galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazones using
A number of glycosylthiosemicarbazide and thiosemicarbazones
derivatives showed significant in vivo anti-microorganisms and
in vitro antioxidant activity [4,22,25,26], which could be used as
leads for the development of effective anti-atherosclerotic agents
microwave-assisted method [33].
2. Results and discussion
2.1. Chemistry
The transformation reaction of tetra-O-acetyl-b-D-glucopyr-
anosyl isothiocyanate into corresponding thiosemicarbazide could
* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ84 04 3826 1853; fax: þ84 04 3824 1140.
E-mail address: nguyendinhthanh@hus.edu.vn (D.T. Nguyen).
0223-5234/$ e see front matter Crown Copyright Ó 2012 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2012.10.004

200
D.T. Nguyen et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 60 (2013) 199e207
Table 1
be carried out in different solvents, usually aprotic ones, such as
dioxane [34], dichloromethane [29], but a protic one could be used,
such as absolute ethanol, so the reaction must be performed at low
temperature (<10 ꢀC) to prevent the decomposition of iso-
thiocyanate derivative [35]. We realized that the use of dichloro-
methane as solvent in this reaction is of great advantage to work out
the reaction, due to low boiling point of that solvent. For improve-
ment in this reaction, we have used an 85% solution of hydrazine
solution instead of 100% hydrazine hydrate [29]. In this work, N-
Synthetic conditions for compounds 4aem.
Compd
R
Microwave-assisted method
Conventional method
Reaction
time,
min
Ethanol
solvent,
mL
Yield,
%
Reaction Ethanol Yield,
time,
min
solvent,
mL
%
4a
4b
4-NMe2
3-OEte4-
OH
3-OMee4-
OH
7
7
3
3
74
80
90
20
64
4c
7
7
3
3
70
75
(tetra-O-acetyl-b-D-galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazide was synt-
hesized from corresponding isothiocyanate derivative by reaction
with hydrazine hydrate (Scheme 1) by similar method. After reac-
tion, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure to obtain
a syrup residue, sometimes a solid one could be gotten. The tritu-
ration of residue with 96% ethanol to give product N-(tetra-O-acetyl-
4d
3-OHe4-
OMe
4e
4f
4g
4h
4i
4j
4k
4l
3-OMe
4-OH
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
85
75
75
60
98
98
73
70
97
4-iPr
4-Me
4-Br
4-Cl
4-F
3-NO2
4-NO2
b
-
D
-galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazide due to its low solubility in
this solvent.
Condensation reaction of N-(tetra-O-acetyl-b-D-galactopyr-
90
20
32
90
90
20
20
60
48
anosyl)thiosemicarbazide 2 with a number of substituted benzal-
dehydes 3aem lead to form a series of benzaldehyde N-(tetra-O-
4m
acetyl-b-D-galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazones 4aem (Scheme 1).
The reaction was performed by using microwave-assisted heating
and conventional heating methods. The microwave-assisted
synthetic pathway was carried out using minimum amount of
solvent (ethanol) and deceased reaction time comparing conven-
tional heating pathway (2e3 mL volume versus 20 mL, and 2e
7 min versus 90 min, respectively). Reaction time was from 2 to
7 min depending on substituent’s nature: withdrawing substitu-
ents need shorter reaction time than donating ones. When reaction
was starting to irradiate about 1e3 min, the pasty mixture of
reagents in methanol was dissolved and the reaction became
homogenous. Finally, the solid product appeared and precipitated
out. The products yields of microwave-assisted method were fairly
high from 60 to 98%, while ones of conventional heating methods
were lower, from 32 to 64%. In some cases with benzaldehydes
having 4-Cl, 4-NO2 and 4-Br groups the yields attained 98%. These
compounds can dissolved in ethanol toluene, chloroform, N,N-
dimethylformamide, and have high melting points (Table 1). The
synthesized products were characterized by IR, 1H NMR and 13C
NMR spectral data.
1744, 1261e1216 and 1055e1045 cmꢁ1 (ester), 1370e1378 cmꢁ1
(C]S), and 1625e1587 cmꢁ1 (CH]N bond). The anomeric proton
H-1 is represented as a triplet at
d
¼ 5.90e5.95 ppm due to the
coupling with both H-400 and H-200 protons in the 1H NMR spectra of
4aem. The coupling constant values, JH-1, H-2 ¼ 9.0e9.5 Hz, for the
pyranose ring agreed with trans-axial HeH disposition and
confirmed the
Signals of NH protons of the thiourea component in compounds
4aem appeared at
¼ 12.17e11.71 ppm (in singlet) for H-2 and
¼ 9.00e8.43 ppm (in doublet, JNH, ¼ 9.5e8.5 Hz) for H-4.
b-anomeric configuration of compounds 4aem.
d
d
H-1
Proton of azomethine bond had chemical shift at
7.98 ppm in singlet. Other protons in pyranose ring had signals in
d
¼ 8.22e
region of 5.93e4.03 ppm. Protons in benzene ring appeared at
d
¼ 8.27e6.73 ppm. The 13C NMR spectra showed the thiocarbonyl
carbon atom with chemical shift at
d
¼ 178.84e177.25 ppm. Carbon
atom of azomethine bond showed chemical shift at
142.56 ppm. Carbon atoms of benzene and pyranose rings had
signals at ¼ 81.94e61.10 ppm, respectively.
¼ 159.58e111.11 and
Acetate ester in sugar component had signals at
¼ 20.51e20.26
¼ 170.53e169.24 ppm for carbon atoms in methyl and
d
¼ 159.70e
d
d
The IR spectra of compounds 4aem showed characteristic
d
absorptions in the range of 3354e3313 cmꢁ1 (NeH bond), 1752e
and
d
OAc
AcO
OAc
AcO
AcO
O
O
90% NH2NH2.H2O
NCS
AcO
NH
CNHNH2
S
CH2Cl2
OAc
OAc
1
2
R
abs. EtOH,
O
C
H
CH3COOH catalyst
Heating on water bath
or Microwave
3a-m
Irradiation
OAc
AcO
O
R
NHC NHN
C
H
AcO
OAc
S
4a-m
Scheme 1. The synthesis route for preparation of the title compounds 4aem.

D.T. Nguyen et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 60 (2013) 199e207
201
carbonyl groups, respectively. Protons in methyl group of acetate
ester had chemical shifts at
¼ 2.16e1.93 ppm.
d
2.2. Study on anti-oxidant activity
The in vitro method of the scavenging of the stable DPPH radical
is extensively used to evaluate antioxidant activities in less time
than other methods [36e39]. DPPH is a stable free radical molecule
that can accept an electron or hydrogen radical and thus be con-
verted into a stable, diamagnetic molecule. DPPH has an odd
electron and so has a strong absorption band at 518 nm. When this
electron becomes paired off, the absorption decreases stoichio-
metrically with respect to the number of electrons taken up. Such
a change in the absorbance produced in this reaction has been
widely applied to test the capacity of numerous molecules to act as
free radical scavengers. The scavenging effect of the synthesized
compounds 4aem on the DPPH radical was evaluated according to
the methods of Shimada et al. [37], Leong and Shui [38] and Braca
et al. [39]. Antioxidant activity of synthesized compounds by DPPH
method were shown in Table 2 and Fig. 1.
The reaction mechanism of thiosemicarbazones 4aem with
DPPH radical was suggested at Scheme 2. In the DPPH radical
scavenging effect assay, when the concentration of thio-
semicarbazones 4 was higher than that of DPPH radical, the
quantity of these thiosemicarbazones 4aem was enough to
consume the DPPH radical and the stoichiometry of this reaction
was 1:1 shown in Scheme 2, Eq. (I). The reaction of the DPPH radical
may be based either on a charge transfer with tested compounds
perhaps initiated by DPPH radical [Eq. (I)] or on a combination of
the DPPH radical with thiosemicarbazone radical formed during
the DPPH radical scavenging assay [Eq. (II)]. A reaction of DPPH
molecules with each other is not possible due to their steric
hindrance [40].
The scavenging activity of compounds 4aem are perhaps due to
the presence of an NeH group in the thiosemicarbazone moiety,
which can donate a hydrogen atom to the DPPH radical. After
donating a hydrogen atom, compounds 4aem exist in a radical
form, and the radical could delocalize to the benzene ring to
produce the stable resonance hybrid shown in Scheme 2. The
electron conjugation in the structure stabilizes the radical, pre-
venting it from participating in a destructive biochemical reaction.
Amongst the compounds screened for antioxidant activity, 4a, 4b,
4c and 4f showed good antioxidant activity on DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-
1-picrylhydrazyl radical, DPPHꢂ). The compounds with substituents
such as 4-NMe2 (4a), 3-OEt-4-OH (4b), 3-OMe-4-OH (4c) and 4-OH
Fig. 1. DPPH radical scavenging capacity (%) of compounds 4aem at different
concentrations (mM). Resveratrol was used as a reference.
(4f) showed very good antioxidant activity on this radical.
Remained compounds do not show any antioxidant activity
comparing with resveratrol (Table 2, Figs. 2 and 3).
When the concentration of the tested compounds was lower
than that of DPPH radical, the residual DPPH radical might combine
with the resulting thiosemicarbazones radical 4 shown in Scheme
2, Eq. (II), and the stoichiometry of this reaction seemed to be
higher than 1:1 in some case. Besides that, thiosemicarbazones
with substituents such as 4-NMe2 (4a), 3-OEt-4-OH (4b), 3-OMe-4-
OH (4c) and 4-OH (4f) behaved the stronger DPPH radical scav-
enging activity than remain others. The reason of this phenomena
is that the electron resonance effect of substituted benzene ring in
radical 4a, 4b, 4c and 4f making the radical more stable in the
presence of electron-donating groups. The result of DPPH radical
scavenging activity of all compounds 4aem was summarized by
IC50 shown in Table 2.
Compounds 4aem was tested in vivo for their anti-oxidant
activities and the results are shown in Table 3. These compounds,
when administered i.p., with a dry weight equivalent dosage of
100 mg/kg/day of total extract for seven consecutive days in the
CCl4-intoxicated rats, was shown to cause a significant elevation of
free radical scavenging enzyme activities such as superoxide dis-
mutases, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase. Superoxide dis-
mutase (SOD, EC 1.15.1.1) are enzymes that catalyze the dismutation
of superoxide into oxygen and hydrogen peroxide [41]. Thus, they
are an important antioxidant defense in nearly all cells exposed to
Table 2
Antioxidant activity of synthesized compounds by DPPH method.
Compound
Scavenging effect for DPPH (%)
IC50 (mM)
Concentration (
12.5
mM)
25
50
100
200
300
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
4f
4g
4h
4i
4j
4k
4l
14.32 ꢃ 2.23
14.16 ꢃ 3.21
9.45 ꢃ 2.15
8.16 ꢃ 1.18
7.34 ꢃ 1.34
11.45 ꢃ 3.54
2.17 ꢃ 1.32
7.21 ꢃ 1.31
5.38 ꢃ 1.43
7.15 ꢃ 1.55
8.51 ꢃ 1.42
7.05 ꢃ 1.50
6.11 ꢃ 1.93
9.13 ꢃ 1.59
30.86 ꢃ 2.54
30.24 ꢃ 3.41
27.11 ꢃ 2.59
17.43 ꢃ 1.34
11.46 ꢃ 1.55
22.61 ꢃ 3.78
5.32 ꢃ 1.53
12.76 ꢃ 1.56
9.04 ꢃ 1.85
10.09 ꢃ 1.78
13.32 ꢃ 1.67
13.74 ꢃ 1.58
11.32 ꢃ 1.75
22.56 ꢃ 1.95
48.94 ꢃ 2.75
45.38 ꢃ 3.73
45.64 ꢃ 2.34
28.21 ꢃ 1.23
15.63 ꢃ 1.23
33.27 ꢃ 3.65
9.65 ꢃ 1.48
68.17 ꢃ 2.66
59.42 ꢃ 3.85
60.30 ꢃ 2.74
40.09 ꢃ 1.51
27.17 ꢃ 1.34
49.18 ꢃ 3.62
15.09 ꢃ 1.56
32.84 ꢃ 1.78
23.51 ꢃ 1.60
19.82 ꢃ 1.83
34.34 ꢃ 1.63
26.29 ꢃ 1.57
29.08 ꢃ 1.89
54.03 ꢃ 1.65
74.54 ꢃ 2.43
68.34 ꢃ 3.23
71.23 ꢃ 2.65
56.80 ꢃ 1.45
34.02 ꢃ 1.45
68.74 ꢃ 3.67
18.13 ꢃ 1.24
53.27 ꢃ 1.67
35.42 ꢃ 1.49
38.37 ꢃ 1.78
55.63 ꢃ 1.59
38.31 ꢃ 1.49
53.30 ꢃ 1.80
70.44 ꢃ 1.55
78.47 ꢃ 2.55
69.16 ꢃ 3.34
74.05 ꢃ 2.62
69.61 ꢃ 1.51
55.07 ꢃ 1.48
75.08 ꢃ 3.71
24.48 ꢃ 1.43
65.03 ꢃ 1.63
44.31 ꢃ 1.42
55.42 ꢃ 1.72
67.19 ꢃ 1.54
51.24 ꢃ 1.41
64.46 ꢃ 1.81
75.62 ꢃ 1.49
56
71
75
182
276
108
>300
206
>300
270
197
283
210
94
18.06 ꢃ 1.82
17.46 ꢃ 1.51
17.61 ꢃ 1.73
17.08 ꢃ 1.55
19.63 ꢃ 1.62
18.47 ꢃ 1.87
33.84 ꢃ 1.79
4m
Resveratrol

202
D.T. Nguyen et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 60 (2013) 199e207
H
R
R
♦
DPPH♦
TOAcGal NHCN
N
C
H
TOAcGal NH C N
N
C
H
+
(I)
S
S
4a-m
DPPH H
4a-m
radical form
+
R
R
♦
♦
TOAcGal NH C
S
N
N
C
H
TOAcGal NH C N
S
N
C
H
♦
4a-m
radical form
radical hydbrid (R )
(II)
R♦
DPPH♦
R
DPPH
+
Scheme 2. Reaction of compounds 4aem with DPPH radical.
oxygen. Catalase is a common enzyme found in nearly all living
organisms exposed to oxygen and catalyzes the decomposition of
hydrogen peroxide to water and oxygen. Catalase has one of the
highest turnover numbers of all enzymes; one catalase molecule
can convert millions of molecules of hydrogen peroxide to water
and oxygen each second [42]. Antioxidative enzyme glutathione
peroxidase (GSH-Px, EC 1.11.1.9) is the general name of an enzyme
family with peroxidase activity whose main biological role is to
protect the organism from oxidative damage [43]. The biochemical
function of glutathione peroxidase is to reduce lipid hydroperox-
ides to their corresponding alcohols and to reduce free hydrogen
peroxide to water. As shown in Table 3 and Fig. 4, some of the
compounds 4aem caused significant elevation of SOD activity.
Compounds 4g, 4i, 4l caused significant elevation of SOD activity
and 4e, 4g, 4i, 4l had higher catalase activity. But as showed in
Table 3, the SOD activity of 4a, 4b and 4c treated groups showed the
lower activity. It can be explained that the compounds of 4a, 4b and
4c could protect the CCl4 in toxicated rats from oxidant injury but
not cause significant elevation of SOD activity. The GSH-Px activity
of these compounds had some little picture: almost compounds
expressed negligible GSH-Px activity, except compound 4c (R ¼ 3-
OMee4-OH) and 4f (4-OH).
conventional heating and microwave-assisted heating method. The
antioxidant activity of these thiosemicarbazones was evaluated,
in vitro and in vivo, and it’s shown that some of these compounds
had significant antioxidant activity.
4. Experimental section
All solvents, chemicals, and reagents were obtained commer-
cially and used without purification. Melting points were deter-
mined by open capillary method on STUART SMP3 instrument
(BIBBY STERILIN, UK) and are uncorrected. IR spectra (KBr disc)
were recorded on an Impact 410 FT-IR Spectrometer (Nicolet, USA).
1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Avance Spec-
trometer AV500 (Bruker, Germany) at 500.13 MHz and 125.77 MHz,
respectively, using DMSO-d6 as solvent and TMS as an internal
standard. Chemical shifts, d, are given in parts per million (ppm),
and spin multiplicities are given as s (singlet), br s (broad singlet),
d (doublet), t (triplet), q (quartet) or m (multiplet). Coupling
constants, J, are expressed in hertz (Hz). ESI-MS spectra were
recorded on mass spectrometer LC-MS LTQ Orbitrap XL (Thermo-
Scientific, USA) in methanol, using ESI method. The entire micro-
wave heating experiments were conducted under reaction
conditions of power and temperature in reflux-heating conditions.
Thin-layer chromatography was performed on silica gel pates
60F254 No. 5715 (Merck, Germany) with EtOAc and light petroleum
(bp 60e90 ꢀC) or toluene, and spots were visualized with UV light
3. Conclusion
In conclusion, a series of substituted benzaldehyde N-(2,3,4,6-
tetra-O-acetyl-
b
-D
-galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazones
have
or iodine vapor. 2,3,4,6-Tetra-O-acetyl-
b-D-galactopyranosyl iso-
been synthesized from N-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-
b-D-galactopyr-
thiocyanate 1 was prepared by the reaction of tetra-O-acetylated-
b
-
anosyl)thiosemicarbazide and substituted benzaldehydes using
D-galactopyranosyl bromide, which was prepared from D-galactose,
80
100
4-NO2
3-NO2
4-F
4-Cl
4-Me
4-iPr
80
60
40
20
0
60
4-OH
3-OMe
3-OMe-4-OH
3-OH-4-OME
3-OEt-4-OH
4-NMe2
40
4-Br
Resveratrol (Control)
20
0
Resveratrol (Control)
0
100
200
300
400
0
100
200
300
400
Concentration, μM
Concentration,μM
Fig. 2. Scavenging activity of compound 4aee on DPPH radical.
Fig. 3. Scavenging activity of compound 4fem on DPPH radical.

D.T. Nguyen et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 60 (2013) 199e207
203
Table 3
mixture was cooled to room temperature, the colorless crystals
were filtered with suction. The crude product was recrystallized
from 95% ethanol or 70% ethanol to afford the title compounds of
Effect of compounds 4aem on the liver cytosolic sod, the liver cytosolic GSH-Px, the
liver cytosolic catalase activities and the hepatic MDA production.
Compound
SOD
(unit/mg
protein)
GHS-Px
(unit/mg
protein)
Catalase
(unit/mg
protein)
benzaldehyde N-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-
b-D-galactopyranosyl)thi-
osemicarbazones 4aem. The physical and spectral (IR, 1H NMR, 13
C
NMR and ESI-MS) data are in good agreement with their structures.
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
4f
4g
4h
4i
4j
4k
4l
5.81 ꢃ 0.53
6.45 ꢃ 0.47
6.57 ꢃ 0.44
8.76 ꢃ 0.63
8.89 ꢃ 0.29
8.24 ꢃ 0.60
9.92 ꢃ 0.69
8.82 ꢃ 0.39
9.95 ꢃ 0.72
8.91 ꢃ 0.69
8.60 ꢃ 0.51
9.01 ꢃ 0.53
8.79 ꢃ 0.52
7.49 ꢃ 0.45
5.42 ꢃ 0.29
0.71 ꢃ 0.02
0.69 ꢃ 0.02
0.37 ꢃ 0.04
0.59 ꢃ 0.03
0.71 ꢃ 0.01
0.51 ꢃ 0.02
1.01 ꢃ 0.01
0.72 ꢃ 0.02
0.98 ꢃ 0.01
0.70 ꢃ 0.01
0.69 ꢃ 0.01
0.73 ꢃ 0.01
0.71 ꢃ 0.02
0.35 ꢃ 0.02
0.27 ꢃ 0.01
295.32 ꢃ 10.32
283.53 ꢃ 12.43
289.56 ꢃ 13.34
351.61 ꢃ 11.71
362.23 ꢃ 11.47
331.56 ꢃ 10.53
390.73 ꢃ 12.62
354.13 ꢃ 11.43
389.25 ꢃ 12.12
358.47 ꢃ 12.33
350.63 ꢃ 12.13
360.61 ꢃ 11.73
352.45 ꢃ 12.25
285.32 ꢃ 10.26
218.25 ꢃ 11.43
4.2.2.1. Synthesis of 4-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde N-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-
acetyl-b-D-galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazone (4a). White solid, mp
217e218 ꢀC (from 96% ethanol); ½a 2D5
ꢁ97 (c 2.0, CHCl3); IR (KBr,
ꢄ
cmꢁ1):
n 3343 (NH), 1744 (C]O), 1600 (CH]N), 1223, 1055 (CeOeC);
1H NMR (DMSO-d6)
d
(ppm): 8.43 (d,1H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-400),11.71 (s,1H,
H-200), 7.99 (s, 1H, H imine), 5.85 (t, 1H, J ¼ 9.5 Hz, H-1), 5.26 (t, 1H,
J ¼ 10.0 Hz, H-2), 5.40 (dd, J ¼ 10.0, 3.5 Hz, H-3), 5.34 (d,1H, J ¼ 3.5 Hz,
H-4), 4.31 (t, 1H, J ¼ 6.5 Hz, H-5), 4.05 (d,1H, 6.5 Hz, H-6), 6.73 (d, 1H,
J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-20), 7.61 (d,1H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-30), 7.61 (d,1H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-
50), 6.73 (d, 1H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-60), 1.95e2.15 (s, 1H, CH3CO); 13C NMR
4m
Resveratrol
Control
(DMSO-d6)
d (ppm): 177.3 (C]S), 81.5 (C-1), 68.5 (C-2), 70.4 (C-3),
67.5 (C-4), 71.4 (C-5), 61.2 (C-6), 120.8 (C-10), 111.6 (C-20), 128.9 (C-30),
151.7 (C-40), 128.9 (C-50), 111.6 (C-60), 144.8 (C-imine), 20.3e20.5
(CH3CO), 169.2e170.1 (CH3CO), 20.4 [40-N(CH3)2]; ESI-MS m/z: 553
(M þ H, 100%), 575 (M þ Na, 64%). Anal. Calcd for C24H32N4O9S
(552.60): C, 52.16; H, 5.84; N, 10.14%. Found: C, 52.19; H, 5.88; N,
10.18%.
using the Lemieux’s procedure for D-glucose [44], with lead thio-
cyanate in dried toluene [20].
4.1. Synthesis of N-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-
b
-
D
-galactopyranosyl)
thiosemicarbazide (2)
4.2.2.2. Synthesis of 3-ethoxy-4-hydroxybenzaldehyde N-(2,3,4,6-tetra-
O-acetyl-b-D-galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazone (4b). White solid,
To a solution of 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-
b
-
D
-galactopyranosyl iso-
mp 204e205 ꢀC (from 96% ethanol); ½a 2D5
ꢁ103 (c 2.1, CHCl3); IR (KBr,
ꢄ
thiocyanate (10 mmol) in 70 mL of dichloromethane a solution of
85% hydrazine hydrate (10 mmol, 1.2 mL) in 30 mL of dichloro-
methanewas added dropwisewith stirring in 30 min at temperature
below 20 ꢀC. The temperature of solution was maintained between
15 and 20 ꢀC. The mixture was continued stirring at room temper-
ature for 2 h. The solvent then was removed under reduced pressure
to get a yellow solid [32]. The crude product was crystallized from
ethanol to yield white product. Yield 71%, mp 197e198 ꢀC; 1H NMR
cmꢁ1):
n 3345 (NH), 1747 (C]O), 1600 (CH]N), 1223,1051 (CeOeC);
1H NMR (DMSO-d6)
d
(ppm): 8.49 (d, 1H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-400), 11.84 (s,
1H, H-200), 8.01 (s,1H, H imine), 5.79 (t,1H, J ¼ 9.5 Hz, H-1), 5.26 (t,1H,
J ¼ 10.0, H-2), 5.42 (d,1H, d, J ¼ 10, 4.0 Hz, H-3), 5.35 (d,1H, J ¼ 3.5 Hz,
H-4), 4.32 (t, 1H, J ¼ 6.5 Hz, H-5), 4.04 (m, 1H, H-6), 7.43 (d, 1H,
J ¼ 1.5 Hz, H-20), 6.85 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, H-50), 7.15 (dd, 1H, J ¼ 8.0,
1.5 Hz, H-60), 1.97e2.15 (s, 1H, CH3CO); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6)
d (ppm):
177.9 (C]S), 81.6 (C-1), 68.4 (C-2), 70.3 (C-3), 67.6 (C-4), 71.4 (C-5),
61.1 (C-6), 125.0 (C-10), 122.5 (C-20), 147.2 (C-30), 149.6 (C-40), 115.5
(C-50), 111.1 (C-60), 144.4 (C-imine), 20.3e20.5 (CH3CO), 169.3e170.5
(CH3CO), 63.93 [30-OCH2CH3], 14.68 [30-OCH2CH3]; ESI-MS m/z: 570
(DMSO-d6):
d
9.32 (s br, 1H), 8.08 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.0), 5.76 (t, 1H, J ¼ 9.0),
5.35 (dd,1H, J ¼ 10.25, 3.75), 5.28 (d,1H, J ¼ 3.5), 5.09 (t,1H, J ¼ 9.75),
4.63 (s br, 2H), 4.26 (t,1H, 6.25), 4.00e3.99 (m, 2H), 2.12 (s, 3H),1.99
(s, 3H), 1.98 (s, 3H), 1.93 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6):
d 182.1, 170.1,
(M þ H, 100%), 592 (M þ Na, 87%). Anal. Calcd for C24H31N3O11
S
170.0, 169.9, 169.4, 81.2, 71.2, 70.5, 68.4, 67.6, 61.3, 20.6, 20.5, 20.4,
20.4.
(569.58): C, 50.61; H, 5.49; N, 7.38%. Found: C, 50.70; H, 5.54; N, 7.49%.
4.2.2.3. Synthesis of 3-methoxy-4-hydroxybenzaldehyde N-(2,3,4,6-
4.2. General procedure for synthesis of substituted benzaldehyde
tetra-O-acetyl-b-D-galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazone (4c). White sol-
N-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-
b
-D-galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazones
id, mp 246e247 ꢀC (from 96% ethanol); ½a 2D5
ꢄ
ꢁ87 (c 1.8, CHCl3); IR
1
(4aem)
(KBr, cmꢁ1):
n 3352 (NH), 1744 (C]O), 1601 (CH]N), 1223, 1055; H
NMR (DMSO-d6)
d
(ppm): 8.51 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, H-400), 11.85 (s, 1H, H-
4.2.1. Conventional method (for compounds 4a, 4b, 4d and 4m)
A suspension mixture of N-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl- -gluco-
200), 8.01 (s, 1H, H imine), 5.77 (t,1H, J ¼ 9.0, H-1), 5.26 (t, 1H, J ¼ 9.5 Hz,
H-2), 5.42 (dd, 1H, J ¼ 10.0, 3.5, H-3), 5.33 (d, 1H, J ¼ 3.5 Hz, H-4), 4.31
(t, 1H, J ¼ 6.5 Hz, H-5), 4.05 (m, 1H, H-6), 7.48 (d, 1H, J ¼ 1.5 Hz, H-20),
6.83 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, H-50), 7.12 (dd, J ¼ 8.0, 4.0 Hz, H-60), 1.96e2.14
b-D
pyranosyl)thiosemicarbazide 1 (4.21 g, 1 mmol) and corresponding
substituted benzaldehyde 3a, 3b, 3d or 3m (1 mmol) and glacial
acetic acid (1 mL) in ethanol (20 mL) was refluxed for 90 min. The
solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was
triturated with water, the precipitate was filtered by suction and
recrystallized from 95% ethanol or 70% ethanol to afford the title
compounds of corresponding substituted benzaldehyde N-(2,3,4,6-
(s, 1H, CH3CO); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6)
d (ppm): 177.9 (C]S), 81.5 (C-1),
68.4 (C-2), 70.3 (C-3), 67.6 (C-4), 71.4 (C-5), 61.1 (C-6), 125.1 (C-10),
109.6 (C-20), 148.1 (C-30), 149.2 (C-40), 119.3 (C-50), 122.6 (C-60), 144.3
(C-imine), 20.3e20.5 (CH3CO), 169.3e170.5 (CH3CO), 55.7 (30-OCH3);
ESI-MS m/z: 556 (M þ H, 65%), 578 (M þ Na, 100%). Anal. Calcd for
C23H29N3O11S (555.55): C, 49.72; H, 5.26; N, 7.56%. Found: C, 49.85; H,
5.38; N, 7.67%.
tetra-O-acetyl-b-D-galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazones.
4.2.2. Microwave-assisted method (for all compounds)
A suspension mixture of N-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-
b
-D
-gluco-
4.2.2.4. Synthesisof3-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehydeN-(2,3,4,6-tetra-
pyranosyl)thiosemicarbazide 1 (4.21 g, 1 mmol) and corresponding
substituted benzaldehyde 3aem (1 mmol) and glacial acetic acid
(0.05 mL) in absolute ethanol (2e5 mL) was irradiated with reflux
for 5e7 min in microwave oven. The suspension mixture became
clear solution after irradiating in 3e4 min. After reaction the
O-acetyl-b-D-galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazone (4d). White solid, mp
181e182 ꢀC (from 96% ethanol); ½a 2D5
ꢁ117 (c 2.0, CHCl3); IR (KBr,
ꢄ
cmꢁ1):
n 3313 (NH), 1744 (C]O), 1600 (CH]N), 1243, 1040 (CeOeC);
1H NMR (DMSO-d6)
d
(ppm): 8.51 (d, 1H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-400), 11.78 (s, 1H,
H-200), 7.98 (s, 1H, H imine), 5.89 (t, 1H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-1), 5.26 (t, 1H,

204
D.T. Nguyen et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 60 (2013) 199e207
Fig. 4. Effect of compounds 4aem on the liver cytosolic sod, the liver cytosolic GSH-Px, the liver cytosolic catalase activities and the hepatic MDA production.
J ¼ 9.5 Hz, H-2), 5.39 (dd, 1H, J ¼ 10.0, 4.0 Hz, H-3), 5.32 (d, 1H,
J ¼ 3.5 Hz, H-4), 4.31 (t, 1H, J ¼ 6.5 Hz, H-5), 4.04 (d, 1H, J ¼ 6.5 Hz, H-6),
7.31 (d, 1H, J ¼ 2.0 Hz, H-20), 6.96 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, H-50), 7.14 (dd, 1H,
J ¼ 8.5, 2.0 Hz, H-60), 1.93e2.15 (s, 1H, CH3CO); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6)
200), 8.08 (s, 1H, H imine), 5.82 (t, 1H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-1), 5.29 (t, 1H,
J ¼ 10.0 Hz, H-2), 5.40 (dd, 1H, J ¼ 10.0, 4.0 Hz, H-3), 5.33 (d, 1H,
J ¼ 3.5 Hz, H-4), 4.31 (t,1H, J ¼ 6.5 Hz, H-5), 4.05 (m, 1H, H-6), 7.46 (d,
1H, J ¼ 1.0 Hz, H-20), 7.34 (m, 1H, H-40), 7.34 (m, 1H, H-50), 7.01 (ddd,
1H, J ¼ 8.0, 1.4, 1.0 Hz, H-60), 1.95e2.14 (s, 1H, CH3CO); 13C NMR
d
(ppm): 177.8 (C]S), 81.7 (C-1), 68.6 (C-2), 70.5 (C-3), 67.5 (C-4), 71.6
(C-5), 61.3 (C-6), 126.5 (C-10), 120.7 (C-20), 146.7 (C-30), 150.0 (C-40),
113.3 (C-50), 111.8 (C-60), 144.5 (C-imine), 20.3e20.5 (CH3CO), 169.3e
170.0 (CH3CO), 55.69 (40-OCH3); ESI-MS m/z: 556 (M þ H, 36%), 578
(M þ Na, 100%). Anal. Calcd for C23H29N3O11S (555.55): C, 49.72; H,
5.26; N, 7.56%. Found: C, 49.87; H, 5.43; N, 7.69%.
(DMSO-d6) d (ppm): 178.4 (C]S), 81.6 (C-1), 68.5 (C-2), 70.4 (C-3),
67.5 (C-4), 71.5 (C-5), 61.2 (C-6), 135.1 (C-10), 129.8 (C-20), 159.6 (C-30),
120.8 (C-40), 111.4 (C-50), 116.6 (C-60), 143.7 (C-imine), 20.3e20.5
(CH3CO), 169.3e170.3 (CH3CO), 55.3 (s, 3H, 30-OCH3); ESI-MS m/z:
540 (M þ H, 100%), 562 (M þ Na, 83%). Anal. Calcd for C23H29N3O10
S
(539.56): C, 51.20; H, 5.42; N, 7.79%. Found: C, 51.38; H, 5.57; N, 7.97%.
4.2.2.5. Synthesis of 3-methoxybenzaldehyde N-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-
b
-
D
-galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazone (4e). White solid, mp 223e
4.2.2.6. Synthesis of 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde N-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-
224 ꢀC (from 96% ethanol); ½a 2D5
ꢄ
ꢁ96 (c 2.5, CHCl3); IR (KBr, cmꢁ1):
b-D-galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazone (4f). White solid, mp 234e
n
3348 (NH), 1745 (C]O), 1582 (CH]N), 1220, 1055 (CeOeC); 1H
235 ꢀC (from 96% ethanol); ½a 2D5
ꢁ102 (c 2.0, CHCl3); IR (KBr,
ꢄ
NMR (DMSO-d6)
d
(ppm): 8.67 (d,1H, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, H-400),11.97 (s,1H, H-
cmꢁ1):
n 3354 (NH),1752 (C]O),1608 (CH]N),1216,1039 (CeOeC);

D.T. Nguyen et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 60 (2013) 199e207
205
1H NMR (DMSO-d6)
d
(ppm): 8.53 (d, 1H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-400), 11.76 (s,
for C22H26BrN3O9S (588.43): C, 44.91; H, 4.45; N, 7.14%. Found: C,
45.09; H, 4.65; N, 7.32%.
1H, H-200), 8.01 (s, 1H, H imine), 5.86 (t, 1H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-1), 5.23
(t, 1H, J ¼ 9.5 Hz, H-2), 5.38 (dd, J ¼ 10.0, 4.0 Hz, H-3), 5.33 (d, 1H,
J ¼ 3.5 Hz, H-4), 4.30 (t, 1H, J ¼ 6.0 Hz, H-5), 4.04 (d,1H, J ¼ 7.0 Hz, H-
6), 6.82 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, H-20), 7.65 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, H-30), 7.65 (d,
1H, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, H-50), 6.82 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, H-60), 1.94e2.14 (s, 1H,
4.2.2.10. Synthesis of 4-chlorobenzaldehyde N-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-
b-D-galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazone (4j). White solid, mp 173e
174 ꢀC (from 96% ethanol); ½a 2D5
ꢄ
ꢁ112 (c 2.0, CHCl3); IR (KBr, cmꢁ1):
CH3CO); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6)
d
(ppm): 177.8 (C]S), 81.6 (C-1), 68.6
n
3325 (NH), 1754 (C]O), 1600 (CH]N), 1245, 1054 (CeOeC); 1H
(C-2), 70.5 (C-3), 67.5 (C-4), 71.5 (C-5), 61.3 (C-6), 144.3 (C-10), 129.4
(C-20), 115.7 (C-30), 124.7 (C-40), 115.7 (C-50), 129.4 (C-60), 159.7
(C-imine), 20.3e20.5 (CH3CO), 169.4e170.1 (CH3CO); ESI-MS m/z:
NMR (DMSO-d6)
d
(ppm): 8.78 (d,1H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-400),11.95 (s,1H, H-
200), 8.08 (s, 1H, H imine), 5.88 (t, 1H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-1), 5.30 (t, 1H,
J ¼ 9.5 Hz, H-2), 5.37 (dd, 1H, J ¼ 10, 3.5 Hz, H-3), 5.32 (d, 1H,
J ¼ 4.0 Hz, H-4), 4.30 (t, 1H, J ¼ 6.5 Hz, H-5), 4.04 (d, 1H, J ¼ 6.5 Hz, H-
6), 7.48 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, H-20), 7.86 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, H-30), 7.86 (d,
1H, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, H-50), 7.48 (d, 1H, 8.5 Hz, H-60), 2.02e2.15 (s, 12H,
526 (M þ H, 81%), 548 (M þ Na, 100%). Anal. Calcd for C22H27N3O10
S
(525.53): C, 50.28; H, 5.18; N, 8.00%. Found: C, 50.35; H, 5.37; N,
8.19%.
CH3CO); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6)
d (ppm): 178.5 (C]S), 81.9 (C-1), 68.7
4.2.2.7. Synthesis of 4-isopropylbenzaldehyde N-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-
(C-2), 70.7 (C-3), 67.6 (C-4), 71.7 (C-5), 61.4 (C-6), 134.9 (C-10), 128.9
(C-20), 129.4 (C-30), 132.8 (C-40), 129.4 (C-50), 128.9 (C-60), 142.7
(C-imine), 20.4e20.6 (CH3CO), 169.5e170.2 (CH3CO); ESI-MS m/z:
544/546 (M þ H, 100%/34%), 566/568 (M þ Na, 98%/39%). Anal. Calcd
for C22H26ClN3O9S (543.97): C, 48.57; H, 4.82; N, 7.72%. Found: C,
48.77; H, 5.00; N, 7.91%.
acetyl-b-D-galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazone (4g). White solid,
mp 172e173 ꢀC (from 96% ethanol); ½a 2D5
ꢁ100 (c 1.8, CHCl3); IR
ꢄ
(KBr, cmꢁ1):
n 3355 (NH), 1748 (C]O), 1608 (CH]N), 1223, 1054
(CeOeC); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6)
d
(ppm): 8.63 (d, 1H, J ¼ 9.5 Hz,
H-400), 11.92 (s, 1H, H-200), 8.10 (s, 1H, H imine), 5.87 (t, 1H, J ¼ 9.5 Hz,
H-1), 5.30 (t,1H, J ¼ 10.0 Hz, H-2), 5.41 (dd,1H, J ¼ 10.0, 3.5 Hz, H-3),
5.35 (d, 1H, J ¼ 3.5 Hz, H-4), 4.33 (t, 1H, J ¼ 6.5 Hz, H-5), 4.06 (d, 1H,
J ¼ 6.5 Hz, H-6), 7.32 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, H-20), 7.50 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz,
H-30), 7.50 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, H-50), 7.32 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, H-60),
4.2.2.11. Synthesis of 4-fluorobenzaldehyde N-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-
b-D-galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazone (4k). White solid; mp 113e
114 ꢀC (from 96% ethanol); ½a 2D5
ꢄ
ꢁ95 (c 2.0, CHCl3); IR (KBr, cmꢁ1):
1.96e2.16 (s, 1H, CH3CO); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6)
d
(ppm): 178.2 (C]
n
3341 (NH), 1606 (CH]N), 1750 (C]O), 1261, 1045 (CeOeC); 1H
S), 81.6 (C-1), 68.5 (C-2), 70.5 (C-3), 67.5 (C-4), 71.5 (C-5), 61.2 (C-6),
131.4 (C-10), 126.6 (C-20), 127.6 (C-30), 151.0 (C-40), 127.6 (C-50), 126.6
(C-60), 143.9 (C-imine), 20.3e20.5 (CH3CO), 169.3e170.0 (CH3CO),
33.3 [40-CH(CH3)2], 23.6 [40-CH(CH3)2]; ESI-MS m/z: 552 (M þ H,
88%), 574 (M þ Na, 100%). Anal. Calcd for C25H33N3O9S (525.53): C,
54.43; H, 6.03; N, 7.62%. Found: C, 54.61; H, 6.24; N, 7.81%.
NMR (DMSO-d6)
d
(ppm): 8.75 (d, 1H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-400), 11.93 (s, 1H,
H-200), 8.11 (s, 1H, H imine), 5.90 (t, 1H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-1), 5.32 (m, 1H,
H-2), 5.40 (dd,1H, J ¼ 10.0, 3.5 Hz, H-3), 5.32 (m,1H, H-4), 4.33 (t,1H,
J ¼ 6.0 Hz, H-5), 4.06 (m, 1H, H-6), 7.28 (t, 1H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-20), 7.92
(dd, 1H, J ¼ 9.0, 6.0 Hz, H-30), 7.92 (dd, 9.0, 6.0 Hz, H-50), 7.28 (t, 1H,
J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-60), 2.02e2.15 (s, 12H, CH3CO); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6)
d
(ppm): 178.4 (C]S), 81.8 (C-1), 68.6 (C-2), 70.6 (C-3), 67.5 (C-4),
4.2.2.8. Synthesis of 4-methybenzaldehyde N-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-
b
-
71.6 (C-5), 61.2 (C-6), 130.4 (C-10), 129.8 (C-20), 115.7 (C-30), 163.3
(C-40), 115.7 (C-50), 129.8 (C-60), 142.7 (C-imine), 20.3e20.5 (CH3CO),
169.3e170.0 (CH3CO); ESI-MS m/z: 528 (M þ H, 66%), 550 (M þ Na,
100%). Anal. Calcd for C22H26FN3O9S (543.97): C, 50.09; H, 4.97; N,
7.97%. Found: C, 50.18; H, 5.15; N, 7.81%.
D
-galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazone (4h). White solid, mp 180e
181 ꢀC (from 96% ethanol); ½a 2D5
ꢁ115 (c 2.0, CHCl3); IR (KBr,
ꢄ
cmꢁ1):
n 3334 (NH),1747 (C]O),1609 (CH]N),1233, 1054 (CeOeC);
1H NMR (DMSO-d6)
d
(ppm): 8.62 (d, 1H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-400), 11.85 (s,
1H, H-200), 8.06 (s, 1H, H imine), 5.85 (t, 1H, J ¼ 9.5 HZ, H-1), 5.27 (t,
1H, J ¼ 10.0 Hz, H-2), 5.36 (dd, 1H, J ¼ 9.5, 4.0 Hz, H-3), 5.31 (d, 1H,
J ¼ 3.5 Hz, H-4), 4.29 (t,1H, J ¼ 6.5 Hz, H-5), 4.03 (d, 1H, J ¼ 6.5 Hz, H-
6), 7.69 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, H-20), 7.23 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, H-30), 7.23 (d,
1H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, H-50), 7.69 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, H-60), 1.93e2.13 (s, 12H,
4.2.2.12. Synthesis of 3-nitrobenzaldehyde N-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-
b-D-galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazone (4l). Light yellow solid;
mp 169e170 ꢀC (from 96% ethanol); ½a 2D5
ꢁ98 (c 2.0, CHCl3); IR (KBr,
ꢄ
cmꢁ1):
n 3338 (NH), 1745 (C]O), 1625 (CH]N), 1228, 1054 (CeOe
CH3CO); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6)
d
(ppm): 178.2 (C]S), 81.8 (C-1), 68.6
C); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6)
d
(ppm): 8.96 (d, 1H, 1H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-400),
(C-2), 70.6 (C-3), 67.6 (C-4), 71.6 (C-5), 61.3 (C-6), 131.0 (C-10), 129.4
(C-20), 127.6 (C-30), 140.3 (C-40), 127.6 (C-50), 129.4 (C-60), 144.1
(C-imine), 20.4e21.0 (CH3CO), 169.4e170.1 (CH3CO), 18.5 (40-CH3);
ESI-MS m/z: 524 (M þ H, 100%), 546 (M þ Na, 84%). Anal. Calcd for
C23H29N3O9S (523.56): C, 52.76; H, 5.58; N, 8.03%. Found: C, 52.96; H,
5.75; N, 8.22%.
12.13 (s, 1H, 1H, H-200), 8.22 (s, 1H, 1H, H imine), 5.91 (t, 1H,
J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-1), 5.34 (m,1H,1H, H-2), 5.41 (dd,1H, J ¼ 9.5, 3.5 Hz, H-
3), 5.34 (m, 1H, 1H, H-4), 4.34 (t, 1H, J ¼ 6.5 Hz, H-5), 4.06 (m, 1H, H-
6), 8.22 (s, 1H, H-20), 8.36 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, H-40), 7.74 (t, 1H,
J ¼ 8.0 Hz, H-50), 8.26 (dd, 1H, J ¼ 8.0, 1.0 Hz, H-60), 1.96e2.00 (s, 1H,
CH3CO); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6)
d (ppm): 178.7 (C]S), 81.89 (C-1),
68.6 (C-2), 70.5 (C-3), 67.5 (C-4), 71.6 (C-5), 61.2 (C-6), 130.2 (C-10),
135.7 (C-20), 141.6 (C-30), 133.4 (C-40), 124.4 (C-50), 122.1 (C-60), 148.3
(C-imine), 20.3e20.5 (CH3CO), 169.3e170.0 (CH3CO); ESI-MS m/z:
554 (Mþ, 100%). Anal. Calcd for C22H26N4O11S (543.97): C, 47.65; H,
4.73; N, 10.10%. Found: C, 47.84; H, 4.91; N, 10.29%.
4.2.2.9. Synthesis of 4-bromobenzaldehyde N-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-
b-D-galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazone (4i). White solid, mp 159e
160 ꢀC (from 96% ethanol); ½a 2D5
ꢁ115 (c 2.0, CHCl3); IR (KBr,
ꢄ
cmꢁ1):
n 3331 (NH), 1748 (C]O), 1595 (CH]N), 1227, 1052 (CeOeC);
1H NMR (DMSO-d6)
d
(ppm): 8.77 (d, 1H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-400), 11.95 (s,
1H, H-200), 8.06 (s, 1H, H imine), 5.88 (t, 1H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-1), 5.30 (t,
1H, J ¼ 10.0 Hz, H-2), 5.37 (dd, 1H, J ¼ 10.0, 4.0 Hz, H-3), 5.31 (d, 1H,
4.5, H-4), 4.30 (t,1H, J ¼ 6.5 Hz, H-5), 4.03 (d,1H, J ¼ 6.5 Hz, H-6), 7.79
(d, 1H, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, H-20), 7.61 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, H-30), 7.61 (d, 1H,
J ¼ 8.5 Hz, H-50), 7.79 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, H-60), 1.93e2.13 (s, 12H,
4.2.2.13. Synthesis of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde N-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-
b-D-galactopyranosyl)thiosemicarbazone (4m). Light yellow solid;
mp 157e158 ꢀC (from 96% ethanol); ½a 2D5
ꢁ95 (c 2.0, CHCl3); IR (KBr,
ꢄ
cmꢁ1):
n 3337 (NH), 1744 (C]O), 1587 (CH]N), 1226, 1048 (CeOe
C); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6)
d
(ppm): 9.00 (d, 1H, 1H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-400),
CH3CO); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6)
d
(ppm): 178.4 (C]S), 81.8 (C-1), 68.6
12.17 (s, 1H, 1H, H-200), 8.20 (s, 1H, 1H, H imine), 5.93 (t, 1H,
J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-1), 5.35 (m, 1H, 1H, H-2), 5.40 (dd, 1H, J ¼ 10.0, 3.5 Hz,
H-3), 5.35 (m, 1H, 1H, H-4), 4.33 (t, 1H, J ¼ 6.5 Hz, H-5), 4.07 (d, 1H,
1H, J ¼ 6.5 Hz, H-6), 8.14 (d, 1H, 1H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-20), 8.27 (d, 1H, 1H,
J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-30), 8.27 (d, 1H, 1H, J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-50), 8.14 (d, 1H, 1H,
(C-2), 70.5 (C-3), 67.5 (C-4), 71.6 (C-5), 61.2 (C-6), 133.1 (C-10), 131.6
(C-20), 129.4 (C-30), 123.5 (C-40), 129.4 (C-50), 131.6 (C-60), 142.6
(C-imine), 20.3e20.5 (CH3CO), 169.3e169.9 (CH3CO); ESI-MS m/z:
588/590 (M þ H, 89%/78%), 610/612 (M þ Na, 100%/97%). Anal. Calcd

206
D.T. Nguyen et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 60 (2013) 199e207
J ¼ 9.0 Hz, H-60), 1.96e2.16 (s, 1H, 12H, CH3CO); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6)
activities. The protein content was measured by the method of
Lowry et al. [45] with bovine serum albumin as a standard.
d
(ppm): 178.8 (C]S), 81.9 (C-1), 68.7 (C-2), 70.6 (C-3), 67.5 (C-4),
71.7 (C-5), 61.3 (C-6), 140.2 (C-10), 123.8 (C-20), 128.5 (C-30), 141.2
(C-40), 128.5 (C-50), 123.8 (C-60), 147.9 (C-imine), 20.3e20.5 (CH3CO),
169.4e170.0 (CH3CO); ESI-MS m/z: 555 (M þ H, 72%), 577 (M þ Na,
100%). Anal. Calcd for C22H26N4O11S (543.97): C, 47.65; H, 4.73; N,
10.10%. Found: C, 47.85; H, 4.93; N, 10.27%.
4.3.4. Determination of anti-oxidant enzyme activities
SOD was assayed by the method of McCord and Fridovich [46].
The reaction mixture was make from 300
xanthine as substrate, 100 l of 0.05 mM solution of KCN, 100
solution of 1% sodium deoxycholate, 20 l of solution of xanthine
oxidase, 20 l of solution of cytosolic extract and 300 l of solution
ml of 0.5 mM solution of
m
ml of
m
4.3. Screening for antioxidant activity
m
m
of 0.1 mM cytochrome C and placed in a 1 cm cuvette and the rate of
increase in absorbance at 550 nm was recorded for 5 min. SOD
activity was expressed as unit/mg protein (Table 3).
4.3.1. Chemicals
Chrysin, dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) and diethylphosphoryl
cyanide (DEPC) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. Other
derivatizing reagents were obtained from Aldrich Chemical Co.
Sodium azide, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA),
amide adenine dinucleotide phosphate, reduced form (NADPH),
cumene hydroperoxide, glutathione reductase, DL- -tocopherol
acetate, carbon tetrachloride (CCl4), xanthine, potassium cyanide
(KCN), sodium dodecylsulfate, trichloroacetic acid (TCA), cyto-
chrome C, thiobarbituric acid, n-butanol and pyridine were
purchased from Sigma Chem. Co. All other chemicals and reagents
were analytical grade.
Catalase was assayed by the method of Rigo and Rotilio [47]. The
cytosolic extract of liver (40
0.13 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0, 500
water and 1800 l of 15 mM solution of H2O2 and thoroughly
m
l) diluted 10 times was added with
b
-nicotin-
m
l), distilled by 660 l of
m
m
a
mixed. The rate of changes in the absorbance at 240 nm for 5 min
was recorded. Catalase activity was expressed as unit/mg protein
(Table 3).
Glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity was measured by the
method of Paglia and Valentine [48]. The enzymatic reaction in the
tube that contained reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
phosphate, reduced glutathione, sodium azide and glutathione
reductase was initiated by the addition of hydrogen peroxide
(H2O2) and the change in absorbance at 340 nm was monitored by
a spectrophotometer. Activity was given in units per gram (unit/g)
protein (Table 3).
4.3.2. Screening for antioxidant activity by DPPH method
All the synthesized compounds were evaluated for antioxidant
activity and compared with standard drug (Resveratrol). The activity
was evaluated using the DPPH method [36e38]. The 150-mM solu-
tion of DPPH (195
ml) in 96% ethanol was added to standard solution
(resveratrol) and tested sample solutions (5
ml each) of different
4.3.5. Statistical analysis
concentrations (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0 and 12.0 mM) in 96% ethanol on
96-hole ELISA plates and allow to react at temperature 25 ꢀC in
incubator. After 30 min the absorbance values were measured at
518 nm and convert into the percentage antioxidant activity (AA)
using formula, AA% ¼ [(AbsDPPH ꢁ Abssample)/(AbsDPPH ꢁ Absethanol)]$
100%, where AbsDPPH was the absorbance of DPPH solution which
All data on antioxidant activities are the average of triplicate
analyses. One-way analysis of variance was performed by ANOVA
procedures. Significant differences between means were deter-
mined by Duncan’s Multiple Range tests. P values < 0.05 were
regarded as significant and P values < 0.01 were very significant
[36].
was used as a negative sample, prepared byadding 96% ethanol (5
ml)
to 195 l of 150-mM solution of DPPH in 96% ethanol, Abssample was
m
Acknowledgments
the absorbance of sample solution, Absethanol was the absorbance of
96% ethanol, which was used as a blank [38,39]. The positive controls
were those using the standard solution containing resveratrol. All
tests and analyses were undertaken on three replicates and the
results averaged. The IC50 values were calculated by linear regression
plots, where the abscissa represented the concentration of tested
compound solution (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0 and 12.0 mM) and the
ordinate the average percent of antioxidant activity from three
separate tests. The results are tabulated in Table 2.
The authors thank Vietnam’s National Foundation for Science
and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) for providing the
financial support.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data related to this article can be found at http://
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2012.10.004.
4.3.3. Anti-oxidant assay in vivo
References
Albino rats of Wistar strain, weighing 100e150 g were used in all
experiments. Animals were maintained on 12 h light/dark cycle at
approximately 22 ꢀC and allowed food and water ad libitum. Rats
were injected i.p., with a mixture of CCl4 in olive oil (1:1) at a dose of
0.6 mL/kg to induce hepatotoxicity. These animals were randomized
into four groups and seven rats each. Control animals were given the
[1] Z.J. Witczak, Monosaccharide isothiocyanates and thiocyanates: synthesis,
chemistry, and preparative applications, in: S. Tipson (Ed.), Advances in
Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, vol. 44, Academic Press, New York,
1986, pp. 91e145 (Chapter 3).
[2] J.L. Jiménez Blanco, B. Sylla, C. Ortiz-Mellet, J.M. García Fernández, J. Org.
Chem. 72 (2007) 4547e4550.
[3] D.C. Greenbaum, Z. Mackey, E. Hansell, P. Doyle, J. Gut, C.R. Caffrey, J. Lehrman,
P.J. Rosenthal, J.H. McKerrow, K. Chibale, J. Med. Chem. 47 (2004) 3212e3219.
[4] B. Yang, S.S. Zhang, H.X. Li, Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 22 (2006) 738e741.
[5] M.A.M. Alho, N.B. d’Accorso, Carbohydr. Res. 328 (2000) 481e488.
[6] M.R. Ganjali, M. Hosseini, M. Salavati-Niasari, T. Poursaberi, M. Shamsipur,
M. Javanbakht, O.R. Hashemi, Electroanalysis 14 (2002) 526e531.
[7] A.D. Naik, P.A.N. Reddy, M. Nethaji, A.R. Chakravarty, Inorg. Chim. Acta 349
(2003) 149e158.
vehicle alone. Rats were pretreated once with DL-a-tocopherol
acetate (a dose of 400 mg/kg) and test samples were given i.p. at
a dose of 100 mg/kg/day for seven consecutive days prior to the
administration of CCl4. Animals were sacrificed 24 h after CCl4
dosing and blood was collected by decapitation for the determina-
tion of serum transaminases.
Hepatic tissues were carefully excised and homogenized in cold
1.15% KCle10 mM phosphate buffer with EDTA (pH 7.4) and
centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 8 min. The supernatant was further
centrifuged at 45,000 rpm for 50 min to obtain cytosolic extract for
the measurement of liver cytosolic SOD, catalase and GSH-Px
[8] N.M. El-Metwally, I.M. Gabr, A.M. Shallaby, A.A. El-Asmy, J. Coord. Chem. 58
(2005) 1145e1149.
[9] S. Sharma,F.Athar,M.R.Maurya,A.Azam,Eur. J. Med. Chem. 40(2005)1414e1419.
[10] L.S. Sarma, J.R. Kumar, K.J. Reddy, A.V. Reddy, J. Agric. Food Chem. 53 (2005)
5492e5498.
[11] M.M. Aly, Y.A. Mohamed, K.A.M. El-Bayouki, W.M. Basyouni, S.Y. Abbas, Eur. J.
Med. Chem. 45 (2010) 3365e3373.

D.T. Nguyen et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 60 (2013) 199e207
207
[12] T.P. Stanojkovic, D. Kovala-Demertzi, A. Primikyri, I. Garcia-Santos, A. Castineiras,
Z. Juranic, M.A. Demertzis, J. Inorg. Biochem. 104 (2010) 467e476.
[13] Zeng-Chen Liu, Bao-Dui Wang, Zheng-Yin Yang, Yong Li, Dong-Dong Qin,
Tian-Rong Li, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 44 (2009) 4477e4484.
[29] S. Ghosh, A.K. Misra, G. Bhatia, M.M. Khan, A.K. Khanna, Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 19 (2009) 386e389.
[30] A.C. Tenchiu Deleanu, I.D. Kostas, D. Kovala-Demertzi, A. Terzis, Carbohydr.
Res. 344 (2009) 1352e1364.
[14] D. Kovala-Demertzi, P.N. Yadav, J. Wiecek, S. Skoulika, T. Varadinova,
M.A. Demertzis, J. Inorg. Biochem. 100 (2006) 1558e1567.
[15] I.D. Kostas, G.A. Heropoulos, D. Kovala-Demertzi, P.N. Yadav, J.P. Jasinski,
M.A. Demertzis, F.J. Andreadaki, G. Vo-Thanh, A. Petit, A. Loupy, Tetrahedron
Lett. 47 (2006) 4403e4407.
[16] D. Sriram, P. Yogeeswari, R. Thirumurugan, R.K. Pavana, J. Med. Chem. 49
(2006) 3448e3450.
[17] N.C. Desai, H.K. Shucla, B.R. Parekh, K.A. Thaker, J. Indian Chem. Soc. 61 (1984)
455e457.
[18] A.P. Liesen, T.M. Aquino, C.S. Carvalho, V.T. Lima, J.M. Araújo, J.G. Lima,
Antônio R. de Faria, Edésio J.T. de Melo, Antonio J. Alves, Elias W. Alves,
A.Q. Alves, A.J.S. Góes, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 45 (2010) 3685e3691.
[19] M.G. Mamolo, L. Vio, E. Banfi, Farmaco 51 (1996) 71e74.
[20] B.K. Garnaik, R.K. Behera, Indian J. Chem. 27B (1988) 1157e1158.
[21] L. Labanauskas, V. Kalcas, E. Udrenaite, P. Gaidelis, A. Brukstus, V. Dauksas,
Pharmazie 56 (2001) 617e619.
[31] N.D. Thanh, N.T.T. Mai, Carbohydr. Res. 344 (2009) 2399e2405.
[32] N.D. Thanh, N.T.K. Giang, L.T. Hoai, Eur. J. Chem. 7 (2010) 899e907.
[33] A. Loupy, Microwave in Organic Synthesis, second ed., vol. 1, WILEY-VCH
Verlag GmbH & Co KGaA, Weinheim, 2006, pp. 579e594.
[34] A.A. Tashpulatov, V.A. Afanas’ev, M.Yu. Lidak, N.M. Sukhova, Yu.Yu. Popelis,
I. Rakhmatullaev, Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 19 (1983) 137e141.
[35] N. Karalı, A. Gürsoy, F. Kandemirli, N. Shvets, F.B. Kaynak, S. Özbey,
V. Kovalishyn, A. Dimoglo, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 15 (2007) 5888e5904.
[36] K. Marxen, K.H. Vanselow, S. Lippemeier, R. Hintze, A. Ruser, U.-P. Hansen,
Sensors 7 (2007) 2080e2095.
[37] K. Shimada, K. FuJikawa, K. Yahara, T.J. Nakamura, Agric. Food Chem. 40
(1992) 945e948.
[38] L.P. Leong, G. Shui, Food Chem. 76 (2002) 69e75.
[39] A. Braca, C. Sortino, M. Politi, I. Morelli, J. Mendez, J. Ethnopharmacol. 79
(2002) 379e381.
[40] W. Brand-Williams, M.E. Cuvelier, C. Berset, Lebensm.-Wiss. u.-Technol. 28
(1995) 25e30.
[22] L. Somogyi, Carbohydr. Res. 75 (1979) 325e330.
[23] S. Turner, M. Myers, B. Gadie, S.A. Hale, A. Horsley, A.J. Nelson, R. Pape,
J.F. Saville, J.C. Doxey, T.L. Berridge, J. Med. Chem. 31 (1988) 906e913.
[24] G. Mazzone, R. Pignatello, S. Mazzone, A. Panico, G. Pennisi, R. Castana,
P. Mazzone, Farmaco 48 (1993) 1207e1224.
[41] J.M. McCord, I. Fridovich, Free Radic. Biol. Med. 5 (1988) 363e369.
[42] P. Chelikani, I. Fita, P.C. Loewen, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 61 (2004) 192e208.
[43] F.L. Muller, M.S. Lustgarten, Y. Jang, A. Richardson, H. van Remmen, Free Radic.
Biol. Med. 43 (2007) 477e503.
[25] E.C. Rodriguez, L.A. Marcaurelle, C.R. Bertozzi, J. Org. Chem. 63 (1998) 7134e7135.
[26] K.N. Zelenin, V.V. Alekseyev, P.B. Terentiev, O.B. Kumetsova, V.V. Lashin,
V.V. Ovcharenko, V.V. Torocheshnikov, L.A. Khorseyeva, A.A. Sorokin, Men-
deleev. Commun. 3 (1993) 168e169.
[27] J.Y. Chou, S.Y. Lai, S.L. Pan, G.M. Jow, J.W. Chern, J.H. Guh, Biochem. Pharmacol.
66 (2003) 115e124.
[44] R.L. Lemieux, Tetra-O-acetyl-b-D-glucopyranosyl bromide, in: R.L. Whistler,
M.L. Wolfom (Eds.), Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry, vol. 2, Academic
Press Inc., New York and London, 1963, pp. 221e222.
[45] O.H. Lowry, N.N. Posenbrough, A.L. Farr, R.J. Randall, J. Biol. Chem. 193 (1951)
265e275.
[46] J.M. McCord, I. Fridovich, J. Biol. Chem. 244 (1969) 6049e6055.
[47] A. Rigo, G. Rotilio, Anal. Biochem. 81 (1977) 157e166.
[48] D.E. Paglia, W.N. Valentine, J. Lab. Clin. Med. 70 (1967) 158e169.
[28] M. Hanna, M. Girges, D. Rasala, R. Gawineck, Arzneim. Forsch.-Drug. Res. 45
(1995) 1074e1078.