Platinum(II) and GoldACTHNUTRGNEU(GN III) Allenylidene Complexes
COMMUNICATION
couple. The oxidation (irreversible anode peak)/reduction
(quasi-reversible) of 0.66/À1.61 V for 2a and 0.79/À1.71 V
for 2b are anodically shifted from those of 1a (0.49/
À1.73 V) and 1b (0.46/À1.84 V); this is consistent with an
increased p-back-bonding donation from Pt to the allenyli-
dene moiety. The electrochemical reduction of the AuIII
complexes 3a/b and 4a/b are irreversible, but a similar shift-
ing trend in cathode peak potentials has also been observed
from the Au–acetylide (À1.83 V for 3a and À1.96 V for 3b)
to Au–allenylidene (À1.62 V for 4a and À1.59 V for 4b)
complexes.
tions in solution. As for 4a and 4b, their absorption spectra
display characteristic features as that of other AuIII com-
plexes having the same cyclometalating ligands, which are
mainly attributed to intraACTHNUTRGENNGlU iCAHUTGTNRENgUNG and charge transfer (ILCT) tran-
sitions.[12] The frontier molecular orbitals (FMO) calculated
based on crystallographic geometries of 2a and 4a are
shown in Figure 1c and d, respectively. The electron density
in HOMO and LUMO of 2a are mainly localized on the Pt
d-orbital/phenyl of C^N^N and bipyridyl of C^N^N, respec-
tively, revealing a mixture of MLCT/ILCT transitions to ac-
count for the lowest-energy absorption of 2a. The electron
density in HOMO and LUMO of 4a are mainly localized
on the C^N^C and allenylidene ligand, respectively, reveal-
ing a LLCT transition to be responsible for the lowest-
energy absorption of 4a.
The electronic absorption and emission data of complexes
2a/b and 4a/b together with their acetylide precursors 1a/b,
and 3a/b are listed in the Supporting Information and the
representative spectra for 2a and 4b are shown in Figure 2.
Upon excitation beyond 400 nm, PtII complexes 2a and
2b in diluted and degassed CH2Cl2 solutions show strong
yellow-green emission with lmax (quantum yield, lifetime) of
542 nm (34%, 3.9 ms) and 530 nm (63%, 4.5 ms), respective-
ly. Based on the T1 optimized geometries, the TDDFT ap-
proach associated with the polarized continuum model
(PCM) in CH2Cl2 was used to calculate the emission proper-
ties. To better describe the charge-transfer character of the
electronic excitation of 2a and 2b, the density functional
wB97X-D,[13] which includes 100% long-range exact ex-
change, 22% of short-range exact exchange, the B97 corre-
lation density functional,[14] and empirical dispersion correc-
tions, was employed for the TDDFT calculations. The calcu-
lated triplet emissions of 2a and 2b in solutions are in the
520–525 nm region; this is in good agreement with the emis-
sion data from experiments. These emissions can be attribut-
3
ed to MLCT/ILCT excited states with reference to previous
works on cyclometalated PtII complexes.[15] Complex 2a ex-
hibits an emission maximum at 683 nm whereas the emission
of 2b is markedly red-shifted to the NIR region (lmax
=
785 nm). On the other hand, the AuIII complex 4b having
extended C^N^C ligand gives dual emission bands in dilut-
ed, degassed CH2Cl2 solution upon excitation at 385 nm; the
weak band at around 450 nm and the vibronically structured
band at 525 nm (with a quantum yield of 3.3% and a life-
time of 111 ms) are ascribed to excited states having singlet
and triplet ILCT origin, respectively.[12] Although 4a is
weakly emissive in solutions, it shows an intense bright-
yellow emission at lmax of 540 nm (with a lifetime of 5.8 ms)
upon excitation at 350 nm in solid state at 298 K. The blue-
shift emission of 4a with respect to 2a is due to the higher
p* (LUMO) energy of allenylidene than that of bipyridyl
moiety of C^N^N.
The combination of a planar cationic structure and intri-
guing phosphorescent properties renders these metal alleny-
lidene complexes to potentially act as efficient switched-on
probes for DNA molecules in aqueous solutions. Thus, an
emission titration was performed with solutions of 2a and
2b (2 mm) in Tris-buffered saline/DMSO (3 mL, 99:1 v/v) by
aliquots of a calf thymus DNA (ctDNA) stock solution
(37 mm). As depicted in Figure 3a, upon increasing the
ctDNA concentration from 0 to 3.6ꢂ10À4 m in intervals of
Figure 2. Absorption and normalized emission spectra of: a) 2a, and
b) 4b in different matrixes.
To differentiate the absorption of allenylidene moiety from
those of the cyclometalated ligand, a model complex, the
heteroleptically coordinated allenylidene AuI complex (6)
was prepared from its acetylide precursor (5; Scheme 1). A
CH2Cl2 solution of 6 shows a distinct lowest-energy absorp-
tion band at 278 nm (see the Supporting Information for a
spectrum) and a structureless emission at lmax =416 nm, re-
vealing that ligand-centered transitions of the allenylidene
moiety itself do not occur at spectral region beyond 300 nm.
Solutions of complexes 2a and 2b in CH2Cl2 are yellow with
a modest low-energy absorption band at lmax =400 nm.
When the concentration of 2a in CH2Cl2 is increased
beyond 2ꢂ10À5 m, an additional distinct absorption band
emerges at lmax =440 nm; this band is tentatively ascribed to
a MMLCT transition derived from molecular aggregates
through Pt···Pt interactions. The absence of MMLCT absorp-
tion band in the case of 2b is attributed to the two bulky
tert-butyl groups disfavoring intermolecular stacking interac-
Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 9457 – 9462
ꢀ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
9459