Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Communication
a rapid access to novel, fused N-heterocyclic acetic acid deriva-
tives. The reaction proceeds via a Cu-catalyzed domino reac-
tion involving (i) an Ullmann type intermolecular C–C
followed by (ii) an intramolecular C–N coupling and then (iii)
an intramolecular aza-Michael type addition (and subsequent
aerial oxidation). Several of these compounds showed promis-
ing PDE4B inhibition in vitro and seem to have potential for
related medical applications. Overall, the one-pot methodo-
logy, presented here, may find wide use in constructing a
diversity based library of small molecules for chemical and
medicinal applications.
Fig. 3 (A) NOE study of 4g and (B) complexation of 3 with Cu-catalyst.
RA thank the CSIR, for research fellowships. The authors
thank Prof. J. Iqbal and the CSIR [grant 02(0127)/13/EMR-II]
for support.
Scheme 2 Role of CuI in the generation of compound 4.
Notes and references
1 For selected in-depth reviews, see: (a) L. F. Tietze, Chem.
Rev., 1996, 96, 115; (b) H. Pellissier, Tetrahedron, 2006, 62,
2143; (c) K. C. Nicolaou, D. J. Edmonds and P. G. Bulger,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 7134; (d) D. M. D’Souza and
T. J. J. Muller, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2007, 36, 1095;
(e) S. F. Kirsch, Synthesis, 2008, 3183; (f) D. J. Gorin,
B. D. Sherry and F. D. Toste, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 3351;
(g) N. T. Patil and Y. Yamamoto, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 3395;
(h) E. Jiménez-Núñez and A. M. Echavarren, Chem. Rev.,
2008, 108, 3326; (i) V. Michelet, P. Y. Toullec and J.-P. Genêt,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 4268.
Fig. 4 Dose dependent inhibition of PDE4B by compound 3e.
2 A. Kar, Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)
in Medicinal Chemistry, New Age International (P) Ltd.,
New Delhi, India, 2005, ISBN: 81-224-1565-2.
NOE study of 4g (Fig. 3A). Mechanistically, the Z-isomer of 4
seemed to have been formed in situ via the generation of 3
(Scheme 1) and then a Cu-complex E-4 (Fig. 3B) which on
aerial oxidation afforded the olefin 4. To gain further evidence,
3s was treated with K2CO3 and CuI + K2CO3, separately,
whereby a mixture of products was obtained in the first case
and the desired 4e (62% yield) in the second case (Scheme 2).
Several of the synthesized compounds showed promising
inhibition of PDE4B [e.g. 3b (71%), 3e (93%), 3f (86%), 3i
(66%), 3j (66%), 3k (78%), 3o (62%), 3p (62%), 3t (83%), 3u
(93%), 3w (71%) and 3x (88%)] when tested in vitro9 at 30 µM
(see the ESI†). This result was further supported by the results
of the docking of 3e (Fig. 2) and 3u (see the ESI†) into the
PDE4B protein (Glide score −23.05 and −22.05 vs. rolipram’s
−24.61). The ester carbonyl group participated in H-bonding
with the Gln443 of the Q pocket in the case of 3e and the
His234 of the metal binding pocket in case of 3u, respectively.
Additionally, both 3e and 3u showed a common Ar–Ar inter-
action with the Phe446 of PDE4B (see the ESI†). The com-
pound 3e showed a dose dependent inhibition of PDE4B with
an IC50 (the half maximal inhibitory concentration) ∼ 1.06 µM
comparable to rolipram’s IC50 ∼ 1.0 µM (Fig. 4).
3 For our earlier effort, see: (a) K. S. Kumar, P. M. Kumar,
K. A. Kumar, M. Sreenivasulu, A. A. Jafar, D. Rambabu,
G. R. Krishna, C. M. Reddy, R. Kapavarapu, K. S. Kumar,
K. K. Priya, K. V. L. Parsa and M. Pal, Chem. Commun., 2011,
47, 5010; (b) G. R. Reddy, T. R. Reddy, S. C. Joseph,
K. S. Reddy, L. S. Reddy, P. M. Kumar, G. R. Krishna,
C. M. Reddy, D. Rambabu, R. Kapavarapu, C. Lakshmi,
T. Meda, K. K. Priya, K. V. L. Parsa and M. Pal, Chem.
Commun., 2011, 47, 7779; (c) P. M. Kumar, K. S. Kumar,
P. K. Mohakhud, K. Mukkanti, R. Kapavarapu, K. V. L. Parsa
and M. Pal, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 431; (d) R. Sunke,
R. Adepu, R. Kapavarapu, S. Chintala, C. L. T. Meda,
K. V. L. Parsa and M. Pal, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 3570;
(e) B. Prasad, B. Y. Sreenivas, G. R. Krishna, R. Kapavarapu
and M. Pal, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 6716; (f) R. Adepu,
R. Sunke, C. L. T. Meda, D. Rambabu, G. R. Krishna,
C. M. Reddy, G. S. Deora, K. V. L. Parsa and M. Pal, Chem.
Commun., 2013, 49, 190.
4 For reviews, see: (a) A. Kodimuthali, S. L. Jabaris and M. Pal,
J. Med. Chem., 2008, 51, 5471; (b) M. D. Houslay, P. Schafer
and K. Y. J. Zhang, Drug Discovery Today, 2005, 10, 1503.
5 For the synthesis: (a) From the reaction of carboxaldehyde
with the diphosphonate followed by hydrolysis or via
Friedel–Crafts acetylation followed by a Willgerodt type
In conclusion, a robust, mild and ligand/additive-free
Cu-mediated domino reaction has been developed, that allows
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2014, 12, 2514–2518 | 2517