limiting the application of these materials. For example,
residual hydrophobic fragments may undergo aggregation
in aqueous solutions. Self-immolative dendrons that frag-
ment in response to the cleavageofa photoresponsive focal
point moiety have also been developed.17,18,24 However,
due to the inherent design of these materials they have been
limited to dendrons rather than dendrimers and are thus
far limited to a very select set of backbone monomers that
are derivatives of dihydroxybenzylalcohols.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Monomer 5 and G1 Dendron 8
Photodegradable linkages have not previously been incor-
porated throughout the backbones of dendrimers or den-
drons at each monomer unit. This approach would allow for a
rapid, simultaneous cleavage of multiple linkages through the
dendrimer backbone and is potentially applicable to various
dendrimer backbones. However, the incorporation of photo-
degradable moieties throughout the dendrimer backbone is a
significant synthetic challenge due to the requirement for
extremely clean and efficient chemistry in dendrimer synth-
esis. Despite the multitude of reports on dendrimer synthesis
over the last few decades, only a limited number of dendrimer
backbones have emerged as widely accessible synthetically,
and minor modifications to the monomer units can drama-
tically alter the synthetic process and results. We report here
the incorporation of photodegradable o-nitrobenzyl ester
moieties31,32 into the widely used 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)-
propionic acid (bis-MPA) dendrimer backbone and photo-
degradation studies of the resulting materials.
Our synthetic strategy, an adaptation of the polyester
dendrimer synthesis developed by Ihre et al.,33 involved the
divergent synthesis of first-, second-, and third-generation
(G1ꢀG3) dendrons with alkyne focal points followed by
an azide þ alkyne “click” conjugation of the dendrons
onto a trifunctional azide core to obtain the target G1ꢀG3
dendrimers. Due to the photosensitivity of the target
molecules and intermediates, all reaction flasks were pro-
tected from light using aluminum foil, but no special
measures were required during the isolation and purifica-
tion steps. 4-Bromomethyl-3-nitrobenzoic acid (1) was
used as the starting material in the synthesis (Scheme 1).
First, itwas necessarytomaskthe carboxylic acidgroup on
1 using a protecting group that would not require acidic or
basic conditions for deprotection as these conditions
would cause complications in subsequent steps of the
synthesis. Thus, an allyl ester was installed by reaction with
allyl alcohol using DCC to provide 2. Bis-MPA (3) was then
introduced in the presence of Cs2CO3 in DMF to provide 4
in quantitative yield. Finally, the principle monomer for
dendrimer growth (5) was synthesized by deprotection of
the allyl group in 4 using Pd(PPh3)4 and piperidine.
With the key monomer in hand, the next step was the
synthesis of the G1ꢀG3 dendrons. As an alkyne focal
point was desired for the eventual dendron coupling to the
core, the synthesis of the G1 dendron was carried out in a
manner similar tothatdescribedabovefor monomer5, but
using propargyl alcohol instead of allyl alcohol. This
provided first the propargyl ester derivative 6, followed
by the bis-MPA derivative 7 (Scheme 1). Another key
difference was that instead of cleaving the focal point
propargyl alcohol on 7, this was left intact and instead
the acetonide protecting group was removed using H2SO4
inMeOHtoprovidethe G1dendron 8 inhigh yield overall.
(13) Gillies, E. R.; Frechet, J. M. J. Bioconjugate Chem. 2005, 16, 361.
(14) Grayson, S. M.; Frechet, J. M. J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3171.
(15) Smet, M.; Liao, L. X.; Dehaen, W.; McGrath, D. V. Org. Lett.
2000, 2, 511.
(16) Yesilyurt, V.; Ramireddy, R.; Thayumanavan, S. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 3038.
(17) Amir, R. J.; Pessah, N.; Shamis, M.; Shabat, D. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4494.
(18) Szalai, M. L.; McGrath, D. V. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 7261.
(19) Kevwitch, R. M.; McGrath, D. V. New J. Chem. 2007, 31, 1332.
(20) Kostiainen, M. A.; Smith, D. K.; Ikkala, O. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2007, 46, 7600.
(21) Park, C.; Lim, J.; Yun, M.; Kim, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008,
47, 2959.
(22) Kostiainen, M. A.; Kasyutich, O.; Cornelissen, J.; Nolte,
R. J. M. Nature Chem. 2010, 2, 394.
(23) Kostiainen, M. A.; Kotimaa, J.; Laukkanen, M. L.; Pavan,
G. M. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 6912.
(24) Fomina, N.; McFearin, C. L.; Almutairi, A. Chem. Commun.
2012, 48, 9138.
(25) Li, S.; Szalai, M. L.; Kevwitch, R. M.; McGrath, D. V. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10516.
(26) Szalai, M. L.; Kevwitch, R. M.; McGrath, D. V. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 15688.
(27) Shamis, M.; Lode, H. N.; Shabat, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 1726.
(28) Haba, K.; Popkov, M.; Shamis, M.; Lerner, R. A.; Barbas, C. F.;
Shabat, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 716.
(29) Ong, W.; McCarley, R. L. Chem. Commun. 2005, 4699.
(30) Ong, W.; McCarley, R. L. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 7295.
(31) Reichmanis, E.; Smith, B. C.; Gooden, R. J. Polym. Sci., Part A:
Polym. Chem. 1985, 23, 1.
(32) Zhao, H.; Sterner, E. S.; Coughlin, E. B.; Theato, P. Macro-
molecules 2012, 45, 1723.
(33) Ihre, H.; Hult, A.; Frechet, J. M. J.; Gitsov, I. Macromolecules
1998, 31, 4061.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 8, 2013
1831