1816
J. Yang et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23 (2013) 1813–1816
propofol disodium phosphate esters and propofol amino acid ester
derivatives10,11 (Fig. 8). These prodrugs were unable to meet clini-
cal requirements due to their slow propofol release rate. If the pro-
pofol release was not rapid enough, the anesthetic dosage had to
be increased, which inevitably led to an accumulation of the anes-
thetic. Thus, the main advantages of propofol, including the rapid
recovery, would be lost. As a drug development project, we con-
sider it a failure.
of the rat and the concentration of 4-hydroxybutyraten (GHB) in
the rat body fluid when 400–800 mg/kg of 4-hydroxybutyric acid
was administered.17 The release of 4-hydroxybutyric acid was only
24 mg/kg when administered with the two-fold of ED50 for
HX0969w in the rat, which was much lower than the dose of 4-
hydroxybutyric acid for the sleep-inducing effect on the rat re-
ported in the literature; therefore, we have believed that the by-
product of HX0969W used for anesthesia has no toxicity or a lower
toxicity.
The main reason for the slow release of propofol from the pro-
drugs obtained by the modification of the phenolic hydroxyl group
is the slow hydrolysis rate of the pro-moiety due to the steric hin-
drance with two ortho-isopropyl groups. When dynamic force is
strong enough to promote decomposition of the prodrug, the pro-
pofol release rate would become rapid. For example, when
GPI15715 was decomposed to a hemiacetal, the unstability of the
intermediate would become a strong dynamic force to induce the
rapid propofol release. HX0969 can produce anesthesia in the SD
rat by a rapid release of propofol. Since the primary hydroxyl group
of HX0969 is not severely hindered, a variety of second pro-moie-
ties such as phosphate and amino acid ester can be attached to in-
crease the water-solubility of HX0969. Such pro-moieties can be
smoothly hydrolyzed by enzymes in vivo to generate HX0969,
which is quickly converted to propofol probably via lactonization.
The breakdown product of HX0969 is butyrolactone in theory,
which will be converted to 4-hydroxybutyric acid within a short
period of time in vivo, as an endogenous substance in mammals,
4-hydroxybutyric acid has a low toxicity and can be metabolized
into the Krebs cycle.12,13 There has been no report about the acute
toxicity of butyrolactone injected through the rat tail vein. How-
ever, there has been a report about the effect of butyrolactone on
the local cerebral glucose utilization in the rat after its tail vein
injection, but no significant changes were found in the rat behavior
in the 75 or 150 mg/kg dose group.14 Additionally, there has been a
report about the effect of butyrolactone on the activity of the rat
after the administration of butyrolactone 100 or 200 mg/kg, but
no toxicity was reported.15 The release of butyrolactone was only
20 mg/kg when administered with the two-fold of ED50 for
HX0969w in the rat, which was much lower than the dose of buty-
rolactone reported in the literature; therefore, we speculated that
butyrolactone released from HX0969w might not cause any signif-
icant toxicity. Butyrolactone will be transformed to 4-hydroxy-bu-
tyric acid in a short time in vivo, the latter is a clinically used drug.
A report showed that an intravenous administration of 4-hydroxy-
butyric acid sodium 200 mg/kg induced sleep in the rat.16 Another
report was focused on the relationship between the sleep duration
HX0969 was found to be sensitive to the plasma but no quick
decomposition was detected in the emulsion or the aqueous etha-
nol solutions without enzymes (Supplementary data). But the ex-
act kinds of enzymes that decompose HX0969 or HX0969W
remain to be established.
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by a Grant from the 973 program (No.
2005CB522601), Beijing, China.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. Baker, M. T.; Naguib, M. Anesthesiology 2005, 103, 860.
2. Sebel, P. S.; Lowdon, J. D. Anesthesiology 1989, 71, 260.
3. Picard, P.; Tramèr, M. R. Anesth. Analg. 2000, 90, 963.
4. Schywalsky, M.; Ihmsen, H.; Tzabazis, A.; Fechner, J.; Burak, E.; Vornov, J.;
Schwilden, H. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2003, 20, 182.
5. Gomes, Paula; Vale, Nuno; Moreira, Rui Molecules 2007, 12, 2484.
6. Palmer, R. B. Toxicol. Rev. 2004, 23, 21.
7. Hwndler Sheldon, S.; Sanchez Robert, A.; Zielinski, Jan. U.S. Patent 6,254,853,
2001.
8. Bhaskar Kanth, J. V.; Mariappan, P. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 5964.
9. Altabev, N.; Snith, R. D.; Suratwala, S. I. Chem. Ind. 1973, 331.
10. Banaszczyk, M. G.; Carlo, A. T.; Millan, V.; Lindsey, A.; Moss, R.; Carlo, D. J.;
Hendler, S. S. Anesth. Analg. 2002, 95, 1285.
11. Gallop, M. A.; Xu, F.; Cundy, K. C.; Sasikumar, V.; Woiwode, T. W. U.S. Patent
20,050,004,381, 2005.
12. Waszkielewicz, A.; Bojarski, J. Pol. J. Pharmacol. 2004, 56, 43.
13. Doherty, J. D.; Roth, R. H. J. Neurochem. 1978, 30, 1305.
14. Wolfson, L. I.; Sakurada, O.; Sokoloff, L. J. Neurochem. 1977, 29, 777.
15. Hampel, H.; Hapke, H. J. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. Ther. 1968, 171, 306.
16. Depoortere, H.; Rousseau, A.; Jalfre, M. Rev. Electroencephalogr. Neurophysiol.
Clin. 1977, 7, 153 [Article in French].
17. Roiko, S. A.; Felmlee, M. A.; Morris, M. E. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2012, 40, 212.