stereospecifically, a new quaternary center adjacent to
the sulfur atom.6 Carbolithiation provides a connective
alternative to deprotonation for the formation of
organolithiums,7 and with the aim of investigating the
hitherto unexplored carbolithiation of unsaturated thio-
carbamates,8 two series of alkenes were made by the
methods illustrated in Scheme 1. Adapting approaches to
N-alkenylureas9 or O-alkenylcarbamates10 requiring a
CdX-containing precursor was not an option, given the
offensiveness of thioketones,11 so an alternative route was
developed. Cinnamyl alcohols 1 were treated with thiocar-
bonyldiimidazole (TCDI, 2) to form an adduct which
underwent immediate [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement to
3. Methylation of the remaining imidazole and substitu-
tion by an N-methylaniline gave the thiocarbamates 4.12
These were converted into the two classes of S-alkenyl
thiocarbamates either by base-promoted isomerization to
the trisubstituted alkenes 513 or by oxidative cleavage and
reduction to give 6 followed by elimination to the disub-
stituted alkenes 7.14 The trisubstituted alkenes 5 were
formed as an inseparable mixture of E/Z isomers, in which
the Z isomer predominated (as shown by NOE).
The reactivity of S-alkenyl thiocarbamates was explored
initially with thiocarbamates 7. A series of compounds
7aÀd was first treated at À78 °C in THF with a range of
organolithiums (Scheme 2). The results are reported in
Table 1. Treatment of thiocarbamate 7aÀc with n-BuLi,
s-BuLi, PhLi, and MeLi led to the formation of the
corresponding rearranged products 9 (entries 1, 3, 4, 6,
8À12). The reaction in these cases presumably proceeds by
initial attack of the alkyllithium on the β-position of the
Scheme 1. Synthesis of S-Alkenyl-N-aryl Thiocarbamates
vinylthiocarbamate, resulting in the formation of an
intermediate organolithium 8Li by carbolithiation. The
known6 N to C aryl migration ensues, giving the rear-
ranged thiocarbamate anion 9Li and hence, after low
temperature protonation,15 the tertiary thiocarbamate 9.
Rearrangement wasnot seenwith7ausing i-PrLi orwith
t-BuLi as nucleophiles. In the first case the carbolithiation
took place to give 8b in low yield and was accompanied by
amide byproducts arising from attack of i-PrLi on the
carbonyl group of the thiocarbamate. With t-BuLi, the
carbolithiation was high yielding, and on quenching the
unrearranged addition product 8e was obtained, presum-
ably because steric hindrance at the C R to S is too great to
allow intramolecular attackon the aromatic ring16 (though
rearrangement does take place with 7b). Yields from 7c
were low, probably because of the poor reactivity of the
electron-rich tolyl ring toward attack by the benzyllithium.
With the 2,6-dimethylated ring of 7d, unsurprisingly,
carbolithiation (giving 8l) but not rearrangement was
observed, even with n-BuLi (entry 13).17
(6) Clayden, J.; MacLellan, P. Chem. Commun. 2011, 3395.
(7) (a) Klein, S.; Marek, I.; Poisson, J.-F.; Normant, J.-F. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8853. (b) Norsikian, S.; Marek, I.; Poisson, J.-F.;
Normant, J.-F. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 4898. (c) Wei, X.; Taylor, R. J. K.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 665. (d) Norsikian, S.; Marek, I.;
Normant, J. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 7523. (e) Norsikian, S.;
Marek, I.; Klein, S.; Poisson, J.-F.; Normant, J.-F. Chem.;Eur. J. 1999,
5, 2055. (f) Norsikian, S.; Baudry, M.; Normant, J.-F. Tetrahedron Lett.
2000, 41, 6575. (g) Hogan, A.-M. L.; O’Shea, D. F. J. Org. Chem. 2008,
73, 2503.
Rearrangements of the carbolithiation products of 5
were slower than those from 7 (Scheme 3). In an initial
study (Table 2, entry 1), 5a was treated with n-BuLi
at À78 °C for 2 h. The carbolithiation product 10a was
formed in high yield, but no traces of rearranged 11a were
detected (entry 1). Although the starting material 5a was a
mixture of 7:1 Z/E isomers, the product 10a was formed as
a 4:1 mixture of diastereoisomers 10a and epi-10a suggest-
ing that the intermediate organolithium 10Li may undergo
(8) Related unsaturated ureas and carbamates undergo carbo-
lithiation: N-vinyl carbamates: (a) Gericke, R.; Harting, J.; Lues,
I.; Schittenhelm, C. J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 3074. (b) Lepifre, F.;
Cottineau, B.; Mousset, D.; Bouyssou, P.; Coudert, G. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2004, 45, 483. (c) Cottineau, B.; Gillaizeau, I.; Farard, J.;
Auclair, M. L.; Coudert, G. Synlett 2007, 1925. O-Vinyl carbamates:
€
(d) Peters, J. G.; Seppi, M.; Frohlich, R.; Wibbeling, B.; Hoppe, D.
Synthesis 2002, 3, 381. (e) Superchi, S.; Sotomayor, N.; Miao, G.;
Joseph, B.; Campbell, M. G.; Snieckus, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37,
6061. (f) Fournier, A. M.; Clayden, J. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 142. N-Vinyl
ureas: (g) Clayden, J.; Donnard, M.; Lefranc, J.; Minassi, A.; Tetlow,
D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 6624. (h) Tait, M.; Donnard, M.;
Minassi, A.; Lefranc, J.; Bechi, B.; Carbone, G.; O’Brien, P.; Clayden, J.
Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 34. (i) Lefranc, J.; Minassi, A.; Clayden, J. Beilstein
J. Org. Chem. 2013, 6, 628.
(15) Propionic acid remains liquid even at low temperature, avoiding
lack of reproducibility associated with the warming caused by freezing of
for example acetic acid. Warming the reaction mixture before this
acidifation leads to hydrolysis of the thiocarbamate: see later.
(16) The related vinylurea behaves similarly with t-BuLi: see ref 8a
(17) 2,6-Dimethylphenyl rings do however rearrange in lithiated
ureas: Clayden, J.; Dufour, J.; Grainger, D.; Helliwell, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 129, 7488.
(18) Although we could not unequivocally assign the relative config-
uration of 10 or 11, we assume, in line with precedent (ref 6, 8g) that the
carbolithiation proceeds with syn stereospecificity, that the resulting
organolithiums are (in general) configurationally stable on the time scale
of the reactions, and that both protonation and aryl migration are
retentive.
ꢀ
(9) Lefranc, J.; Tetlow, D. J.; Donnard, M.; Minassi, A.; Galvez, E.;
Clayden, J. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 296.
(10) Fournier, A. M.; Nichols, C. J.; Vincent, M. A.; Hillier, I. H.;
Clayden, J. Chem.;Eur. J. 2012, 18, 16478.
(11) Voss, J. J. Sulfur Chem. 2009, 30, 167.
(12) For a more general method developed recently, see: Mingat, G.;
Clayden, J. Synthesis 2012, 2723.
(13) An attempted isomerization using a ruthenium hydride catalyst
(see ref 9) failed.
(14) We have since developed a more efficient route to thiocarba-
mates 7: Castagnolo, D.; Luisi, R.; Clayden, J. Manuscript in
preparation.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 9, 2013
2117