´
´
´
B. Macıas, I. Garcıa, M. V. Villa, J. Borras, A. Castin˜eiras, F. Sanz
2
ameters for non-H atoms was carried out by minimizing ω(Fo -
Preparation of the compounds
Fc ) . Refinement on F2 for all reflections, weighted R factors and
2 2
all goodness of fit S are based on F2, while conventional R factors
are based on F; R factors based on F2 are statistically about twice
as large as those based on F, and R factors based on all data will
be even larger. All calculations were performed using CRYSOM
[30] software for data collection, XRAY8O [31] for data reduction,
SHELXTL [32] to resolve and refine the structure and to prepare
material for publication.
The sulfonamide ligands were prepared by direct synthesis between
8-aminoquinoline with the corresponding sulfonyl chloride, follow-
ing the method described elsewhere [19Ϫ21].
The complexes were prepared by direct reaction between the sul-
fonamide ligands and ZnII salts. Although the copper complexes
were prepared in a neutral medium [20, 21], addition of a base for
deprotonating the amine nitrogen atom was necessary to prepare
the zinc complexes. The process can be summarized as follows:
1.5 mmol of the sulfonamide are dissolved in 75 ml methanol and
2 ml 2M NH3 are added. While this solution is magnetically stirred,
0.75 mmol ZnCl2 dissolved in 50 ml methanol are dropwise added.
When addition is completed a yellow precipitate is formed which
is separated by filtration. Yield is 80Ϫ85 %.
For the complex [Zn(qnsa)2], a yellow prismatic crystal was
mounted on a glass fiber and used for data collection. Crystal data
were collected using a Bruker SMART CCD 1000 diffractometer.
Graphite monochromated MoKα radiation was used throughout.
The data were processed with SAINT [33] and corrected for ab-
sorption using SADABS (transmissions factors: 1.000-0.694) [34].
The structure was solved using the program SHELXS-97 [25] and
refined by full-matrix least-squares techniques against F2 using
SHELXS-97 [26]. Positional and anisotropic atomic displacement
parameters were refined using a riding model. Isotropic atomic dis-
placement parameters for hydrogen atoms were constrained to be
1.2 times those of the respective C atoms. Criteria of a satisfactory
complete analysis were the ratios of rms shift to standard deviation
less than 0.01 and no significant features in final difference maps.
Atomic scattering factors from “International Tables for Crystal-
lography” [27]. Molecular graphics from PLATON [28] and
SCHAKAL [29].
Analytical data: [Zn(qbsa)2]: Found: C, 56.70; H, 3.32; N, 9.05; Zn,
10.69. Calculated for ZnC30H22N4O4S2: C, 57.02; H, 3.51; N, 8.87;
Zn, 10.34 %.
[Zn(qtsa)2]: Found: C, 58.11; H, 3.91; N, 8.33; Zn, 9.75. Calculated
for ZnC32H26N4O4S2: C, 58.23; H, 3.94; N, 8.49; Zn, 9.91 %.
[Zn(qnsa)2]: Found: C, 61.81; H, 3.54; N, 7.91; Zn, 9.14. Calculated
for ZnC38H26N4O4S2: C, 62.34; H, 3.55; N, 7.66; Zn, 8.94 %.
To prepare the solids in crystalline form, the precipitates are dis-
solved in DMF (dimethylformamide) and, upon standing at room
temperature yellow crystals, suitable for single crystal X-ray diffrac-
tion studies, are formed. As shown below, compound [Zn(qbsa)2]
crystallizes with a molecule of solvent (DMF), while complex
[Zn(qtsa)2] with half a molecule of water.
A summary of the crystal data, experimental details and refinement
results are listed in Table 1 for the three complexes. Table 2 shows
some selected structural information. Complete lists with atomic
coordinates, anisotropic displacement parameters, bond lengths
and angles have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic
Data Center, 912 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK (fax:
ϩ44-1223-336033; e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk or www: http://
www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk) [CCDC: 193501, 194345 and 194346].
Crystal Structures Determination
A light yellow plate crystal of [Zn(qbsa)2]·DMF was mounted on
a glass fiber and used for data collection. Cell constants and an
orientation matrix for data collection were obtained by least-
squares refinement of the diffraction data from 25 reflections in the
range of 14.09 <θ < 23.92° on an Enraf Nonius CAD4 automatic
diffractometer [22]. Data were collected using CuKα radiation and
the ω-scan technique, and corrected for Lorentz and polarization
effects [23]. A semi-empirical absorption correction ψscan was
made [24]. The structure was solved by direct methods [25] and
subsequent difference Fourier maps, and refined on F2 by a full-
matrix least-squares procedure using anisotropic displacement par-
ameters [26]. All hydrogen atoms were located in their calculated
Results and Discussion
Crystal Structure of the complexes
Molecular structures for the three zinc complexes are shown
in Figures 1, 2 and 3, which show that, as expected, the
local environment around the Zn2ϩ cations is similar in all
three cases, bearing in mind the similarities among the three
ligands. The structures correspond to highly distorted tetra-
hedron, where the sulfonamide acts as a bidentate ligand.
Zn-ligand bonding takes place through the nitrogen atoms
of the sulfonamide and quinoline groups. Bond distances,
also similar in all three compounds, are slightly larger to
the quinoline nitrogen than to the sulfonamide nitrogen
atoms, as previously reported for the corresponding Ni and
Cu compounds [19Ϫ21], and all them are in the range re-
ported in the literature [15, 16, 18] for complexes of Zn with
other sulfonamides. The distances between the zinc cation
and the oxygen atoms of the sulfonyl groups are larger than
˚
positions (C-H 0.93-0.97 A) and were refined using a riding model.
Atomic scattering factors from “International Tables for X-ray
Crystallography” [27]. Molecular graphics from PLATON [28] and
SCHAKAL [29].
For the yellow complex [Zn(qtsa)2] data were collected on a four
circle Seifert XRD 3003 SC diffractometer using CuKα radiation,
graphite monochromator and the ω-2θ scan technique. The unit
cell parameters were determined by least squares refinement on the
2θ values of 25 strong well centered reflections in the range 16
< 2θ < 40°. Scattering factors for neutral atoms and anomalous
dispersion correction for Zn, C, N, O and S were taken from “Inter-
national Tables for X-ray Crystallography” [27]. The structure was
resolved by direct methods and refined in the monoclinic space
group C2/c. Structure determination of the title compound af-
forded one water molecule at a fully occupied special position (4e)
with point symmetry 2, but its hydrogen atoms were not found.
Full matrix least-squares refinement with anisotropic thermal par-
˚
3.0 A, thus indicating the lack of chemical bonding between
these two atoms, so providing space for coordination of the
amine nitrogen atom. The sulfonamide molecule forms a
stable five-membered ring with the metal cation.
The bond angles N(11)-Zn-(N12) and N(21)-Zn-N(22),
are in the 80Ϫ85° range and depend on the precise param-
256
Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2003, 629, 255Ϫ260