ChemComm
Communication
azidolysine residue of the trifunctional tag will be left behind
on a target protein. Modifications that have a large size and
undergo fragmentation in tandem MS experiments are unde-
sired for the identification of probe-labelled tryptic peptides.
Hence, this secret trypsin site may aid in future identification
of the modification sites of probes and post-translational
modifications.
In conclusion, we have synthesized and analyzed five differ-
ent cleavable trifunctional biotin tags for tandem labelling of
proteins and subsequent detection or enrichment. Overall, the
trifunctional tags containing a diol or Dde linker were the most
efficient in the chemical release experiments. The Dde group
represents to our knowledge a novel cleavable linker in protein
enrichment strategies. This linker can be easily synthesized and
cleaved under mild conditions. Moreover, after tryptic diges-
tion, only a small residual modification results. We expect this
linker to find application in proteomics experiments aimed at
the identification of modification sites. Further studies along
these lines will be reported in due course.
Fig. 4 Evaluation of the elution of alkyne-E-64 targets from streptavidin beads
with the cleavable trifunctional tags. Left lane: direct release by boiling with SDS
sample buffer (D). Middle lane: chemical cleavage (cc). (1) 1 mM NaIO4, 100 mM
phosphate, pH 7.4, 3 Â 20 min. (2) 200 mM Na2S2O4, 100 mM phosphate, pH 7.4,
3 Â 20 min. (3) 100 mM NH2OH and 100 mM aniline 100 mM phosphate, pH 4.6,
4 h. (4) 0.5 M DTT in H2O, 1 h. (5) 0.05% SDS, 200 mM Tris, pH 8.5, 2 h. Right lane:
(D after cc), boiling the streptavidin beads with SDS sample buffer after chemical
release to elute unreleased proteins.
Funding was provided by the DFG (Emmy Noether program
to SV), the Chinese Scholarship Council (fellowship to YY), the
Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich and the Graduate
Unfortunately,
a further increase in the concentration of
¨
Centre Weihenstephan of the Technische Universitat Mu¨nchen.
hydroxylamine did not lead to full release (Fig. S3, ESI†). This is
in accordance with recent experiments by Claessen et al., who
reported poor elution of targets enriched from a whole proteome
using a similar bisaryl hydrazone linker.17 The disulfide linker is a
widely used and commercially available linker, which can be
cleaved by reducing agents. However, one problem of a disulfide
linker is the potential disulfide exchange. This has been reported
before in the labelling of biomolecules by clickable disulfide
cleavable linkers.20 We indeed observed a high degree of disulfide
exchange when analysing samples in non-reducing gels (Fig. S4,
ESI†). The cleavage efficiency was only moderately effective with
60% after treatment with 0.5 M DTT (Fig. 4).
Besides the four above-mentioned cleavable linkers, which
have previously been applied in the capture and release of
proteins, we designed a linker based on the Dde protecting
group (5, Fig. 2). The conventional way of deprotecting the Dde
group in peptide synthesis consists of using 2% hydrazine. This
turned out to be not compatible with fluorescent scanning
(Fig. S5a, ESI†). However, the protein targets were released and
visualized almost quantitatively (92%) with a solution of 0.05%
SDS and 200 mM Tris at pH 8.5 (Fig. 4). Both reagents are
necessary for efficient cleavage. Other mild conditions did not
lead to the release of target proteins (Fig. S5b, ESI†), whereas
other linkers are unaffected by the Tris-SDS treatment (Fig S5c,
ESI†), indicating that the release is dependent on the presence
of the Dde linker. LC-MS analysis showed that linker 5 treated
Notes and references
1 U. Haedke, E. V. Kuttler, O. Vosyka, Y. Yang and S. H. L. Verhelst,
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2013, 17, 102–109.
2 W. P. Heal and E. W. Tate, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8, 731–738.
3 B. F. Cravatt, A. T. Wright and J. W. Kozarich, Annu. Rev. Biochem.,
2008, 77, 383–414.
4 L. I. Willems, W. A. van der Linden, N. Li, K. Y. Li, N. Liu,
S. Hoogendoorn, G. A. van der Marel, B. I. Florea and
H. S. Overkleeft, Acc. Chem. Res., 2011, 44, 718–729.
5 C. S. Tsai, P. Y. Liu, H. Y. Yen, T. L. Hsu and C. H. Wong, Chem.
Commun., 2010, 46, 5575–5557.
6 A. F. Berry, W. P. Heal, A. K. Tarafder, T. Tolmachova, R. A. Baron,
M. C. Seabra and E. W. Tate, ChemBioChem, 2010, 11, 771–773.
7 L. Q. Ying and B. P. Branchaud, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47,
8593–8595.
8 G. Leriche, L. Chisholm and A. Wagner, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2012,
20, 571–582.
9 I. A. Nash, B. W. Bycroft and W. C. Chan, Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 37,
2625–2628.
10 Y. Yang, H. Hahne, B. Kuster and S. H. L. Verhelst, Mol.
Cell Proteomics, 2013, 12, 237–244.
11 A. Maurer, C. Zeyher, B. Amin and H. Kalbacher, J. Proteome Res.,
2013, 12, 199–207.
12 S. H. L. Verhelst, M. Fonovic and M. Bogyo, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2007, 46, 1284–1286.
13 M. Fonovic, S. H. L. Verhelst, M. T. Sorum and M. Bogyo, Mol. Cell.
Proteomics, 2007, 6, 1761–1770.
14 O. A. Battenberg, Y. Yang, S. H. L. Verhelst and S. A. Sieber, Mol.
Biosyst., 2013, 9, 343–351.
15 A. Dirksen, S. Yegneswaran and P. E. Dawson, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2010, 49, 2023–2027.
16 K. D. Park, R. Liu and H. Kohn, Chem. Biol., 2009, 16, 763–772.
with a Tris-SDS solution releases the biotin–Dde moiety by 17 J. H. Claessen, M. D. Witte, N. C. Yoder, A. Y. Zhu, E. Spooner and
H. L. Ploegh, ChemBioChem, 2013, 14, 343–352.
18 A. J. Lomant and G. Fairbanks, J. Mol. Biol., 1976, 104, 243–261.
19 H. C. Hang, J. Loureiro, E. Spooner, A. W. van der Velden, Y. M. Kim,
hydrolysis, which is likely the mechanism by which the proteins
are released (Fig. S6, ESI†). Interestingly, the cleavage of the
biotin–Dde group unmasks a ‘hidden’ trypsin cleavable bond.
As a result, the majority of the trifunctional tag is eliminated
during a tryptic digestion (Table S1 and Fig. S7, ESI†): both
the biotin and the fluorophore are released and only the
A. M. Pollington, R. Maehr, M. N. Starnbach and H. L. Ploegh, ACS
Chem. Biol., 2006, 1, 713–723.
20 J. Szychowski, A. Mahdavi, J. J. Hodas, J. D. Bagert, J. T. Ngo,
P. Landgraf, D. C. Dieterich, E. M. Schuman and D. A. Tirrell,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 18351–18360.
c
5368 Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 5366--5368
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013