Cyclic and Polymeric Structures from Zwitterions
COMMUNICATION
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by PRESTO/JST (2007–2011), Grant-in-Aid for
Young Scientists (A) (No. 23685032) from the MEXT, and Ritsumeikan
R-GIRO project (2008–2013). The authors thank Prof. Naoki Aratani,
NAIST, and Prof. Atsuhiro Osuka, Kyoto University, for ESI-TOF-MS
measurements, Dr. Takashi Nakanishi, NIMS, for SEM measurement,
Prof. Tomonori Hanasaki, Ritsumeikan University, for DSC measure-
ment, Dr. Noboru Ohta, JASRI/SPring-8, for synchrotron XRD analyses
(BL40B2), Prof. Shu Seki and Dr. Tsuneaki Sakurai, Osaka University,
for valuable discussion, the RIKEN Integrated Cluster of Clusters
(RICC) for the computer resources, and Prof. Hitoshi Tamiaki, Ritsumei-
kan University, for various measurements.
Figure 4. SEM images of a) 1 bpoly and b) 2 bpoly as precipitates prepared
À
from CH3CN (1.5 mm as initial concentrations of 1a+·BF4 and 2a+
·BF4À, respectively) on silicon substrates.
2 bpoly, and 3 bpoly showed transitions by decomposition at
137, 170, and 1808C, respectively, during heating. Synchro-
tron XRD analysis of 1 bpoly, 2 bpoly, and 3 bpoly as precipitates
and after melting showed less and no ordered organized
structures, respectively.[9]
Keywords: anions
supramolecular chemistry · zwitterions
·
cations
·
nanostructures
·
The stimuli-responsive behavior of the zwitterion-based
covalent polymers was examined. A characteristic property
[2] Selected examples of dynamic covalent polymers: a) W. G. Skene, J.-
Reutenauer, E. Buhler, P. J. Boul, S. J. Candau, J.-M. Lehn, Chem.
Imato, M. Nishihara, T. Kanehara, Y. Amamoto, A. Takahara, H.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3432–3434; b) B. W. Laursen, F. C.
Krebs, Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 1773–1783.
À
of the polymers was the fairly polarized C O bond con-
structed by nucleophilic attack of the phenoxide oxygen as a
strong base on the trityl carbon as a weak acid. Therefore,
À
the C O covalent bond had a relatively basic property, as
was observed in salts consisting of weak acids and strong
bases. In fact, even though 1 bpoly as a precipitate was stable
in CD3CN, treatment of 1 bpoly with CD2Cl2 as a solvent in
the absence of water also gave cationic species, presumably
due to degradation of CD2Cl2 by the basic polymers. In this
case, the counteranionic species could not be identified pre-
cisely. On the other hand, the presence of water prevented
such transformation in the polymers.[10] Therefore, appropri-
ate molecules possessing polarized protic moieties could be
[5] Nucleophilic attack of strong bases to TATA makes stable covalent
bonds: a) B. Baisch, D. Raffa, U. Jung, O. M. Magnussen, C. Nicolas,
J. Lacour, J. Kubitschke, R. Herges, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
442–443; b) U. Jung, S. Kuhn, U. Cornelissen, F. Tuczek, T. Strun-
skus, V. Zaporojtchenko, J. Kubitschke, R. Herges, O. Magnussen,
Langmuir 2011, 27, 5899–5908.
À
associated with the polarized oxygen in the C O linkage, re-
sulting in bond cleavage. Such behavior is characteristic in
macromolecules comprising ionic species due to their zwit-
terion-based covalent linkages.[11]
In summary, the first examples of zwitterion-based cova-
lent oligomers and polymers exhibiting dynamic behaviors
are reported, even though they did not always show the sim-
ilar features as was observed in ordinary dynamic covalent
polymers. Formation of the covalent polymers based on
zwitterions does not follow ordinary polymerization mecha-
nisms, such as anionic and/or cationic ones. Instead, the
zwitterion-based polymers were formed through pre-poly-
merization, as was observed in supramolecular polymers,[12]
because the monomer units have two reactive sites, cationic
and anionic, in the initial state. Further modification of
monomer units can control the stabilities of the oligomeric
and polymeric structures and provide various functional ma-
terials, such as reversible photoresists, by mixing with photo-
base and photoacid generators. These detailed investigations
are currently underway.
[6] a) H. H. Freedman, S. V. McKinley, J. W. Rakshys, Jr., A. E. Young,
[7] pKR+ values of trityl cations have been estimated as À6.63, +3.88,
and +6.94 for trityl, 4-(dimethylamino)-substituted trityl, and 4,4ꢂ-
bis(dimethylamino)-substituted trityl, respectively. See also Ref. [3].
[8] a) Gaussian 03, Revision C.01, M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B.
Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, J. A. Mont-
gomery, Jr., T. Vreven, K. N. Kudin, J. C. Burant, J. M. Millam, S. S.
Iyengar, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, M. Cossi, G. Scalmani,
N. Rega, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K.
Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda,
O. Kitao, H. Nakai, M. Klene, X. Li, J. E. Knox, H. P. Hratchian,
J. B. Cross, V. Bakken, C. Adamo, J. Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R. E.
Stratmann, O. Yazyev, A. J. Austin, R. Cammi, C. Pomelli, J. W.
Ochterski, P. Y. Ayala, K. Morokuma, G. A. Voth, P. Salvador, J. J.
Dannenberg, V. G. Zakrzewski, S. Dapprich, A. D. Daniels, M. C.
Strain, O. Farkas, D. K. Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari,
J. B. Foresman, J. V. Ortiz, Q. Cui, A. G. Baboul, S. Clifford, J. Cio-
slowski, B. B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaro-
mi, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, T. Keith, M. A. Al-Laham, C. Y. Peng,
A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, P. M. W. Gill, B. Johnson, W.
Chen, M. W. Wong, C. Gonzalez, J. A. Pople, Gaussian, Inc., Wall-
ingford CT, 2004; b) Gaussian 09, Revision B.01, M. J. Frisch, G. W.
Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman,
Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 6956 – 6960
ꢀ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
6959