110
M.L. Sundararajan et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 125 (2014) 104–113
(A1E–Cd), and 3433 cmꢂ1(A1E–Fe), may be due to
m(OH) of
shifted to downfield in the complexes indicates the formation of
metal nitrogen bond. The signal at d13.742 ppm in ligand is disap-
peared in metal complexes A1E–Zn and A1E–Cd confirms that the
phenolic proton (AOH) is involved in coordination with Zn (II) and
Cd (II). Thus the 1H NMR spectral observations supported the
bidentate nature of ligand in coordination with metal salts.
13C NMR spectra of the Schiff base (A1E) and its two complexes
A1E–Zn, A1E–Cd were recorded in CDCl3 solution, using tetrameth-
ylsilane (TMS) as internal standard. 13C NMR spectrum of ligand
displayed characteristic signals at d14.93 ppm, d64.62 ppm,
d101.47 ppm, d101.65–151.45 ppm and d160.59 ppm are due to
the ACH3, ACH2, AOACH2AOA, aromatic carbons and azomethine
(AHC@NA) carbon respectively [34]. The 13C NMR spectra of com-
plexes A1E–Zn and A1E–Cd shows no appreciable changes com-
pared with ligand. The spectral data are presented in Table 4. The
1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of ligand (A1E) and 1H NMR spectra
of A1E–Zn and A1E–Cd are given in Figs. 2 and 3.
water molecule. The band at 1629 cmꢂ1 due to azomeꢂth1ine group
of Schiff base shifted to 1–28 cmꢂ1 [1601 cm (A1E–Cu),
1603 cmꢂ1(A1E–Ni), 1635 cmꢂ1(A1E–Zn), 1630 cmꢂ1(A1E–Cd),
1614 cmꢂ1 (A1E–Fe)] on complexation suggesting the coordination
of azomethine nitrogen with the metal atoms. This shifting can be
explained by the donation of electron from lone pair of azomethine
nitrogen to the empty d-orbital of the transition metal atom. How-
ever, shifting of band for azomethine and phenolic group to both
higher and lower frequencies have been well documented in liter-
ature [30]. Moreover A1E–Cd and A1E–Ni complexes showed the
coordination of acetato group by the appearance of new bands
due to masym(COO), and m
sym(COO) at 1563–1588 cmꢂ1and 1338–
1342 cmꢂ1respectively [31] and A1E–Zn complex shows three
new bands at 1460 cmꢂ1, 1385 cmꢂ1 and 1087 cmꢂ1 due to the
coordination of nitrato group in the coordination complex [32].
Furtherꢂm1ore, new band appeared at the lower frequency region;
614 cmꢂ1(A1E–Zn), 625 cmꢂ1 (A1E–Cd), 619 cmꢂ1(A1E–Ni),
510 cm (A1E–Cu), 575 cmꢂ1 (A1E–Fe) and 508 cmꢂ1 (A1E–Zn),
549 cmꢂ1 (A1E–Cd), 503 cmꢂ1 (A1E–Ni), 475 cmꢂ1 (A1E–Cu),
482 cmꢂ1 (A1E–Fe) is due to the metal nitrogen (M–N) and metal
oxygen (M–O) coordination respectively. Therefore from the above
details it is concluded that the ligand acts as a bidentate and coor-
dinate to the empty d-orbital of metal ion through the azomethine
nitrogen and phenolic oxygen atom. The IR spectral details are pre-
sented in Table 3.
Mass spectra
The mass spectra of the ligand and its transition metal com-
plexes are recorded at ambient temperature. Mass spectra are a
useful technique to interpret the stoichiometric composition of
ligand and its complexes. The Schiff base ligand (A1E) shows a
molecular ion peak at m/z 285.68, which is very close to the calcu-
lated values of m/z 285.29. The peak assignment in mass spectra
observed for ligand and the metal complexes are presented in
Table 5. The mass spectral evidence reveals that the metal com-
plexes have equimolar ratio of metal and ligand, as prescribed in
Scheme 1. A representative mass spectrum is given in Fig. 4.
1H and 13C NMR spectra
NMR spectroscopy is a useful tool to establish the structure and
nature of many Schiff bases and their metal complexes. The 1H
NMR spectra of Schiff base (A1E) and its diamagnetic complexes
A1E–Zn and A1E–Cd were recorded in CDCl3, using tetramethylsil-
ane (TMS) as internal standard and are presented in Table 4. 1H
NMR spectrum of ligand (A1E) showed signal at d1.504 ppm corre-
sponding to CH3 proton. A sharp signal observed at d4.135 ppm is
due to CH2 proton and a sharp singlet appeared at d6.011 ppm is
attributed to methylene dioxy moiety (AOACH2AOA). The multi-
ple signals observed between d6.794 and d7.00 ppm are related
to the aromatic protons. The peak at d8.575 ppm is assigned to azo-
methine (AHC@NA) with an integration corresponding to 1 proton
in the ligand. The sharp singlet observed at d13.742 ppm is due to
phenolic proton of the ligand [33]. 1H NMR spectra of the
complexes (A1E–Zn and A1E–Cd) was also recorded in CDCl3. In
the 1H NMR spectra of the Zinc (II) and Cadmium (II) complexes,
the signal for imine proton in the free ligand at d8.575 ppm is
Thermal analysis
Thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential thermal
analysis (DTA) are useful technique to determine the thermal sta-
bility of the metal complexes. In the present study, heating rates
were suitably controlled at 20 °C/min, under nitrogen atmosphere
and the loss in weight was measured up to 1000 °C. The stages of
decomposition temperature range, decomposition product and
weight loss percentage of complexes are given in Table 6. The first
step at 30–125 °C with a weight loss (found) of 4.00% for A1E–Zn,
3.70% for A1E–Cd, 11.50% for A1E–Ni, 4.40% for A1E–Cu and 13.80%
for A1E–Fe is attributed to lattice water molecule. The second step
weight loss at 125–280 °C corresponds to removal of coordinated
water molecule from the metal complexes of A1E–Zn, A1E–Cd,
A1E–Ni, A1E–Cu, and A1E–Fe. Moreover, the third step observed
Table 6
Thermal analysis of metal complexes.
Complexes
TG range in °C
Mass loss in % Found(calc)
Assignment
[A1E–Zn(NO3)(H2O)] H2O
30–210
210–250
275–1000
4.00(4.02)
4.00(4.02)
63.70(63.72)
Loss of 1 lattice H2O molecule
Loss of 1 coordinated H2O molecule
Decomposition of the ligand
[A1E–Cd(COOCH3)(H2O)]H2O
[A1E–Ni(COOCH3)(H2O)]3H2O
[A1E–Cu(Cl) (H2O)] H2O
50–225
225–275
300–1000
3.70 (3.66)
3.70(3.66)
58.00 (58.02)
Loss of 1 lattice H2O molecule
Loss of 1 coordinated H2O molecule
Decomposition of the ligand
30–225
225–280
310–1000
11.50(11.39)
3.80 (3.79)
60.20 (60.17)
Loss of 3 lattice H2O molecule
Loss of 1 coordinated H2O molecule
Decomposition of the ligand
50–125
125–225
325–1000
4.40(4.29)
4.40(4.29)
68(68.03)
Loss of 1 lattice H2O molecule
Loss of 1 coordinated H2O molecule
Decomposition of the ligand
[A1E–Fe(Cl2)2H2O]4H2O
50–125
125–225
250–1000
13.80(13.86)
7.00(6.93)
55.00(54.95)
Loss of 4 lattice H2O molecule
Loss of 2 coordinated H2O molecule
Decomposition of the ligand