highly desired. In 1995, Eilbracht and co-workers reported
the transition-metal-catalyzed olefin isomerization/allyl
Claisen rearrangement/intramolecular hydroacylation cas-
cade of di(allyl) ether A to produce substituted cyclopenta-
none D by using a neutral Rh(I)/dppe or Ru(II)/PPh3
complex (Scheme 1).5a In this cascade reaction, the metal-
catalyzed chemoselective olefin isomerization of the mono-
substituted alkene moiety of A proceeds to give alkenyl
ether B. Subsequent thermal allyl Claisen rearrangement
affords 4-alkenal C. Metal-catalyzed intramolecular hydro-
acylation of C affords cyclopentanone D. However, harsh
reaction conditions (140À220 °C under CO atmosphere)
were required and the yields of D were not satisfactory.
On the other hand, our research group reported the
cationic Rh(I)/bisphosphine complex-catalyzed olefin iso-
merization/propargyl Claisen rearrangement/carbonyl mi-
gration cascade of allyl propargyl ethers possessing the 1,
1-disubstituted alkene moiety at 80 °C.6 In this cascade
reaction, the olefin isomerization of the 1,1-disubstituted
alkene moiety proceeds smoothly. Thus, we designed the
following Rh(I)-catalyzed cascade reaction using di(allyl)
ether 1 possessing the 1,1- and 1,2-disubstituted alkene
moieties (Scheme 2). If the cationic Rh(I)/bisphosphine
complex catalyzes the chemoselective isomerization of the
1,1-disubstituted alkene moiety of 1, the corresponding
alkenyl ether 2 would be generated.7 The subsequent
thermal allyl Claisen rearrangement of 2, which would be
accelerated by the Lewis acidic cationic Rh(I) complex,
would proceed at a lower temperature to afford 4-alkenal 3.8
The Rh(I)-catalyzed intramolecular hydroacylation of 3
would afford cyclopentanone 4. Herein, we disclose our
successoftheabove-mentioned cascadereactionby usinga
cationic Rh(I)/dppf catalyst under mild conditions.
Scheme 2
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditionsa
We first investigated the reaction of di(allyl) ether 1a in
the presence of a cationic Rh(I)/dppe complex (10 mol %)
at 80 °C (Table 1, entry 1). Pleasingly, the desired cyclo-
pentanone 4a was obtained in moderate yield, while
3-alkenal 5a was generated as a byproduct. Screening of
bisphosphine ligands (entries 1À5) revealed that the use of
(5) (a) Eilbracht, P.; Gersmeir, A.; Lennartz, D.; Huber, T. Synthesis
1995, 330. For examples of the transition-metal-catalyzed allyl Claisen
rearrangement/intramolecular hydroacylation cascade, see: (b) Sattelkau,
T.; Eilbracht, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 1905. (c) Dygutsch, D. P.;
Eilbracht, P. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 5461.
a [Rh(cod)2]BF4 (0.010 mmol), ligand (0.010 mmol), 1a (0.10 mmol),
and (CH2Cl)2 (1.5 mL) were used. b Isolated yield. c [Rh(nbd)2]BF4 was
used. d NMR yield. e [Rh(cod)2]BF4 (0.015 mmol), ligand (0.015 mmol),
1a (0.30 mmol), and (CH2Cl)2 (1.5 mL) were used.
(6) Tanaka, K.; Okazaki, E.; Shibata, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009,
131, 10822.
(7) For a recent review of the transition-metal-catalyzed olefin iso-
merization, see: Tanaka, K. In Comprehensive Organometallic Chemis-
try III; Crabtree, R. H., Mingos, D. M. P., Ojima, I., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford,
2007; Vol. 10, p 71.
dppf afforded 4a in the highest yield without the formation
of 5a (entry 5). At rt, the chemoselective isomerization of
the 1,1-disubstituted alkene moiety of 1a proceeded to give
the corresponding alkenyl ether 2a without forming dienes E
and F, while 4-alkenal 3a was generated in low yield and
cyclopentanone 4a was not generated at all (entry 6). Finally,
the catalyst loading could be reduced to 5 mol % without
erosion of the product yield and ee value (entry 7).
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, the
scope of this cascade reaction was examined (Table 2).9
With respect to substituents at the 1,2-disubstituted alkene
moiety (R1), di(allyl) ethers 1aÀh possessing electronically
(8) For recent examples of the sequential olefin isomerization/allyl
Claisen rearrangement of di(allyl) ethers, see: (a) McLaughlin, M. G.;
Cook, M. J. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 2058. (b) Geherty, M. E.; Dura,
R. D.; Nelson, S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 11875. (c) Kerrigan,
N. J.; Bungard, C. J.; Nelson, S. G. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 6863. (d)
Wang, K.; Bungard, C. J.; Nelson, S. G. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2325. (e)
Stevens, B. D.; Bungard, C. J.; Nelson, S. G. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71,
6397. (f) Trost, B. M.; Zhang, T. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 6007. (g) Nelson,
S. G.; Wang, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 4232. (h) Nevado, C.;
Echavarren, A. M. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 9735. (i) Schmidt, B. Synlett
2004, 1541. (j) Nelson, S. G.; Bungard, C. J.; Wang, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 13000. (k) Le Notre, J.; Brissieux, L.; Semeril, D.; Bruneau,
C.; Dixneuf, P. H. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1772. (l) Ben Ammar, H.; Le
Notre, J.; Salem, M.; Kaddachi, M. T.; Dixneuf, P. H. J. Organomet.
Chem. 2002, 662, 63 and references therein.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX